Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 13–14590.
| Citation | 811 F.3d 434 (Mem) |
| Decision Date | 02 February 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 13–14590.,13–14590. |
| Parties | Earl E. GRAHAM, as PR of Faye Dale Graham, deceased, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Defendants–Appellants, Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit) |
811 F.3d 434 (Mem)
Earl E. GRAHAM, as PR of Faye Dale Graham, deceased, Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Defendants–Appellants,
Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al., Defendants.
No. 13–14590.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 2, 2016.
Elizabeth Joan Cabraser, Kenneth S. Byrd, Jordan S. Elias, Richard M. Heimann, Kent L. Klaudt, Sarah Robin London, Robert J. Nelson, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Samuel Issacharoff, New York University School of Law, New York, NY, Frederick C. Baker, Rebecca M. Deupree, Donald Alan Migliori, Lance V. Oliver, Motley Rice, LLC, Mount Pleasant, SC, Kathryn E. Barnett, Law Office of Morgan & Morgan, Nashville, TN, Janna M. Blasingame, Stephanie J. Hartley, Richard Lantinberg, Edward I. Warren, Norwood Wilner, The Wilner Firm, PA, Charles Easa Farah, Jr., Farah & Farah, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff–Appelle.
Gregory G. Katsas, Hilary R. Mehrkam, Jones Day, Washington, DC, Stephanie Ethel Parker, David M. Monde, John M. Walker, John F. Yarber, Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, Keri Arnold, Arnold & Porter, LLP, New York, NY, Cecilia M. Bidwell, William Patrick Geraghty, James B. Murphy, Jr., Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Tampa, FL, Dana G. Bradford, II, Smith Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Jacksonville, FL, Andrew Brenner, Karen C. Dyer, Mark Jurgen Heise, Stephen N. Zack, Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Miami, FL, Joshua Reuben Brown, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Orlando, FL, Paul D. Clement, Bancroft PLLC, Washington, DC, Bonnie C. Daboll, Cathy Ambersley Kamm, Terri Lynn Parker, Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Tampa, FL, Timothy James Fiorta, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, Khalil Gharbieh, David E. Kouba, Arnold & Porter, LLP, Washington, DC, Stacey Koch Lieberman, Hughes Hubbard & Reed, LLP, Miami, FL, Charles Richard Allan Morse, Jones Day, New York, NY, Robert B. Parrish, J.W. Prichard, Jr., David C. Reeves, Jeffrey Alan Yarbrough, Moseley Prichard Parrish Knight & Jones, Jacksonville, FL, Kenneth J. Reilly, Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Miami, FL, Stephanie Sowers Sankar, Connor Jay Sears, Shook Hardy &...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Berger v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
...as the Eleventh Circuit described it in Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 782 F.3d 1261, 1265–67 (11th Cir.2015), vacated 811 F.3d 434 (11th Cir.2016), Walker v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 734 F.3d 1278, 1281–86 (11th Cir.2013), and Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas , 110 So.3d 419, 4......
-
Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
...companies were negligent. Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 782 F.3d 1261, 1273 (11th Cir. 2015), reh'g en banc granted, op. vacated, 811 F.3d 434 (11th Cir. 2016). The district court treated those findings as having already been established. Id. For the claims of negligence and strict ......
-
League of Conservation Voters v. Trump
...as recognized by Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 782 F.3d 1261, 1278–79 (11th Cir. 2015), reh'g en banc granted, opinion vacated , 811 F.3d 434 (11th Cir. 2016), and on reh'g en banc , 857 F.3d 1169 (11th Cir. 2017).30 See Docket 56 at 19–28.31 See Docket 45 at 8–11, 13–24.32 Lujan v.......
-
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Marotta
...conclusion in Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 782 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2015), reh'g en banc granted, opinion vacated , 811 F.3d 434 (11th Cir. 2016). In Graham , the federal court held that Engle progeny product liability claims are implicitly preempted by federal law. Id. at 1280. Th......