Graham v. State, CR–14–1652.
Decision Date | 12 February 2016 |
Docket Number | CR–14–1652. |
Parties | Jessica Porter GRAHAM v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Alabama Supreme Court 1150831.
Benjamin Joseph Freeman, Dothan, for appellant.
Luther Strange, atty. gen., and James B. Prude, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
Jessica Porter Graham was convicted of child abuse, see § 26–15–3, Ala.Code 1975, and was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. Graham's sentence was split, and she was ordered to serve two years' imprisonment followed by three years' probation. The trial court ordered Graham to pay a $100 fine, a $100 crime-victims-compensation assessment, a $350 bail-bond fee, $2,000 in attorney fees, and court costs.
The State's evidence at trial tended to show the following: On February 18, 2014, Graham and her husband, Donnell Graham, brought J.G., their seven-week-old child, to the emergency room at Southeast Alabama Medical Center ("SAMC") because, they claimed, Donnell had fallen down some stairs while he was holding J.G. Dr. James Scott Burrow, a physician at SAMC, testified that he became involved in J.G.'s case after the Department of Human Resources was notified of J.G.'s injuries.
Dr. Burrow testified that an X-ray of the injury for which J.G. was brought to the hospital showed an "obvious break" that had occurred approximately one to three days before that X-ray was taken. (R. 161.) Dr. Burrow and his partner became concerned and conducted a skeletal survey
—an X-ray of J.G.'s entire skeletal system—"to look for any other unusual findings." (R. 161.) The skeletal survey revealed "some old rib fractures" and "a forearm fracture... that was already healing." (R. 162.) On one X-ray, Dr. Burrow observed a bone callus, indicating that a fracture on J.G.'s ulna was in the process of healing.1 Dr. Burrow explained that a bone callus is a (R. 159–60.) Dr. Burrow testified, "[W]hen you start to see fractures that are in various stages of healing or are old, that is a telltale sign or a huge red flag for us that something has happened and this child has been battered." (R. 162.) Dr. Burrow testified that babies' bones are more difficult to break than older children's and adults' bones and that it would require a fair amount of force to fracture a baby's bone. Dr. Burrow testified that, in his opinion, J.G.'s injuries occurred at different times and were intentionally inflicted.
Dr. Lauren Beth Morris, a pediatrician at Southeastern Pediatrics, testified that she examined J.G. the morning following his birth in December 2013. Dr. Morris noted that J.G. had tolerated delivery well and that nothing during her examination of J.G. indicated that he had suffered any trauma during birth. Dr. Morris testified: (R. 80.) Dr. Morris testified that J.G.'s test results were negative for brittle-bone disease
.
Dr. Morris testified that, from her experience, it is not normal for a seven-week-old child to have suffered multiple fractures. Dr. Morris examined J.G.'s X-rays in court and testified that the fractures (R. 60–61.) Dr. Morris characterized J.G.'s fractures as non-accidental.
Investigator Ronald Hall of the Dothan Police Department testified that he interviewed Graham on February 19, 2014. Investigator Hall testified that Graham informed him that she was J.G.'s caretaker "90 to 95 percent of the time." (R. 94.) Graham told Investigator Hall that J.G. "had urinated on her while changing a diaper" and that she became "a little aggravated by that." (R. 94.) Graham further stated that, on February 14, 2014, J.G. was at home alone with Donnell, who "had alleged to have fallen down the steps at the house." (R. 94.) The following day, Graham requested to speak to Investigator Hall again. Graham informed Investigator Hall that she had forgotten to mention that J.G. had once fallen 10–12 inches off a bed and landed on the floor. Investigator Hall further testified that, "on more than one occasion, [Graham] indicated that she pretty much knew what had caused [J.G.]'s injuries, and she refused to talk about those incidents." (R. 94.) Graham informed Investigator Hall that J.G. never received professional medical treatment immediately following any of the incidents during which he may have been injured.
Susie Peters, a juvenile investigator2 with the Dothan Police Department, also interviewed Graham. Investigator Peters testified:
(R. 106–07.) Investigator Peters confirmed that Graham never indicated that she sought medical care for J.G. after those incidents. Investigator Peters further testified that Graham felt that Donnell was too rough while handling J.G. and that, to her knowledge, Graham never reported her concerns to health-care or law-enforcement personnel.
Debra Porter, Graham's mother, testified that, after the February 18, 2014, emergency-room visit, J.G. was placed in her and her husband's care. Porter testified that, initially, J.G. was fussy and that he had a splint on his arm. Porter testified that, at the time of trial, J.G. was 19 months old, that he seemed to be a healthy, happy toddler, and that he had suffered no fractures since living with them.
After the State rested, Graham moved for a judgment of acquittal, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the case, stating:
(R. 186–89.)
In response to Graham's motion for a judgment of acquittal, the State argued that it had proven a prima facie case of child abuse and summarized the evidence presented against Graham during its case-in-chief. The State asserted that it sought to prove that Graham had committed child abuse on the theory that she had failed to seek medical treatment for J.G. or that she failed to prevent abuse or neglect from occurring. The State clarified that it had elected not to pursue a conviction for child abuse on the theory that Graham had actually caused J.G.'s injuries. The State also explained that "the break on February 14th, 2014, is not what we're alleging as the child abuse." (R. 198.)
The trial court denied Graham's motions. The court explained that it relied on ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hubbard v. State
...guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." Breckenridge v. State, 628 So.2d 1012, 1018 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993) (quoted in Graham v. State, 210 So.3d 1148, 1153-54 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016) ).In order to prove a violation of § 36-25-5(b), Ala. Code 1975, the State had to prove: that Hubbard was a public......
-
Cooner v. State
...So.2d 895, 899 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997) (quoting Ward v. State, 610 So.2d 1190, 1191–92 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992) )." Graham v. State, 210 So.3d 1148, 1154 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016). "As this Court has stated:" ‘[B]ecause intent is a state of mind, it is rarely susceptible of direct or positive pro......
-
Harris v. State
...So.2d 895, 899 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997) (quoting Ward v. State, 610 So.2d 1190, 1191–92 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992) )." Graham v. State, 210 So.3d 1148, 1153-54 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016).This Court in Woods v. State, 724 So.2d 40 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997), considered the term "willful maltreatment" cont......
-
Contreras v. State
...person" from willfully refusing to obtain medical care for an injured child the person is responsible for); see also Graham v. State, 210 So.3d 1148 (Ala.Crim.App.2016). Thus, the aggravated-child-abuse statute—in addition to prohibiting Contreras from causing serious physical injury to Ava......