Grantham v. State

CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtHALL; HALL
CitationGrantham v. State, 262 S.E.2d 777, 244 Ga. 775 (Ga. 1979)
Decision Date26 November 1979
Docket NumberNo. 35728,35728
PartiesGRANTHAM v. The STATE.

Ben B. Williams, Jr., Fitzgerald, for appellant.

Thomas H. Pittman, Tifton, for appellee.

HALL, Justice.

Certiorari is granted in this case (Grantham v. State, 151 Ga.App. 707, 261 S.E.2d 445 (1979)) to review an alternative holding that the petitioner's attack on the constitutionality of a Georgia Code section was inadequate because it referred to the Code Annotated rather than to the official Code of 1933. The Court of Appeals cited Cooper v. State, 226 Ga. 722, 177 S.E.2d 228 (1970); Widemon v. Burson, 224 Ga. 665, 164 S.E.2d 128 (1968) and Cox v. Burson, 226 Ga. 13(2), 172 S.E.2d 406 (1968).

Years ago it was said: "Probably no phase of pleading in Georgia is fraught with more technicalities than . . . raising constitutional issues." Ga. Procedure and Practice 38, § 2-23 (1957 Ed.).

Under the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Code Ann. § 6-905), pleadings and procedure shall be liberally construed so as to bring about a decision on the merits. See Christiansen v. Robertson, 237 Ga. 711, 229 S.E.2d 472 (1976); Lambert v. City of Atlanta, 242 Ga. 645, 250 S.E.2d 456 (1979); Edmonds v. City of Albany, 242 Ga. 648, 250 S.E.2d 458 (1979). There is no requirement for citation to the official Code rather than to the Code Annotated, and the decisions of this court cited by the Court of Appeals are expressly overruled. See North Ga. Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem., Inc., 230 Ga. 623, 198 S.E.2d 284 (1973).

While we disapprove the procedural ruling of the Court of Appeals, the judgment is not thereby affected.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

HALL, Justice, concurring.

This is my final opinion after over eighteen years of service on the appellate courts of Georgia. They have, indeed, been wonderful years for me, and I will cherish them as long as I live.

I wish to thank the two Governors who appointed me to our two appellate courts and the people of Georgia who permitted me to serve in this state's judicial system.

During my thirteen years on the Court of Appeals I had the pleasure of serving with seventeen members of that court. During almost six years on the Supreme Court, I had the pleasure of serving with nine members of this court. I will always be grateful to these judges and justices for the kindness and assistance they extended to me during my tenure. I am also thankful for the conscientious work of my personal staff and the staffs of both courts who have served with me.

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Cain v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 25, 2002
    ...liberally construed so as to bring about a decision on the merits and to avoid dismissal of cases. See OCGA § 5-6-30; Grantham v. State, 244 Ga. 775, 262 S.E.2d 777 (1979). It is also consonant with our case law recognizing that the courts are not bound by the designation given motions by t......
  • Recoba v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 23, 1986
    ...Accordingly, we will retain jurisdiction. See generally Grantham v. State, 151 Ga.App. 707(1), 261 S.E.2d 445 (1979), aff'd 244 Ga. 775, 262 S.E.2d 777 (1979). 2. The evidence adduced at trial shows that, while appellant was being lawfully detained for purposes of undergoing a field sobriet......
  • Blackmon v. Pena
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 7, 2018
    ...(Hunt, C.J.); Davis v. City of Macon, 262 Ga. 407, 421 S.E.2d 278 (1992) (Weltner, C.J., concurring); Grantham v. State, 244 Ga. 775, 776, 262 S.E.2d 777 (1979) (Hall, J., concurring).2 Sartor Resartus , Sir Thomas Carlyle 93 (Odyssey Press 1937).3 "Thus ye labour, but not for yourselves." ......
  • World Harvest Church v. Guideone Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • October 30, 2009
    ...is merely dicta. The decisional law of Georgia appears to recognize alternative holdings as binding. See, e.g., Grantham v. State, 244 Ga. 775, 262 S.E.2d 777, 777 (1979) (granting certiorari to review an alternative holding); QOS Networks Ltd. v. Warburg, Pincus & Co., 294 Ga.App. 528, 669......
  • Get Started for Free