Grames v. King

• Decision Date: 13 May 1985
• Docket Number: 71313,Nos. 71312,s. 71312
• Citation: 368 N.W.2d 219,422 Mich. 887
• Parties: Tamara L. GRAMES, Barbara S. Grames and Harry E. Grames, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Rose KING and Patricia King, and their parents, Minnie King and Mr. King, Glenda Johnson and her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Johnson, Defendants, and The Pontiac School District, the Pontiac Board of Education, Joe Earl Carr, Allison Naomi Moore, Hercules Renda and Dana P. Whitmer, Defendants-Appellees. Tamara L. GRAMES, Barbara A. Grames and Harry E. Grames, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Rose KING, et al., Defendants, and The Walled Lake School District, the Walled Lake Board of Education, Kenneth W. Butler, Richard Schneider, Tom Evans, Gerald Wallace and Dr. Donald Sheldon, Defendants-Appellees. 422 Mich. 887, 368 N.W.2d 219, 25 Ed. Law Rep. 538
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court

Page 219

368 N.W.2d 219

Tamara L. GRAMES, Barbara S. Grames and Harry E. Grames, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Rose KING and Patricia King, and their parents, Minnie King and Mr. King, Glenda Johnson and her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Johnson, Defendants,

and

The Pontiac School District, the Pontiac Board of Education,

Joe Earl Carr, Allison Naomi Moore, Hercules Renda

and Dana P. Whitmer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Tamara L. GRAMES, Barbara A. Grames and Harry E. Grames, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Rose KING, et al., Defendants, and The Walled Lake School District, the Walled Lake Board of

Education, Kenneth W. Butler, Richard Schneider,

Tom Evans, Gerald Wallace and Dr. Donald

Sheldon,

Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 71312, 71313.

422 Mich. 887, 368 N.W.2d 219, 25 Ed. Law Rep. 538

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 13, 1985.

Prior report: 123 Mich.App. 573.

ORDER

By order of September 15, 1983, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decisions in Ross v. Consumers Power Co. (On Rehearing) (Docket No. 64241) and Bandfield v. Wood (Docket No. 67682). On order of the Court, the decisions having been issued on January 22, 1985, 420 Mich. 567, 363 N.W.2d 641, and on March 19, 1985, 421 Mich. 774, 364 N.W.2d 280, the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm the Court of Appeals judgment as to the school districts and VACATE the judgment as to the individual employees. We REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with Ross v. Consumers Power Co. (On Rehearing) and Bandfield v. Wood.

LEVIN, J., dissented and filed opinion. For text of his dissenting opinion, see Prochazka v. Oak Park, Developmental Training Center, 422 Mich. 886, 368 N.W.2d 214.