Graham v. Commissioner of Transportation

Docket NumberSC19867
Decision Date20 November 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • State v. Ashby
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • August 6, 2020
    ...generally insufficient to overcome the weighty considerations attendant to stare decisis.42 See, e.g., Graham v. Commissioner of Transportation , 330 Conn. 400, 420, 195 A.3d 664 (2018).In light of the foregoing, we decline the defendant's invitation to overrule Allen and its progeny. The d......
  • Clements v. Aramark Corp.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2021
    ...own authority to reconsider the merits of our earlier decision." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Graham v. Commissioner of Transportation , 330 Conn. 400, 417–18, 195 A.3d 664 (2018).21 We also agree with the following explication of the issue: "The right to compensation benefits depend......
  • State v. Petion
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 23, 2019
    ...it saves resources and it promotes judicial efficiency." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Graham v. Commissioner of Transportation , 330 Conn. 400, 417, 195 A.3d 664 (2018). "While stare decisis is not an inexorable command ... the doctrine carries such persuasive force that we have alwa......
  • Carpenter v. Daar
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • February 1, 2023
    ...own authority to reconsider the merits of our earlier decision." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Graham v. Commissioner of Transportation , 330 Conn. 400, 417–18, 195 A.3d 664 (2018) ; accord Spiotti v. Wolcott , 326 Conn. 190, 201–202, 163 A.3d 46 (2017).aConsiderations of Legislative ......
  • Get Started for Free