Green Thumb Corp. v. Britten, UU-453
| Decision Date | 06 February 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. UU-453,UU-453 |
| Citation | 393 So.2d 613 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | GREEN THUMB CORPORATION and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Appellants, v. Dorothy BRITTEN, Appellee. |
Frederick J. Daniels, Orlando, for appellants.
Curtis B. Goff, Orlando, for appellee.
The carrier appeals the deputy commissioner's order awarding Britten reimbursement for travel expenses related to her medical treatment. We reverse.
This is the second appeal in this case. In 1978, a judge of industrial claims awarded benefits and Britten appealed, arguing, among other things, that the judge erred in failing to determine the issue of mileage reimbursement. The Industrial Relations Commission affirmed without comment.
Subsequently, Britten renewed her request for mileage reimbursement. The carrier, while stipulating to the number of miles at issue, argued she was not entitled to reimbursement. The deputy awarded $118.02, plus $125.00 in attorney's fees, representing all of the mileage claimed.
Britten's original claim filed in 1976 included a request for remedial treatment and mileage. In 1978, the parties' pre-trial stipulation and the judge's order both reflected that the question of mileage was at issue. There is no indication that Britten withdrew her claim for mileage, but the order contained no express rejection of that item. See Orlando v. Exxon Company, U.S.A., IRC Order 2-3040 (September 29, 1976). Although the claim for mileage was mature at the time of the hearing, Britten's attorney did not present evidence on this issue.
Absent the withdrawal of the claim or the continuation of the cause or a permissible reservation of jurisdiction by the deputy commissioner, we find the 1978 deputy's order to be res judicata in making no award for the item claimed. Florida's Workers' Compensation Law provides a mechanism for re-opening an adjudicated claim if there has been a change of condition or a mistake of fact. Section 440.28, Florida Statutes. However, Britten presents no ground for invoking that relief.
Therefore, the deputy erred in awarding Britten reimbursement for travel costs incurred before the 1978 order. The order now appealed is proper insofar as it awards mileage reimbursement for travel relating to ordered or authorized treatment after the original order.
Accordingly, the order is reversed and remanded for recomputation of mileage reimbursement and attorney's fees.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
...denial, depending upon whether the claimant presented evidence in support of the claim at trial. For example, in Green Thumb Corp. v. Britten, 393 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), the claimant made a claim for reimbursement of travel expenses associated with medical treatment, but presented n......
-
Artigas v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.
...compensation claims which are not timely litigated may be waived by application of the doctrine of res judicata. Green Thumb Corp. v. Butten, 393 So.2d 613 (Fla.1st DCA 1981). Except under limited circumstances, compensation orders are governed by the same principles of res judicata as appl......
-
Northwest Orient Airlines v. Gonzalez
...was mature at the time of the earlier proceeding, but that Gonzalez had failed to present evidence thereon. See Green Thumb Corp. v. Britten, 393 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). However, the E/C presented no such evidence. In fact, the record shows that the knee condition did not concern the......
-
Hunt v. International Minerals and Chemical Corp.
...they are ripe. This procedure neither requires nor permits piecemeal litigation of claims after maturity. In Green Thumb Corp. v. Britten, 393 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), we held that an order, which did not grant a claim for medical mileage then due, should be regarded as dispositive of......