Graham v. Florida, 08-7412.
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Citation | 176 L. Ed. 2d 825,130 S.Ct. 2011 |
Docket Number | No. 08-7412.,08-7412. |
Parties | Terrance Jamar GRAHAM, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA. |
Decision Date | 09 November 2009 |
130 S.Ct. 2011
560 US __
176 L. Ed. 2d 825
Terrance Jamar GRAHAM, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA.
No. 08-7412.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 9, 2009.
Decided May 17, 2010.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
Bryan S. Gowdy, appointed by this Court, Jacksonville, FL, for petitioner.
Scott D. Makar, Solicitor General, Tallahassee, FL, for respondent.
Drew S. Days, III, Brian R. Matsui, Seth M. Galanter, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, George C. Harris, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Bryan S. Gowdy, Counsel of Record, John S. Mills, Rebecca Bowen Creed, Jessie L. Harrell, Mills Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General of Florida, Scott D. Makar, Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Louis F. Hubener, Chief Deputy Solicitor General, Timothy D. Osterhaus, Craig D. Feiser, Courtney Brewer, Ronald A. Lathan, Deputy Solicitors General, Tallahassee, FL, for respondent.
Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court.
The issue before the Court is whether the Constitution permits a juvenile offender to be sentenced to life in prison without
parole for a nonhomicide crime. The sentence was imposed by the State of Florida. Petitioner challenges the sentence under the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, made applicable to the States by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758 (1962).
I
Petitioner is Terrance Jamar Graham. He was born on January 6, 1987. Graham's parents were addicted to crack cocaine, and their drug use persisted in his early years. Graham was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in elementary school. He began drinking alcohol and using tobacco at age 9 and smoked marijuana at age 13.
In July 2003, when Graham was age 16, he and three other school-age youths attempted to rob a barbeque restaurant in Jacksonville, Florida. One youth, who worked at the restaurant, left the back door unlocked just before closing time. Graham and another youth, wearing masks, entered through the unlocked door. Graham's masked accomplice twice struck the restaurant manager in the back of the head with a metal bar. When the manager started yelling at the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Draper
...violates the Constitution. Roper, supra, at 572 [125 S.Ct. at 1196–97, 161 L.Ed.2d 1, 23–24].... Graham v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 2022, 176 L.Ed.2d 825, 837 (2010).2. The Eighth Amendment Prohibition of Cruel and Unusual Punishment Draper argues that, by the same reas......
-
United States v. Reingold
...unusual punishments, the Supreme Court has not limited itself to "historical conceptions" of impermissible sanctions, Graham v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 2021 (2010), but has looked to "'the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society,'" Kennedy v. Louisiana, ......
-
People v. Ramirez
...of Appellant's Sentence [17] Relying on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Graham v. Florida (2010) 560 U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825( Graham ), which held that a juvenile offender may not be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, appellant contends his......
-
United States v. Broxmeyer
...subject to judicial veto only when the legislative judgment oversteps constitutional bounds.”); cf. Graham v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 2037, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (Roberts, C.J., concurring) (recognizing, in state context, “primacy of the legislature in setting sentences”). ......
-
Proportionality and parole.
...of parole when, just thirty-four days shy of his eighteenth birthday, he committed an armed home burglary. Graham v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 2018 (2010). A Florida trial judge sentenced him to life without parole for the original crimes, and an intermediate state appellate court affirmed,......
-
The growing pains of Graham v. Florida: deciphering whether lengthy term-of-years sentences for juvenile defendants can equate to the unconstitutional sentence of life without the possibility of parole.
...To Stabbing Transient, supra note 4. (11.) Teen Gets 40 Years In Transient Stabbing, supra note 1. (12.) Id. (13.) Graham v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2011 (2010) (determining that the Eighth Amendment does not permit a juvenile nonhomicide offender to be sentenced to life in prison without (14.)......
-
Adolescent brain science after Graham v. Florida.
...130 S. Ct. at 2026 (citing Brief for the American Psychological Ass'n et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners at 22-27, Graham, 130 S. Ct. 2011 (No. 08-7412), and Sullivan v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2059 (2010) (No. 08-7621), 2009 WL 2236778, at *22-27 [hereinafter Brief for the APA]; Bri......
-
What states should do to provide a meaningful opportunity for review and release: recognize human worth and potential.
...of Juvenile Life Without Parole Defense Resource Center, Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law, Barry University. (3.) Graham v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 2011 (4.) See id. at 2021 (using a categorical analysis involving a term of years, despite the categorical analysis in effect at the time Graham was ......
-
Chapter 12, AB 134 – Prohibits the imposition of a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole upon a juvenile offender convicted of a non-homicide crime
...of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole upon a juvenile offender convicted of a non-homicide crime. (Graham v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 2011 (2010)) This bill revises existing law to reflect this holding by prohibiting a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of paro......