Gray v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of State of N.Y.

Decision Date09 January 1997
CitationGray v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of State of N.Y., 651 N.Y.S.2d 740, 235 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
PartiesIn the Matter of Richard E. GRAY et al., Petitioners, v. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

McDermott, Will & Emery (Peter L. Faber, of counsel), New York City, for petitioners.

Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General (Julie S. Mereson, of counsel), Albany, for Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, respondent.

Before CARDONA, P.J., and MIKOLL, WHITE and YESAWICH, JJ.

CARDONA, Presiding Justice.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to Tax Law § 2016) to review a determination of respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal which partially sustained a personal income tax assessment imposed under Tax Law article 22.

Petitioners lived in New York for many years with extensive family, business and social contacts here. After petitioner Richard E. Gray (hereinafter Gray) began experiencing medical problems in the early 1980s, petitioners began to consider moving to a climate that would be better for his health. After petitioners unsuccessfully attempted to build a home in Georgia, they executed a one-year lease in 1985 for a condominium in Amelia Island, Florida. In November 1986, petitioners purchased a lot at the same location and began plans to build a home. Petitioners leased another condominium in Amelia Island from December 1986 to May 1987 and spent the summer of 1987 in the City of Syracuse, Onondaga County. Subsequently, they leased an apartment in Amelia Island from September 15, 1987 to October 1988.

Although petitioners were renting residential property in Florida, they continued to maintain their home in the Village of Fayetteville, Onondaga County, and spent considerable time there. Late in 1986, petitioners started the legal process of transferring ownership of their New York home to a partnership formed by their children. In February 1987, petitioners transferred roughly 40% of the ownership to their children and transferred another 40% in November 1988, leaving petitioners with only a 20% interest in the property. The remaining interest was transferred in 1989. By Gray's own count, through the use of a travel log he had kept, petitioners spent 183 days in Florida and 145 days in New York in 1987. In 1988, they spent 266 days in Florida and 67 days in New York.

With respect to petitioners' business interests, up until September 1987 Gray was the controlling shareholder and chairperson of the board of Gray-Syracuse Inc., a New York-based manufacturing corporation, as well as two smaller corporations. Although Gray was still the controlling shareholder and actively participated in the operation of the various businesses, in the early 1980s he began to reduce his role in the operation of Gray-Syracuse. He was, however, in his own words, "deeply, deeply involved" in the operation of Gray-Syracuse and felt his involvement was "vital to the health of the company". Through 1987 and 1988, he maintained an office in New York for the purpose of conducting business for Gray-Syracuse and the two smaller corporations. He was also seeking potential purchasers for his ownership interest of Gray-Syracuse. A purchaser was eventually located and the sale of his majority interest was completed in September 1987.

Beginning in the early 1980s, Richard Gray began to resign his membership in all but three New York organizations and in 1985 began to join various social organizations in Florida, including groups that required members to be permanent residents of Amelia Island. In September 1985, Richard Gray executed a declaration of domicile and citizenship in Florida. Petitioners were issued Florida driver's licenses in November 1985 and they registered to vote in Florida in February 1986. Furthermore, in 1986, petitioners executed documents, such as passports and living wills, identifying Florida as their residence. In 1986, petitioners began seeing a Florida dentist and in 1988, at the latest, began consulting Florida doctors. By 1988, the bulk of petitioners' charitable contributions were to Florida organizations.

In 1987 and 1988, petitioners filed New York nonresident personal income tax returns. Upon audit of those returns, the Department of Taxation and Finance determined that petitioners were domiciliaries of New York in 1987 and 1988 and issued a notice of deficiency asserting deficiencies in income tax in the amounts of $779,360.50 for 1987 and $60,400.13 for 1988. This determination was appealed to the Division of Tax Appeals. Following a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) and a remittal, it was ultimately found by the ALJ that petitioners were domiciliaries of New York until September 15, 1987 and a recalculation of the deficiency to reflect that finding was ordered. Petitioners thereafter appealed to respondent Tax...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Ingle v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the Dep't of Taxation & Fin.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 31, 2013
    ... ... INGLE, Petitioner,v.TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL OF the DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE OF the STATE of New York et al., Respondents.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.Oct ... affect a change in her lifestyle or related business interests until July 2004 ( see Matter of Gray v. Tax Appeals Trib. of State of N.Y., 235 A.D.2d 641, 643, 651 N.Y.S.2d 740 [1997];Matter of ... ...
  • People v. McFadden
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 23, 2020
    ...189 A.D.3d 2086139 N.Y.S.3d 466The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Duwayne MCFADDEN, ... Gray , 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19, 629 N.Y.S.2d 173, 652 N.E.2d 919 [1995] ... ...
  • Campaniello v. N.Y.S. Div. of Tax Appeals Tribunal
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 10, 2018
    ...161 A.D.3d 132075 N.Y.S.3d 706In the Matter of Thomas CAMPANIELLO, Petitioner,v.NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL et al., Respondents.524039Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third ... of the State of N.Y., 110 A.D.3d 1392, 1393, 973 N.Y.S.2d 877 [2013] ; Matter of Gray v. Tax Appeals Trib. of State of N.Y., 235 A.D.2d 641, 643, 651 N.Y.S.2d 740 [1997] ). Generally ... ...
  • Warnecke v. Tax Appeals Tribunal
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 16, 1998
    ... ... 7042 ... In the Matter of John Carl WARNECKE, Petitioner, ... TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL of the State of New York et al., Respondents ... Supreme Court, Appellate Division, ... Third Department ... established by physical presence and an intent to establish a permanent home (see, Matter of Gray v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of State of N.Y., 235 A.D.2d 641, 651 N.Y.S.2d 740; Matter of Clute v ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Domicile planning - don't take it for granted.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 80 No. 1, January 2006
    • January 1, 2006
    ...and will declarations. Note also that Florida wills provided for a New York probate); see also Gray v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York, 651 N.Y.S.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997). (20) If domicile has been sufficiently established, however, a temporary return to the state of previ......