Graham v. Florida, 08-7412.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation176 L. Ed. 2d 825,130 S.Ct. 2011
Docket NumberNo. 08-7412.,08-7412.
PartiesTerrance Jamar GRAHAM, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.
Decision Date09 November 2009

130 S.Ct. 2011
560 US __
176 L. Ed.
2d 825

Terrance Jamar GRAHAM, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA.

No. 08-7412.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 9, 2009.
Decided May 17, 2010.


130 S.Ct. 2012

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 2013

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 2014

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 2015

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 2016

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.

130 S.Ct. 2017

Bryan S. Gowdy, appointed by this Court, Jacksonville, FL, for petitioner.

Scott D. Makar, Solicitor General, Tallahassee, FL, for respondent.

Drew S. Days, III, Brian R. Matsui, Seth M. Galanter, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, George C. Harris, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Bryan S. Gowdy, Counsel of Record, John S. Mills, Rebecca Bowen Creed, Jessie L. Harrell, Mills Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General of Florida, Scott D. Makar, Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Louis F. Hubener, Chief Deputy Solicitor General, Timothy D. Osterhaus, Craig D. Feiser, Courtney Brewer, Ronald A. Lathan, Deputy Solicitors General, Tallahassee, FL, for respondent.

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The issue before the Court is whether the Constitution permits a juvenile offender to be sentenced to life in prison without

130 S.Ct. 2018

parole for a nonhomicide crime. The sentence was imposed by the State of Florida. Petitioner challenges the sentence under the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, made applicable to the States by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758 (1962).

I

Petitioner is Terrance Jamar Graham. He was born on January 6, 1987. Graham's parents were addicted to crack cocaine, and their drug use persisted in his early years. Graham was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in elementary school. He began drinking alcohol and using tobacco at age 9 and smoked marijuana at age 13.

In July 2003, when Graham was age 16, he and three other school-age youths attempted to rob a barbeque restaurant in Jacksonville, Florida. One youth, who worked at the restaurant, left the back door unlocked just before closing time. Graham and another youth, wearing masks, entered through the unlocked door. Graham's masked accomplice twice struck the restaurant manager in the back of the head with a metal bar. When the manager started yelling at the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
385 cases
  • State v. Draper
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • 13 Septiembre 2011
    ...violates the Constitution. Roper, supra, at 572 [125 S.Ct. at 1196–97, 161 L.Ed.2d 1, 23–24].... Graham v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 2022, 176 L.Ed.2d 825, 837 (2010).2. The Eighth Amendment Prohibition of Cruel and Unusual Punishment Draper argues that, by the same reas......
  • United States v. Reingold
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 26 Septiembre 2013
    ...unusual punishments, the Supreme Court has not limited itself to "historical conceptions" of impermissible sanctions, Graham v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 2021 (2010), but has looked to "'the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society,'" Kennedy v. Louisiana, ......
  • People v. Ramirez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 22 Junio 2011
    ...of Appellant's Sentence [17] Relying on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Graham v. Florida (2010) 560 U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825( Graham ), which held that a juvenile offender may not be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, appellant contends his......
  • United States v. Broxmeyer
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 28 Agosto 2012
    ...subject to judicial veto only when the legislative judgment oversteps constitutional bounds.”); cf. Graham v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 2037, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (Roberts, C.J., concurring) (recognizing, in state context, “primacy of the legislature in setting sentences”). ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
1 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT