Gray v. State

Decision Date09 April 1974
Docket Number8 Div. 378
Citation52 Ala.App. 481,294 So.2d 448
PartiesJohn Rayford GRAY, Jr. v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Clement J. Cartron, Huntsville, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., Montgomery, and Samuel L. Adams, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Dothan, for the State.

TYSON, Judge.

The Grand Jury of Madison County, Alabama, charged the appellant with the robbery of Joseph Ikard, a cab driver for Drake Cab Company, Inc. The Jury found the appellant guilty and fixed his punishment at ten years imprisonment. The trial court then entered its judgment, setting sentence in accordance with this verdict.

Mrs. Angie Burchfield testified that, on the night of August 25, 1972, she was manager of the American Legion Club, located on Triana Boulevard in the City of Huntsville, Alabama. She stated that about 11:00 in the evening the door bell to the club rang; that she opend the door, and as she did so, she looked out and saw a man, whom she recognized as the appellant, fire several shots at a cab driver seated in a cab. She stated that she identified the appellant at Police Headquarters later that evening.

Mr. Earl Wayne Jackson testified that he had been a passenger in a cab driven by one Joe Ikard on the night of August 25, 1972; that Mr. Ikard took him to the American Legion Club at about 11:00 that evening; that he paid his fare, went to the door of the club, rang the bell, and as the door was being opened, he heard at least three shots fired by a man at the cab driver who had brought him to the club, and that he was unable to identify the man he saw running away. On cross-examination, he stated that he was positive that the man he saw was not one Jimmy Knighten.

Mr. Joseph Ikard testified that he was a cab driver for Drake Cab Company in the City of Huntsville on August 25, 1972. He stated that about 11:00 that evening, he took a party to the American Legion Club, located on Triana Boulevard near Bob Wallace Drive. He stated that, after letting his fare out, he waited a few moments, that a man approached him with a pistol and said, 'I had just as soon kill you as look at you.' Mr. Ikard positively identified this man as the appellant, John Gray. He stated that the party first shot him in the hand, then fired again and struck him in the hip, that he reached to get his billfold, and that he shot him in the hand a second time. He stated that at this point he heard the gun snap and that the appellant took the money and ran. He stated that people in the American Legion Club came out and carried him inside the club, that the police were notified.

On cross-examination, Mr. Ikard admitted that when he was in the hospital for treatment, he had been unable to identify the appellant, and that later he selected the photograph of one Jimmy Knighten. He stated that he had been incorrect in his earlier selection of Jimmy Knighten, and that he was positive that the assailant was the appellant, John Gray.

Mr. Steven R. Robinson testified that he was a police officer for the Huntsville Police Department on August 25, 1972. He stated that he was on routine patrol shortly after 11:00 that evening when he received a radio bulletin to proceed to the vicinity of the American Legion Club, that a description of the suspect was broadcast on the police radio. He then proceeded to drive out Bob Wallace Drive toward Triana Boulevard. From the record:

'Q What if anything did you see while you were on Bob Wallace?

'A I saw a subject walking west on Bob Wallace, he was at that time about forty to fifty yards from me. He answered the description that I had received on the radio. I called back on the radio and said that I spotted the possible offender in front of Cinema One on Bob Wallace.

'Q After completing your radio message, what did you do at that point?

'A I observed that the subject had a gun sticking out of his belt; it was in his mid section. He had on no shirt, so the gun was obvious to see. I proceeded on, getting closer. And when I got about, I would say, 30 or 40 yards from the subject, he reached in his belt and got a hold of the gun and came out of his belt with the gun. And I put on the brakes of the patrol car and ducked. The patrol car slid around sideways. I came up out of the seat with my shotgun. Before that I had heard a shot; when I ducked, there was a shot.

'Q You didn't see a shot but you heard a shot?

'A Yes, sir.

'Q What you took to be a gunshot?

'A Yes, sir.

'Q You ducked, then what happened?

'A I grabbed my shotgun and came up out of the seat with my shotgun and put it on the subject that had the gun.

'Q And who was that, sir? Is he here in the Courtroom?

'A Yes, sir, he is.

'Q Would you point him out to the Jury, please?

'A John Gray.'

Police Detective A. C. Edger of the Huntsville Police Department testified that he participated in the investigation of the robbery complaint of the cab driver near the American Legion Club on the night of August 25, 1972. He stated that he interviewed the appellant that evening at Police Headquarters and administered a 'Miranda warning,' that after advising the appellant of his rights, the following statement was given to him:

'A 'Jimmy Knighten came by my house about 5:30 P.M. the 25th of August. We took his daddy home and then we went to the State Store and got some wine. Then we went to Brahm Spring Park to drink the wine. Later we went up town to the AAA Bonding Company. Jimmy paid some on his bond. We went back to the State Store and got some more wine. Then we went to West Huntsville. Jimmy said let's rob somebody. He got a cab at the American Legion Hut. He pulled the gun and told him, the cab driver, to give him his money. He wouldn't give it up at first. Then Jimmy shot him. The cab driver saw Jimmy was serious then and gave him some money. Then Jimmy shot him again. He started to run and handed me the gun and told me to hide it. Then the police car came by and I was arrested. Jimmy ran down the side street by the railroad track. Jimmy shot the cab driver.''

Mr. Edgar Greene, an Assistant District Attorney with the District Attorney's Office of Madison County, Alabama, testified that, approximately a week prior to September 14, 1972, he received the following note:

'Ed Greene--D. A. Will you come up to the Jail. I want to talk to you about the charge against me and Jimmy Knighten. He didn't know anything about the robbery. I will sign a statement saying he didn't. John Gray.'

Mr. Greene testified that he did not talk with the appellant until the morning of the preliminary hearing, which was September 14, 1972, and that the appellant gave him the following statement:

'. . . I then asked him to tell me what had happened, and Gray then stated that he had done the robbery. I asked him what did he do, he said he and Knighten had gotten together and were drinking wine. They went to a store and bought the wine, went down to Braham Springs Park and were drinking it. Knighten had come over to his house to get him to sell him a pistol. While they were there, they went and bought the wine and went out to drink it. While they were in Braham Springs Park, Gray had told Knighten that he would go get the money for the pistol up at his house. Knighten told him to take the pistol and go get the money. Gray said he went up, found a cab driver and took the gun, told the cab driver to give him his money, and then he shot the cab driver one time, the cab driver fell, and he shot him a couple more times. He couldn't remember whether he got any money from him or not. He stated that Knighten wasn't with him and he didn't know anything about it, he did it all himself. He figured the reason he did this was that he was messed up on wine. Then there was some conversation with Knighten. Gray then also stated in response to my question that he was picked up by the police with the gun in his hand walking down the street. Then I talked with Gray, asked him if this was the truth, he said that it was. I then asked him if he understood that such a crime could get him a considerable amount of time in the penitentiary for shooting a cab driver, and he said, 'Yes, he knew that.' I think that was all.'

The appellant's motion to exclude the State's evidence was overruled.

At trial the appellant testified that it was only because of threats by Jimmy Knighten to his wife and child, that he had given the statement to District Attorney Greene. Appellant's version of what occurred on the evening of August 25, 1972, indicated that Jimmy Knighten sold him a pistol that evening; that they had been together drinking beer and wine for several hours in the late afternoon and the early evening; that they drove out Triana Boulevard, that Jimmy Knighten got out of the car, and that he remained in it. From the record:

'Q What was the next thing that happened?

'A Well, he was gone about three or four minutes, and he should have done been back. And I got out looking for him.

'Q Please speak up.

'A He was gone about three or four minutes, and I got out looking for him. I figured he passed out somewhere.

'Q Where did you go?

'A I went toward Triana Blvd. and I heard some shots, and I seen him. And I went over there where he was at, and he run up to me and handed me the gun and said, 'Hide it,' and run.

'Q What did you do?

'A I stuck it in my belt and run.

'Q Stuck it in your belt and ran?

'A Yes, sir.'

The State presented Jimmy Knighten in rebuttal, and he admitted that he had sold the appellant a pistol on the evening of August 25, 1972, and that he had been with him earlier during the evening drinking beer and wine. He stated that they drove toward Dean's Trailer Court, which is about one-half block from the American Legion Club. From the record:

'Q How far is Dean's Trailer Court from the American Legion Hut?

'A About half a block.

'Q This defendant told you he was going to go home and get the money to pay you for the pistol?

'A Yes, sir.

'Q So you all had a car there?

'A Yes, sir.

'Q...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Nguyen v. State, 1 Div. 45
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 10, 1988
    ...the property." "Where more than one person participates in a robbery it is immaterial which one takes the property. Gray v. State, 52 Ala.App. 481, 294 So.2d 448 (1974). Nor must the evidence establish that the defendant personally committed violence against the victim or put the victim in ......
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 4, 1981
    ...to the trial court covering the omitted principle of law in order to preserve the potential error for appellate review. Gray v. State, 52 Ala.App. 48, 294 So.2d 448; Thigpen v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 369 So.2d 291, writ denied, Ala., 369 So.2d "(W)here a party desires the court to extend its o......
  • Colston v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 4, 1975
    ...59 Ala. 106; (State ex rel. Attorney General v. Tally) Tally's Case, 102 Ala. 25, et seq., 15 So. 722.' See also, Gray v. State, 52 Ala.App. 481, 294 So.2d 448 (1974). It is the opinion of this Court, that under the evidence presented, the trial judge in the instant case properly charged th......
  • Hall v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 21, 1979
    ...5, 73 So. 387 (1916); Bowens v. State, 54 Ala.App. 491, 309 So.2d 844, cert. den. 293 Ala. 746, 309 So.2d 850 (1975); Gray v. State, 52 Ala.App. 481, 294 So.2d 448 (1974); Wilder v. State, 52 Ala.App. 157, 290 So.2d 225 Even though the appellant did not properly preserve the question for re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT