Gray v. Margot Inc., 14506
Decision Date | 22 December 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 14506,14506 |
Citation | 408 So.2d 436 |
Parties | Jerald W. GRAY v. MARGOT INC., Robert H. Cane, Michael R. Gray, et al. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
L. D. Sledge and Robert E. Goodwin, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant, Jerald W. Gray.
W. Arthur Abercrombie, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee, Travelers Ins. Co.
Felix R. Weill, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee, Robert H. Cane.
Arthur H. Andrews, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee, Aetna Cas. & Sur.
Before CHIASSON, EDWARDS and LEAR, JJ.
This case raises the issue of whether a fellow employee, who is immune from suit by virtue of the Workmen's Compensation Statute, is an uninsured motorist within the meaning of the Louisiana Uninsured Motorist Statute.
Plaintiff, Jerald W. Gray, an employee of Ambulance Service Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., was riding as a medic in an ambulance driven by Michael R. Gray, a co-employee, when it was involved in a collision with another vehicle. At the time of the accident Jerald and Michael Gray were acting within the course and scope of their employment.
Jerald Gray filed suit against a number of defendants, seeking to recover damages for injuries which he sustained in the accident. Among the named defendants was the Travelers Insurance Co., plaintiff's uninsured motorist carrier. Plaintiff's petition alleged that Michael Gray was an uninsured motorist and that Travelers was bound to pay all sums for which the uninsured motorist was liable.
Travelers filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the uninsured motorist provision of plaintiff's insurance policy was not operative because plaintiff was not "legally entitled to recover damages" from Michael Gray. The trial court granted Travelers' motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff's suit against Travelers on the basis that the Workmen's Compensation Law prohibited plaintiff from recovering damages from Michael Gray, his co-employee. Therefore, the trial court held that Michael Gray was not an uninsured motorist under plaintiff's policy since plaintiff was not legally entitled to recover damages from Michael Gray, as required by the Uninsured Motorist Statute and the insurance policy.
Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Plaintiff's insurance policy with Travelers provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
"The company will pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured highway vehicle because of bodily injury sustained by the insured, caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such uninsured highway vehicle...." (Emphasis added.)
Thus, in order for Jerald Gray to recover under the uninsured motorist provision of the policy, he must be "legally entitled to recover" damages from Michael Gray.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Medders v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.
... ... Credit Center, Inc., 444 So.2d 358 (Miss.1983). There, we held that a trial court, when ... Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 442 So.2d 894 (La.Ct.App.1983); Gray v. Margot Inc., 408 So.2d 436 (La.Ct.App.1981); Carlisle v. State Dept ... ...
-
Kough v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'n
...Mayfield v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, 442 So.2d 894 (La.Ct.App.1983), writ den., 445 So.2d 1230 (La.1984); Gray v. Margot Inc., 408 So.2d 436 (La.Ct.App.1981); Carlisle v. State Dept. of Transportation and Development, 400 So.2d 284 (La.Ct.App.1981), Writ Den., 404 So.2d 1256 (La.1981);......
-
Cormier v. National Farmers Union Property & Cas. Co., 890074
... ... Cross-Appellee, ... Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., a North ... Dakota Corporation, Defendant and Appellant ... Civ. No ... Kludt, 317 N.W.2d 43 (Minn.1982); Gray v. Margot Inc., 408 So.2d 436 (La.App.1981); Williams v. Country Mutual ... ...
-
Barfield v. Barfield
...33 Ill.Dec. 139, 396 N.E.2d 528 [1979] neither overrules, nor is its rationale in discord with, Williams, supra ); Gray v. Margot Inc., 408 So.2d 436, 438 [La.App.1981] (workers' compensation immunity); Hopkins v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 41 Mich.App. 635, 638, 200 N.W.2d 784, 786 [19......