Green Charitable Trust, Matter of

Decision Date23 November 1988
Docket NumberDocket Nos. 99571,A,BANK--DETROI,99576
Citation431 N.W.2d 492,172 Mich.App. 298
PartiesIn the Matter of Leslie H. Green and Edith C. GREEN CHARITABLE TRUST. MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, St. Peter's Home for Boys, Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Diocese of Michigan, Dean of St. Paul Cathedral, and Comerica Bank--Detroit, Appellees, v. Miles JAFFE, Appellant. Miles JAFEE, Michigan Attorney General, St. Peter's Home for Boys, Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Diocese of Michigan, and Dean of St. Paul Cathedral, Appellees, v. COMERCIAppellant. 172 Mich.App. 298, 431 N.W.2d 492
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

[172 MICHAPP 301] Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Louis J. [172 MICHAPP 302] Caruso, Sol. Gen., and Luis F. Fernandez, Lansing, and Nelson, Wilson & Wilson, P.C. by C. Thomas Wilson and Christopher T. Wilson, and Bodman, Longley & Dahling by Theodore Souris, Charles N. Raimi and M. Kathleen O'Callaghan, Detroit, for petitioners.

Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman by Richard C. Van Dusen, Victor J. Baum, Robert P. Hurlbert, Robert W. Powell and William T. Burgess, Detroit, for Miles Jaffe.

Warner, Norcross & Judd by Harold S. Sawyer and Joseph G. Scoville, Grand Rapids, for Comerica Bank--Detroit.

Before BEASLEY, P.J., and HOOD and TAHVONEN, * JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

Respondents, Comerica Bank and Miles Jaffe, appeal as of right from an order of visiting Oakland County Probate Judge George E. Benko which removed respondents as trustees of the Leslie H. Green and Edith C. Green Charitable Trust, removed Comerica as personal representative of the estate of Edith C. Green, deceased and surcharged respondents in the amount of $1,900,000. The petitioners are the Michigan Attorney General, St. Peter's Home for Boys, Bishop of the Episcopal Church--Diocese of Michigan, Dean of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul, and the Cathedral Church of St. Paul. This case is based on the petitioners' objections to respondents' sale of real property owned by the estate and charitable trust to Maurice Cohen, a client of respondent Jaffe.

Leslie and Edith Green owned and maintained a residence on 315 acres in Bloomfield Township, Oakland County, known as Turtle Lake Farms.

[172 MICHAPP 303] In 1969, Leslie and Edith Green created a charitable trust funded in part by a grant of an interest in Turtle Lake Farms. As finally amended, the beneficiaries of this trust are St. Peter's Home for Boys, the Cathedral Church of St. Paul and the Cathedral of the Episcopal Church, Diocese of Michigan. The named trustees were the Greens, Comerica and Miles Jaffe.

Mr. Green died in 1973. His will gave Mrs. Green a life estate in the portion of Turtle Lake Farms including their residence and created a marital trust for the benefit of his wife during her lifetime. The charitable trust was made the residuary beneficiary of the marital trust and would receive the marital trust's interest in Turtle Lake Farms upon Mrs. Green's death. Comerica was named sole trustee of the marital trust.

Mrs. Green died in March, 1983. Her will made specific bequests totaling $320,000 and directed the establishment of a million dollar trust fund for her granddaughter. The residue of her estate was left to the charitable trust. Mrs. Green's estate consisted of cash and securities valued at $1,340,000, plus her interest in Turtle Lake Farms. Comerica was designated personal representative of the estate.

Upon Mrs. Green's death, Bishop McGehee and Dean Herlong of the Episcopal Church became co-trustees of the charitable trust as provided for under the trust. Under the trust, only Comerica and Jaffe were empowered to make decisions regarding the disposition of the real property.

According to respondents, soon after Mrs. Green's death they determined that the liquid assets of the estate were insufficient to satisfy the cash bequests, the funding of the $1,000,000 trust fund for the granddaughter, the estate taxes and the administrative expenses. After reviewing the [172 MICHAPP 304] options, Comerica and Jaffe concluded that the interests of the estate and its beneficiaries would best be served by the sale of the Turtle Lake property.

At Mrs. Green's death, three entities owned undivided interests in Turtle Lake: the Edith Green estate, the marital trust, and the charitable trust. For the sale, Comerica acted in three capacities: as executor of the estate, as sole trustee of the marital trust, and as one of the trustees of the charitable trust. Jaffe also acted in several capacities. He was a trustee of the charitable trust. Also, Jaffe and his firm, Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn, were attorneys for the estate, for Comerica as executor, for Comerica as trustee of the marital trust, and for Comerica as trustee of the charitable trust. The record also contains testimony of Dean Herlong to the effect that Jaffe, at least on one occasion, provided legal advice to him in his role as trustee. Jaffe had been a personal friend of the Greens, as well as their attorney. He drafted their wills and the trust instruments.

During the time between Leslie Green's death and the death of his wife, Comerica's trust department received inquiries from individuals interested in purchasing Turtle Lake Farms. Since the intent was for Mrs. Green to live out her life on the property, Comerica informed inquiring developers that the property was not on the market and that they would be notified when it became available. The parties' briefs describe in detail the events following Mrs. Green's death and leading up to the sale of the Homestead, the real property concerned in this action. The Homestead is the western portion of the Turtle Lake property, consisting of 211 acres and including the Green's mansion and other buildings, Turtle Lake, and lakefront property on Upper Long Lake. [172 MICHAPP 305] On September 15, 1983, Comerica accepted an offer from Maurice Cohen for the Homestead. The sale was closed on November 1, 1983, by execution of a land contract for $3,250,000, with $1,500,000 down payment and the balance over two years at twelve percent interest. Maurice Cohen is a successful real estate developer and was represented by the Honigman firm.

This case concerns the objections by the charitable trust beneficiaries to Jaffe's and his law firm's conflicts of interest in representing both buyer and seller, to Comerica's management of the sale of the property, and to the adequacy of the price received for the Homestead.

At this point, it may be helpful to identify the remaining individuals involved.

Testifying for Comerica were Gari Kersten and Cleveland Thurber. Kersten was vice president of Comerica's trust real estate department which supervised the management of trust real estate and the Comerica representative who apparently worked most closely with Jaffe on the sale of property. Thurber was in charge of Comerica's trust department, which generally oversaw the trust, and one of the trust officers who participated in decisions to sell the property to and accept the Cohen offer. Another Comerica employee, the sales manager, Mr. Keating, apparently supplied information to Kersten on the value of the property. David Wind was another trust officer involved in various decisions. Neither of these two men testified.

Leo Majzels, who had done an appraisal of the property in 1973, was retained by Comerica following Mrs. Green's death as part of the efforts to prepare a marketing plan and as a consultant to assist in evaluating the value of the property. [172 MICHAPP 306] Calvin Hall was retained to submit a development plan on the possible uses of the land. Donald Tilton was retained to study possible environmental problems caused by the wetlands on the property.

Also testifying was Paul C. Robertson, a local land developer and builder, who had expressed interest in developing the property prior to Mrs. Green's death and who contacted Comerica regarding the property again in May, 1983.

The Attorney General is a petitioner as a necessary party in interest to estate proceedings involving charitable trusts. M.C.L. Sec. 14.254(c); M.S.A. Sec. 26.1200(4)(c).

While specific facts will be raised where relevant, an overview of the factual basis for this case may also be helpful at this point.

Maurice Cohen visited the Homestead in April, 1983, and expressed an interest in purchasing the Green residence and a few surrounding acres. Kersten told Cohen that the sale of such a small parcel was not desirable because it would reduce the marketability of the balance of the property. Jaffe put Cohen in touch with Calvin Hall and showed Cohen Hall's development plan to encourage Cohen's interest in a larger parcel. Throughout the summer, Jaffe continued to meet with Cohen to encourage him to make a suitable offer for the entire parcel.

According to Jaffe, when he realized in August that Cohen was interested in making "a hard offer" on the entire Homestead, he informed Thurber that there was a potential conflict of interest because his law firm represented Cohen. In a letter of August 12 to Thurber, Jaffe requested the consent of Comerica, Bishop McGehee and Dean Herlong, as trustees, to the Honigman firm's dual representation and indicated that, in any event, [172 MICHAPP 307] Jaffe would not act as co-trustee with respect to any offer by Cohen. It does not appear that Jaffe sent copies of the letter directly to Bishop McGehee or Dean Herlong.

On August 18, at a meeting of Comerica representatives and Honigman attorneys, Majzels expressed his opinion that the Homestead should sell for between $3 and $3.5 million.

On August 22, all of the trustees of the charitable trust met to discuss the possible sale of the land and the question of dual representation. Dean Herlong testified that Thurber informed them of the estate's cash needs and Jaffe discussed the various problems with development of the property. Jaffe, Thurber and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Hart v. Comerica Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • February 24, 1997
    ...N.W.2d 765, 769 (1988); In re Powell Estate, 160 Mich.App. 704, 712-14, 408 N.W.2d 525, 529-30 (1987); In re Green Charitable Trust, 172 Mich.App. 298, 326-27, 431 N.W.2d 492, 504 (1988); Wisdom v. Neal, 568 F.Supp. 4, 6 (D.N.M.1982); See also, Darr v. Schroer, Rice, Bryan & Lykins, 1989 WL......
  • Hashem v. Les Stanford Oldsmobile, Inc., Docket No. 245939
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • June 7, 2005
    ...testimony on appeal. Consequently, appellate review of the admissibility of that testimony is precluded. In re Green Charitable Trust, 172 Mich.App. 298, 329, 431 N.W.2d 492 (1988). Moreover, the argument is factually flawed.13 Although the record indicates that testing of Hassan Bazzi shor......
  • Miller v. Riverwood Recreation Center, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 27, 1996
    ...a duty." Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 426 Mich. 127, 136, 393 N.W.2d 161 (1986); In re Green Charitable Trust, 172 Mich.App. 298, 315, 431 N.W.2d 492 (1988). Furthermore, a claim of bad faith cannot be based upon negligence or bad judgment if "the actions were made ......
  • In re Trust of Mary Baker Eddy
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • June 14, 2019
    ...and that we need not accept allegations that are mere conclusions of law).Second Church further relies upon Matter of Green Charitable Trust, 172 Mich.App. 298, 431 N.W.2d 492 (1988), to argue that the trustees' mismanagement is sufficient to confer standing. In Green Charitable Trust, name......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Trustee's Duty to Inform Under the Colorado Probate Code
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 38-11, November 2009
    • Invalid date
    ...CRS § 15-16-307. 49. Allard v. Pacific Nat'l Bank, 663 P.2d 104 (Wash. 1983). 50. Wash. Rev. Code § 11.100.140. 51. See Green v. Jaffe, 431 N.W.2d 492 (Mich.App. 1988). 52. Rippey v. Denver U.S. Nat'l Bank, 273 F.Supp. 718 (D.Colo. 1967). 53. In re Sol Brooks Irrevocable Trust No. 1, 596 P.......
1 provisions
  • Act 66, SB 422 – Uniform Trust Code
    • United States
    • South Carolina Session Laws
    • January 1, 2005, closely-held business interests, and other assets that are difficult to value or to replace. See In re Green Charitable Trust, 431 N.W. 2d 492 (Mich. Ct. App. Allard v. Pacific National Bank, 663 P.2d 104 (Wash. 1983). The trustee is justified in not providing such advance disclosur......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT