Grant Lunch Corp. v. Driscoll

Citation29 A.2d 888,129 N.J.L. 408
Decision Date27 January 1943
Docket NumberNo. 248.,248.
PartiesGRANT LUNCH CORPORATION v. DRISCOLL.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)

Proceeding by Grant Lunch Corporation against Alfred E. Driscoll, Commissioner of the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, for a writ of certiorari to review proceedings and record of New Jersey Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control wherein prosecutor's plenary retail consumption license was suspended for five days for selling whiskey below the current fair trade price. On rule to show cause why writ of certiorari should not issue.

Writ dismissed.

October term, 1942, before CASE, DONGES, and COLIE, JJ.

Morris M. Schnitzer and Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, all of Newark, for prosecutor.

Edward J. Dorton, of Jersey City, for respondent.

CASE, Justice.

Prosecutor seeks a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings and record of the New Jersey Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control wherein the commissioner adjudged that the prosecutor had sold a half gallon bottle of Hiram Walker's "93" rye Whiskey below the minimum consumer price and in violation of Rule 6 of State Regulation No. 30 and ordered that the plenary retail consumption license held by the prosecutor should be suspended for a period of five days. The parties have stipulated that in the event the court should direct a writ to issue the record now before us should be considered as returned pursuant to the writ, to the end that the merits of the controversy be now determined. The pertinent statutes are the Fair Trade Act, R.S. 56:4-3 et seq, N.J. S.A. 56:4-3 et seq, and ch. 208, Pamph. Laws 1938, N.J.S.A. 33:1-23.1 (supplementing R.S. 33:1 wherein the State Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control was given the discretionary authority by rule or regulation to prohibit or regulate the sale of alcoholic beverages in violation of any fair trade contract entered into pursuant to ch. 4, Title 56 of the Revised Statutes). The commissioner promulgated rules and regulations designated "Regulation No. 30", Rules 1 to 8, inclusive, whereby a retail licensee was prohibited upon the penalty of revocation or suspension of license from selling or offering for sale any product covered by a contract between a manufacturer or wholesaler and any licensed New Jersey retailer except at the price stipulated in such contract or the price list accompanying the same, when the contract and price list should have been filed and published and duly bulletined.

On September 27, 1941, prosecutor, which was then the holder of a plenary retail consumption license at 197-201 Market Street and 6-8 Beaver Street, in the City of Newark, sold at that place by mistake and not willfully, but nevertheless in violation of a contract between Hiram Walker Incorporated, as manufacturer or wholesaler, and Gus Waldron Wine and Liquor Store, a licensed retailer, and price lists going therewith and the bulletins of the department bearing thereon, all duly circulated, a bottle of rye Whiskey at the price of $3.19 as against the current "fair trade" price of $3.29.

Prosecutor contends (1) that paragraph 6 of Regulation 30, where invoked to punish sales induced by innocent, non-negligent mistakes as to price, violates due process of law in that it does not express its scope and intended application...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Mazza v. Cavicchia
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 24, 1954
    ...and furthermore that it is entirely reasonable and proper.' 120 N.J.L. at page 598, 1 A.2d at page 26. In Grant Lunch Corp. v. Driscoll, 129 N.J.L. 408, 29 A.2d 888,, 889 (Sup.Ct.1943), affirmed 130 N.J.L. 554, 33 A.2d 900 (E. & A. 1943), certiorari denied 320 U.S. 801, 64 S.Ct. 431, 88 L.E......
  • Cino v. Driscoll
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • September 27, 1943
    ...120 N.J.L. 596, 1 A.2d 25; Gaine v. Burnett, 122 N.J.L. 39, 4 A.2d 37, affirmed 123 N.J.L. 317, 8 A.2d 604; Grant Lunch Corp. v. Driscoll, 129 N.J.L. 408, 410, 29 A.2d 888, affirmed, Err. & App., 33 A.2d 900; State v. Elliott, 129 N.J.L. 169, 170, 28 A.2d 597. Moreover, the legislature char......
  • Butler Oak Tavern v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Dept. of Law and Public Safety
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1956
    ...N.J.S.A., and the discreion of the Director is sufficiently broad to accomplish the purpose intended. Grant Lunch Corporation v. Driscoll, 129 N.J.L. 408, 29 A.2d 888 (Sup.Ct.1943), affirmed 130 N.J.L. 554, 33 A.2d 900 (E. & A.1943), certiorari denied 320 U.S. 801, 64 S.Ct. 431, 88 L.Ed. 48......
  • Appeal of Schneider
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • March 26, 1951
    ...1938); Board of Com'rs of Town of Phillipsburg v. Burnett, 125 N.J.L. 157, 14 A.2d 533 (Sup.Ct. 1940); Grant Lunch Corp. v. Driscoll, 129 N.J.L. 408, 29 A.2d 888 (Sup.Ct. 1943), affirmed 130 N.J.L. 554, 33 A.2d 900 (E. & A. 1943), certiorari denied 320 U.S. 801, 64 S.Ct. 430, 88 L.Ed. 484 T......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT