Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc., 15090.

Decision Date26 April 1965
Docket NumberNo. 15090.,15090.
Citation344 F.2d 775
PartiesJohn J. GRAHAM and Warren H. Graham, Appellants, v. TRIANGLE PUBLICATIONS, INC. (counterclaimants) (Appellee), v. John J. GRAHAM et al. (counterdefendants), and Delaware Valley Newsdealers' Association (additional counterdefendant).
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Richard C. Bull, White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa. (W. Wilson White and Michael H. Malin, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

William T. Coleman, Jr., Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Kohn & Dilks, Philadelphia, Pa. (Harold E. Kohn, David H. Marion, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, home delivery carriers, brought this antitrust action to enjoin the defendant, Triangle Publications, Inc., from refusing to sell and deliver the Philadelphia Inquirer to them and to recover treble damages. Defendant counterclaimed against the plaintiffs and a number of other suburban newsdealers and a newsdealer's association, whom they joined, claiming that they conspired to fix the resale price of the Inquirer in violation of the antitrust law.

On plaintiffs' application for a preliminary injunction a number of questions were presented to the court below. Was the defendant's alleged refusal to deal with the plaintiffs or others who violated the fixed retail dealer price of the Inquirer a unilateral refusal to deal or was it a subject of agreement with other dealers? What is the effect of the McGuire Act (15 U.S.C. § 45) and the Pennsylvania Fair Trade Act (Act of June 5, 1935, P.L. 266, § 1, as amended, 73 P.S. § 7) on such practices? What meaning is to be given in the present circumstances to the provisions of these statutes limiting their coverage to products in "free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others" (15 U.S.C. § 45; see also 73 P.S. § 7) in the light of the construction which they have received by the Federal and Pennsylvania courts? See especially Gillette Co. v. Master, 408 Pa. 202, 212-213, 182 A.2d 734 (1962); Gulf Oil Corp. v. Mays, 401 Pa. 413, 418, 164 A.2d 656 (1960); Schering Corp. v. Martin Wholesale Distributors, Inc., 212 F. Supp. 325 (E.D.Pa. 1962).

In the present preliminary stage of the controversy we shall refrain from expressing any opinion on the merits of these questions. For what is before us is an appeal from the refusal of the District Judge to grant a preliminary injunction. In such circumstances our review is limited to the determination whether the court below abused its discretion....

To continue reading

Request your trial
49 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Story
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • December 28, 1981
    ...of a party who has failed to meet a burden of proof. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc., 233 F.Supp. 825 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff'd. 344 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1965). See also Stone New Schiller Bldg., Loan Ass'n., 293 Pa. 161, 142 A.2d 293 (1928). In the instant case, it would be extremely inappro......
  • Philadelphia World Hockey Club, Inc. v. Philadelphia Hockey Club, Inc., Civ. A. No. 72-1661
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • November 8, 1972
    ...been said that `. . . to doubt is to deny.'" Graham v. Triangle Publication, Inc., 233 F. Supp. 825, 829 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff'd, 344 F.2d 775 (3rd Cir. 1965.) On the basis of the present record as to the § 1 issues, I have some doubts on the WHA's probability of ultimate success. The sports f......
  • Bowen v. New York News, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 23, 1973
    ...S.Ct. 745, 95 L.Ed. 1035 (1951); Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc., 233 F.Supp. 825, 830-831 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff'd per curiam 344 F. 2d 775 (3d Cir. 1965); Mead Johnson & Co. v. West Chester Discount, Health & Vitamin Center, Inc., 212 F.Supp. 310 (E.D.Pa.1962). See also General Electric......
  • Com. v. Story
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1982
    ...of a party who has failed to meet a burden of proof. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc., 233 F.Supp. 825 (E.D.Pa.1964), aff'd. 344 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1965). See also Stone v. New Schiller Bldg., Loan Ass'n., 293 Pa. 161, 142 A.2d 293 In the instant case, it would be extremely inappropriat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Private Antitrust Suits
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Law Developments (Ninth Edition) - Volume I
    • February 2, 2022
    ...See, e.g., John J. & Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publ’ns, 233 F. Supp. 825, 832 n.24 (E.D. Pa. 1964), aff’d per curiam on other grounds , 344 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1965). 551. See, e.g., CSU Holdings v. Xerox Corp., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6115, at *9 (D. Kan. 1995); Higgins v. Med. Coll., 849 F......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Law Developments (Ninth Edition) - Volume II
    • February 2, 2022
    ...F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2009), 339, 1630 John J. &Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publ’ns, 233 F. Supp. 825 (E.D. Pa. 1964), aff ’ d per curiam, 344 F.2d 775 (3d Cir. 1965), 880 John Lenore & Co. v. Olympia Brewing Co., 550 F.2d 495 (9th Cir. 1977), 453 Johnny Prescott & Son Oil Co. v. Rymes Heatin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT