Green v. Jones
| Decision Date | 18 January 1894 |
| Citation | Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630 (Ala. 1894) |
| Parties | GREEN v. JONES. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Russell county; J. M. Carmichael Chancellor.
Action by Rufus Jones, as surviving partner of the firm of Jones Bros., against Cherry Green. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Reversed.
L. W Martin, for appellant.
This action is prosecuted by Rufus Jones, as surviving partner of the firm of Jones Bros. The complaint is in debt, on an open account. Defendant, Green, interposed the following plea "*** And now comes the defendant, and, for plea and answer to the plaintiff's cause of action, says that she is not intended to the plaintiff in the form and manner complained of, nor is she indebted to the plaintiff in any amount, and of this she puts herself upon the country." This plea was filed October 8, 1892. On October 20, 1892, the cause was continued by consent. On April 25, 1893, a judgment by default was rendered against the defendant in favor of Jones Bros., with writ of inquiry. The defendant having interposed her plea, it was manifestly...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Skelton v. Weaver
...the court commits error to reversal if it renders a judgment by default or nil dicit. McCoy v. Harrell, 40 Ala. 232; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; Clements v. Mayfield Woolen Mills, 128 Ala. 332, 29 So. 10. 'But if defendant interposes only an affirmative defense by way of confe......
-
Lokey v. Ward
... ... reversal if it renders a judgment by default or nil dicit ... McCoy v. Harrell, 40 Ala. 232; Green v ... Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; Clements v ... Mayfield Woolen Mills, 128 Ala. 332, 29 So. 10 ... But if ... defendant ... ...
-
Linch v. Scott
...is error without injury. Glass & Co. v. Paulk, 83 Ala. 404, 3 So. 800; Elyton Land Co. v. Morgan, 88 Ala. 434, 7 So. 249; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; McCoy v. Harrell, 40 Ala. 232; Warehouse Co. v. Street, 137 Ala. 621, 34 So. 903. A judgment nil dicit will be sustained, altho......
-
Garnett v. Scott
...plaintiff's averred claims. Hall v. Nix, 156 Ala. 423, 47 So. 335; Langdon v. Williams, 22 Ala. 681; Grigg v. Gilmer, supra; Green v. Jones, 102 Ala. 303, 14 So. 630; Clements v. Mayfield Woolen Mills, 128 Ala. 332, So. 10; Barnard v. Irwin, 8 Ala. App. 544, 62 So. 963. A slight analogy is ......