Grant v. Caprice Management Corporation
Decision Date | 18 September 2007 |
Docket Number | 1496. |
Parties | GINA GRANT, Respondent, v. CAPRICE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al., Defendants, and CAPRIS & CAPRI WINDOW CORP., Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The court properly denied Capris' cross motion for summary judgment in this action in which plaintiff seeks damages for injuries she allegedly sustained when a window installed by Capris fell out of its tracks and struck her in the head as she attempted to close it. Although a contractual obligation, standing alone, will generally not give rise to tort liability in favor of a third person (see Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v Y.B.H. Realty Corp., 76 NY2d 220, 226 [1990]), an exception exists where a contractor who undertakes to perform services pursuant to a contract negligently creates or exacerbates a dangerous condition so as to have "launched a force or instrument of harm" (Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs., 98 NY2d 136, 141-142 [2002], quoting Moch Co. v Rensselaer Water Co., 247 NY 160, 168 [1928]). The allegation that Capris negligently installed the window with defective parts causing it to fall out of its track falls within this exception (see e.g. Bienaime v Reyer, 41 AD3d 400 [2007]; Prenderville v International Serv. Sys., Inc., 10 AD3d 334, 336-338 [2004]). Triable factual issues exist concerning what parts Capris replaced, whether the part was replaced by someone else or whether Capris altered or repaired the spring latch mechanism provided by the window manufacturer prior to or during installation, and whether the window was negligently installed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tuchman v. Deam Props. (Us), LLC
...90 A.D.3d at 447-48; Singh v. United Cerebral Palsy of N.Y. City, Inc., 72 A.D.3d 272, 278 (1st Dep't 2010); Grant v. Caprice Mgt. Corp., 43 A.D.3d 708, 709 (1st Dep't 2007). See Eliasberg v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr., 79 A.D.3d 628 (1st Dep't 2010); Corrales v. Reckson Assoc. Re......
-
Karydas v. Ferrara-Ruurds
...98 N.Y.2d 136, 139, 746 N.Y.S.2d 120, 773 N.E.2d 485 [2002] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see e.g. Grant v. Caprice Mgt. Corp., 43 A.D.3d 708, 841 N.Y.S.2d 555 [1st Dept.2007] ).Regardless of which party had the burden of proof on the Espinal exception, the evidence submitted on the m......
-
Ansbro v. Brookfield Real Props.
... ... , L.P., S&J ENTRANCE & WINDOW SPECIALIST, INC., BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, BROOKFIELD PROPERTY GROUP LLC, and 666 FIFTH ASSOCIATES LLC, ... MADISON SERVICE CORPORATION, Second Third-Party Defendant. 666 FIFTH ASSOCIATES LLC and BSREP III ... citation omitted]). It is rare for a court to grant a ... plaintiff summary judgment based on a res ipsa loquitur ... contractor"] [emphasis removed]; Grant v Caprice ... Mgt. Corp., 43 A.D.3d 708, 709[ 1 st Dept 2007] [issue ... of fact ... ...
-
Matos v. Shelter Rock Homes, Inc.
...harm by failing to properly repair the fence door (see Cohen v. Schacter, 51 A.D.3d 847, 857 N.Y.S.2d 727 ; Grant v. Caprice Mgt. Corp., 43 A.D.3d 708, 841 N.Y.S.2d 555 ; Ocampo v. Abetta Boiler & Welding Serv., Inc., 33 A.D.3d 332, 822 N.Y.S.2d 52 ; Phillips v. Seril, 209 A.D.2d 496, 619 N......