Grabowski v. State
| Decision Date | 24 August 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. A98A1230.,A98A1230. |
| Citation | Grabowski v. State, 507 S.E.2d 472, 234 Ga.App. 222 (Ga. App. 1998) |
| Parties | GRABOWSKI v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Gregory A. Hicks, James K. Luttrell, Woodstock, for appellant.
Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Rachelle L. Strausner, Scott T. Poole, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.
Roderick John Grabowski was found guilty by a jury of burglary, driving without a valid driver's license, and giving a false name to a law enforcement officer.On appeal from the judgment of conviction entered on the guilty verdicts, Grabowski claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the burglary conviction, and the trial court erred by refusing to suppress certain evidence.Finding sufficient evidence to support the convictions on all three offenses and finding no error in the trial court's refusal to suppress evidence, we affirm.
1.Grabowski contends the evidence was insufficient to show that he was guilty of burglary.The State presented testimony from the victim of the burglary and various police officers in support of its case.
The victim testified that about 9:00 a.m., while she was alone inside her house, she heard loud pounding on the front door and saw a white male wearing a plaid shirt, jeans, and an "Indiana Jones" style hat walk past a window.She could not see the man's face because the hat was pulled down low.The victim called 911 and reported the incident and also gave a description of the man to a police officer who was dispatched to her house a few minutes after the 911 call.
About 10:30 a.m. of the same morning, the victim noticed that a white van had pulled into the driveway of her house.As she was looking at the van from a window, she heard a loud bashing noise in the basement of the house.She again called 911 and reported that someone had apparently forced open the basement door, and she could hear the footsteps of someone coming up the basement steps toward the inside door to the house.At that point, the victim put down the phone and threw a heavy doorstop down the hall of the house and yelled, "Get out of my house."She heard the footsteps of someone running back down the basement steps.She ran to the front window of the house in time to see the white van leaving the driveway at a high rate of speed.As the van pulled away, she saw clothing stacked up against the rear window of the van and a Tennessee license plate on the van.The victim picked up the phone and reported to the 911 operator, who was still on the line, that the person had left the basement and was driving away in a white van with a Tennessee license plate.She also watched the van as it drove away and told the 911 operator that she saw the van heading toward Arnold Mill Road.
The State presented evidence that the 911 operator immediately conveyed this information to the police by radio.Police dispatched an officer to the victim's residence and placed officers in the vicinity of the victim's house on alert for a white van with a Tennessee license plate in the area of Arnold Mill Road.Shortly after receiving the radio alert, two officers responding to the alert spotted a white van with a Tennessee license plate on Arnold Mill Road and stopped the van to investigate the burglary report.The officers explained to Grabowski that they had stopped him to investigate a recent burglary in the area where a similar white van had been spotted.Grabowski, who was the driver and sole occupant of the van, had no driver's license or other identification and gave a false name to the officers.
After being contacted by the officers at the investigatory stop, the officer dispatched to the victim's house drove the victim past the van, and the victim identified Grabowski's van as the white van she had seen leaving her driveway after the break-in.The victim noticed not only that Grabowski's van was the same type of white van with a Tennessee license plate, but that the rear window of the van was obstructed with clothing in the same way as the van she had seen in her driveway.After the victim identified Grabowski's van, an officer at the investigatory stop placed Grabowski under arrest for failure to have a driver's license.
At the victim's house, officers found that the basement door had been smashed open from the outside.A footprint was found on the outside of the basement door, footprints were found on the floor inside the basement, and tire tracks were found in the victim's driveway.After Grabowski was arrested, officers seized the shoes he was wearing and determined by comparison that the pattern of the tread on Grabowski's shoes matched the pattern of the tread of the footprint on the basement door and matched the tread pattern of the footprints inside the basement.Officers also matched the tire tread pattern on Grabowski's van to the tire tracks left by the van that the victim saw leaving her driveway after the break-in.Although the victim did not see the person who broke into the basement of her house at 10:30 a.m., Grabowski fit the general description and was wearing the same type of clothing as the person seen by the victim outside her house at 9:00 a.m. the same morning.The victim identified a hat found in Grabowski's van as similar to the "Indiana Jones" style hat worn by the unidentified person she saw outside her house at 9:00 a.m. on the morning of the break-in.In...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Willis v. the State.
...to stop Willis after the victim literally pointed out Willis to an officer as the person who robbed him. Grabowski v. State, 234 Ga.App. 222, 225(4), 507 S.E.2d 472 (1998). Accordingly, this argument lacks merit. 4. Willis contends that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to a......
-
Dee v. State
...to suspects in Neil v. Biggers and Simmons v. United States" to testimony identifying inanimate objects. Grabowski v. State, 234 Ga.App. 222, 224(3), 507 S.E.2d 472 (1998). The distinguishing factor is that the same due process concerns are not implicated in the identification of physical e......
- Bahadori v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
-
Fuentes v. State
...motel when the sheriff's deputy arrived. Thus, the evidence authorized Fuentes' conviction for burglary. See Grabowski v. State, 234 Ga.App. 222, 224(1), 507 S.E.2d 472 (1998); Etheridge v. State, 228 Ga.App. 788, 789(1), 492 S.E.2d 755 Judgment affirmed. McMURRAY, P.J., and ANDREWS, P.J., ......