Grayson v. King

Decision Date08 January 2007
Docket NumberNo. 06-709.,06-709.
CitationGrayson v. King, 127 S.Ct. 1005, 166 L.Ed.2d 712, 549 U.S. 1117, 75 USLW 3343, 75 USLW 3350, 75 USLW 3295 (2007)
PartiesDarrell GRAYSON, petitioner, v. Troy KING, Attorney General of Alabama, et al.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Case below, 460 F.3d 1328.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • McKithen v. Brown
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • July 21, 2008
    ... ... post-conviction DNA testing when the defendant was able to test the evidence at trial "using the best technology available at the time"); Grayson v. King, 460 F.3d 1328, 1339-40 (11th Cir.2006) (similar), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1005, 166 L.Ed.2d 712 (2007); cf. Wade v. Brady, ... ...
  • Grayson v. Allen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • May 21, 2007
    ...Cir.2006). January 8, 2007: The United States Supreme Court denied Grayson's petition for writ of certiorari. Grayson v. King, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1005, 166 L.Ed.2d 712 (2007) F. Intervening Legal Events May 24, 2004: The United States Supreme Court ruled that § 1983 is an appropriate v......
  • Grayson v. Allen
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 16, 2007
    ...he could conduct DNA testing on the evidence. See Grayson v. King, 460 F.3d 1328, 1335 (11th Cir.2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1005, 166 L.Ed.2d 712 (2007). On October 10, 2002, the state trial court denied Grayson's motion for lack of jurisdiction. See id. On November 15, 20......
  • Nader v. Serody
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 8, 2007