Great Northern Utilities Co. v. Public Service Commission
Decision Date | 29 July 1930 |
Docket Number | 6679. |
Citation | 293 P. 294,88 Mont. 180 |
Parties | GREAT NORTHERN UTILITIES CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al. |
Court | Montana Supreme Court |
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing November 25, 1930.
Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clark County; A. J. Horsky Judge.
Suit by the Great Northern Utilities Company against the Public Service Commission of Montana, composed of Dan Boyle and others, and another. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
Reversed and remanded.
L. A Foot, Atty. Gen., L. V. Ketter, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Francis A. Silver, of Helena, for appellants.
Maddox & Church, of Great Falls, Louis P. Donovan, of Shelby, and Gunn, Rasch, Hall & Gunn and E. G. Toomey, all of Helena, for respondents.
The Great Northern Utilities Company, the plaintiff herein, is engaged in the business of furnishing natural gas to the inhabitants of the city of Shelby, Mont. The Public Service Commission of the state of Montana made an order, which is hereinafter referred to, fixing a precise rate or charge to be made by the plaintiff for its product, and requiring the plaintiff to file, on or before a certain date, its schedule of rates in accordance with such order. The plaintiff seeks first, an injunction restraining the Public Service Commission of the state of Montana from enforcing its order; and, second, a decree adjudging such order null and void.
For convenience, the plaintiff herein will be designated as the utility, and the Public Service Commission of Montana as the commission. In so far as material here, the facts may be briefly summarized as follows:
That the utility is a corporation, the defendants Boyle, Dennis, and Young, the commission, and the defendant Foot, the Attorney General of the state of Montana. That the city of Shelby is a municipal corporation. That in 1922 the city of Shelby duly granted to the assignor of the utility a franchise, which was duly accepted, under which franchise the utility acquired the right to manufacture, sell, and distribute to the consumer natural gas within the corporate limits of that city. That in 1923 the utility, in the exercise of such franchise, constructed its plant and began the sale and distribution of natural gas to the inhabitants of Shelby. That in the year 1927 the city council of Shelby granted to the assignor of the Citizens' Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, a franchise similar to that theretofore granted to the utility. That in 1928 the company constructed a system for the distribution of natural gas in Shelby, which is in part a duplication of that of the utility. That the system of distribution of the company is being extended so that eventually it will be an entire duplication of that of the utility. That this plant of the company was constructed and is being operated in competition with that of the utility, without the approval of the commission, except that the commission has approved the schedule of charges filed by the company, and hereinafter set forth. That Shelby is a city of about 2,500 inhabitants. That at all times the utility, through its gas plant or system, has been, is, and will continue to be able to furnish all of the gas required by all of the inhabitants of Shelby. That at the time of the construction of the plant of the company, the utility, with the tentative approval of the commission, was charging for its product the following rates:
First 10,000 cu. ft. per month Next 10,000 ' ' ' ' Next 30,000 ' ' ' ' Next 250,000 ' ' ' ' Over 300,000 ' ' ' '
That the company filed with the commission its schedule of rates for gas, which was approved by the commission, and which charges are as follows:
First 10,000 cubic feet Next 10,000 ' ' Next 30,000 ' ' Next 250,000 ' ' All over 300,000 ' '
That the company began furnishing gas in October, 1928. That at that time the utility had 485 customers. That shortly after October, 1928, 127 of such customers of the utility ceased to purchase gas from the utility and became customers of the company.
Paragraphs XVII and XVIII of the complaint are:
The allegations contained in paragraphs XVII and XVIII are in part admitted and in part denied; the answer as to these paragraphs being as follows:
It is alleged that such order of the commission is violative of the provisions of section 20 or article 15 of the Constitution of the state of Montana, and also of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, in that the commission is without authority to fix minimum rates; also that sections 3906 and 3908, Rev. Codes 1921, violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. These allegations are denied by the answer. The complaint alleges, and the answer admits, that the utility has not and will not comply with such order unless it is determined in this action that such order is valid, and that, unless restrained, the Attorney General will institute criminal proceedings for the enforcement of such order.
The commission found that the schedule of rates of the company is just and reasonable, and made the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial