Green v. Jones

Citation14 So. 630,102 Ala. 303
PartiesGREEN v. JONES.
Decision Date18 January 1894
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

Appeal from circuit court, Russell county; J. M. Carmichael, Chancellor.

Action by Rufus Jones, as surviving partner of the firm of Jones Bros., against Cherry Green. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Reversed.

L. W. Martin, for appellant.

McCLELLAN, J.

This action is prosecuted by Rufus Jones, as surviving partner of the firm of Jones Bros. The complaint is in debt, on an open account. Defendant, Green, interposed the following plea: "*** And now comes the defendant, and, for plea and answer to the plaintiff's cause of action, says that she is not intended to the plaintiff in the form and manner complained of, nor is she indebted to the plaintiff in any amount, and of this she puts herself upon the country." This plea was filed October 8, 1892. On October 20, 1892, the cause was continued by consent. On April 25, 1893, a judgment by default was rendered against the defendant in favor of Jones Bros., with writ of inquiry. The defendant having interposed her plea, it was manifestly erroneous to enter judgment by default against her. Grigg v. Gilmer, 54 Ala. 425.

The judgment was also irregular, in that it was entered in favor of Jones Bros., the suit being in the name of Rufus Jones alone, as surviving partner of the late firm of Jones Bros. Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Skelton v. Weaver
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • March 21, 1957
    ...the court commits error to reversal if it renders a judgment by default or nil dicit. McCoy v. Harrell, 40 Ala. 232; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; Clements v. Mayfield Woolen Mills, 128 Ala. 332, 29 So. 10. 'But if defendant interposes only an affirmative defense by way of confe......
  • Lokey v. Ward
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • May 10, 1934
    ...... reversal if it renders a judgment by default or nil dicit. McCoy v. Harrell, 40 Ala. 232; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; Clements v. Mayfield Woolen Mills, 128 Ala. 332, 29 So. 10. . . But if. defendant interposes only ......
  • Linch v. Scott
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1922
    ...is error without injury. Glass & Co. v. Paulk, 83 Ala. 404, 3 So. 800; Elyton Land Co. v. Morgan, 88 Ala. 434, 7 So. 249; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; McCoy v. Harrell, 40 Ala. 232; Warehouse Co. v. Street, 137 Ala. 621, 34 So. 903. A judgment nil dicit will be sustained, altho......
  • Garnett v. Scott
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • April 6, 1922
    ...plaintiff's averred claims. Hall v. Nix, 156 Ala. 423, 47 So. 335; Langdon v. Williams, 22 Ala. 681; Grigg v. Gilmer, supra; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; Clements v. Mayfield Woolen Mills, 128 Ala. 332, So. 10; Barnard v. Irwin, 8 Ala. App. 544, 62 So. 963. A slight analogy is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT