Grady v. Schmitz

Decision Date26 October 1988
Citation551 A.2d 755,209 Conn. 822
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesJohn H. GRADY et al. v. Robert A. SCHMITZ et al.

Heather M. Brown and Ridgely W. Brown, Darien, in support of the petition.

Philip R. McKnight, Greenwich, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn.App. 292, 547 A.2d 563, is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Assocs., LLC
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 20 Junio 2017
    ...A.2d 902, cert. denied, 271 Conn. 908, 859 A.2d 560 (2004) ; Grady v. Schmitz , 16 Conn.App. 292, 547 A.2d 563, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 822, 551 A.2d 755 (1988) ; Marion Road Assn . v. Harlow , 1 Conn.App. 329, 472 A.2d 785 (1984) ; Thompson v. Fairfield Country Day School Corp. , Superior ......
  • Abel v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 20 Agosto 2021
    ...v. Payne, supra, 18 Conn. App. at 53, 557 A.2d 122 ; Grady v. Schmitz, 16 Conn. App. 292, 296, 547 A.2d 563, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 822, 551 A.2d 755 (1988) ; Marion Road Assn. v. Harlow, 1 Conn. App. 329, 333, 472 A.2d 785 (1984). We begin with the language of the instruments at issue. Th......
  • Bueno v. Firgeleski
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 27 Marzo 2018
    ...in title ...." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Grady v. Schmitz , 16 Conn. App. 292, 296, 547 A.2d 563, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 822, 551 A.2d 755 (1988). The court noted that "[w]here the owner of two adjacent parcels conveys one with a restrictive covenant and retains the other, whethe......
  • Jepsen v. Camassar
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 25 Febrero 2020
    ...an injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant. See Grady v. Schmitz , 16 Conn. App. 292, 294, 547 A.2d 563, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 822, 551 A.2d 755 (1988). The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendants; id., at 293, 547 A.2d 563 ; which this court found erroneous on appea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT