Grant v. State, 87
| Decision Date | 09 April 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 87,87 |
| Citation | 473 A.2d 455,299 Md. 309 |
| Parties | William McKlveen GRANT v. STATE of Maryland. Sept. Term 1983. |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals, Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County; Raymond G. Thieme, Jr., Judge.
Case below: 55 Md.App. 1, 461 A.2d 524 (1983).
Sherrie Berger Greenberg and George E. Burns, Jr., Asst. Public Defenders, Baltimore (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, Baltimore, on brief), for appellant.
Jillyn K. Schulze, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore (Stephen H. Sachs, Atty. Gen., Baltimore, on brief), for appellee.
Argued before SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY, COUCH, JJ., and ORTH, CHARLES E., Jr., retired, Specially Assigned, Judge.
The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted, --- Md. ----, 466 A.2d 39, and heard, it is this 9th day of April, 1984.
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, petition having been improvidently granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Collins v. State
...tier. Similarly, in Grant v. State, 55 Md.App. 1, 461 A.2d 524 (1983), cert. granted, 466 A.2d 39 (Md.1983), cert. dismissed, 299 Md. 309, 473 A.2d 455 (1984), the court approved an initial contact by an officer with the defendant and noted that, from the conversation, the answers raised an......
-
Patrick v. State
...of particulars. The rule has no provision for sanctions. Grant v. State, 55 Md.App. 1, 30-31, 461 A.2d 524 (1983), cert. denied, 299 Md. 309, 473 A.2d 455 (1984); see Polisher v. State, 11 Md.App. 555, 587, 276 A.2d 102, cert. denied, 262 Md. 749, and cert. denied, 404 U.S. 984, 92 S.Ct. 44......
-
Robinson v. State
...the same practical end as a bill of particulars”). In Grant v. State, 55 Md.App. 1, 32–33, 461 A.2d 524 (1983), cert. dis'd,299 Md. 309, 473 A.2d 455 (1984), this Court held that, although there was a technical failure of the State in failing to provide an explicit response to a request for......
-
Fitzgerald v. State
...291 (2002). This Court reached the same conclusion in Grant v. State, 55 Md.App. 1, 14-15, 461 A.2d 524 (1983), cert. dismissed, 299 Md. 309, 473 A.2d 455 (1984). They carried the seized suitcase into the airport and exposed it, scrupulously unopened, to the trained nose of a cocaine-sniffi......