Grant v. Comm'r Of Correction

Decision Date01 July 2010
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesDonnette GRANTv.COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Mary H. Trainer, special public defender, in support of the petition.

James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Donnette Grant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 121 Conn.App. 295, 995 A.2d 641 (2010), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Carter v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 13, 2021
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 121 Conn. App. 295, 298, 995 A.2d 641, cert. denied, 297 Conn. 920, 996 A.2d 1192 (2010). With these principles in mind, we address the petitioner's claims in turn.IThe petitioner first claims that the habeas court err......
  • Fine v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 2013
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 121 Conn. App. 295, 298, 995 A.2d 641, cert. denied, 297 Conn. 920, 996 A.2d 1192 (2010). On appeal, the petitioner argues that the court's finding that he intentionally and knowingly withdrew his prior petition with p......
  • Misenti v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 2016
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 121 Conn. App. 295, 298, 995 A.2d 641, cert. denied, 297 Conn. 920, 996 A.2d 1192 (2010). We now address the specifics of the petitioner's appeal.5 First, the petitioner claims that Grabow was ineffective by failing to......
  • Johnson v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 13, 2016
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 121 Conn. App. 295, 298, 995 A.2d 641, cert. denied, 297 Conn. 920, 996 A.2d 1192 (2010). With that standard in mind, we turn to the petitioner's claim that the habeas court in the present case improperly granted the r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT