Green v. State

Decision Date28 December 1891
Citation15 S.E. 10,88 Ga. 516
PartiesGreen v. State.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Criminal Law—Confessions.

A confession or criminating admission, made by a person in jail to the sheriff and another, the latter of whom had arrested him and brought him to prison on another charge, and who expected a reward in case of a conviction on the charge now in question, is not admissible in evidence where it was induced by a remark made to the prisoner by such third person, in the presence of the sheriff, in these terms: "Edmund, if you know anything, it may be best for you to tell it;" or, "Edmund, if you know anything, go and tell it, and it may be best for you." The evidence having been received before this inducement appeared, it having been brought out on cross-examination of the state's witness, a motion then made to withdraw and exclude it from the jury should have been granted.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from superior court, Fannin county; George F. Gober, Judge.

Prosecution against Edmund Green. Verdict of guilty, and judgment thereon. Defendant brings error. Reversed.

W. T. Day and M. J. Jerman, for plaintiff in error.

Geo. R. Brown, Sol. Gen., and W. A. Little, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Lumpkin, J. A careful and laborious examination of a large number of textbooks and decisions touching the admissibility of confessions in evidence in criminal cases shows that the authorities are in considerable conflict, and that it is difficult to draw a precise line between confessions which should be received and those which should be rejected. The tendency of modern judicial opinion is to refuse to admit them when there is any reasonable ground to believe that they were induced by hope or fear. Precisely what words or conduct will constitute such inducement is not easily determined, and differences of opinion concerning the effect and meaning of many expressions, varying in language, but more or less similar in import, have given rise to the conflict mentioned. We do not think it would be profitable now to review and discuss these authorities, either with the view of attempting to harmonize them, or of deducing from them a rule which could be applied to all cases. We shall content ourselves, in this case, with announcing our purpose to adhere closely to the plain mandates of our own statutes as expressed in sections 3792 and 3793 of the Code, and with putting the seal of our condemnation upon the practice too much indulged in by officers and quasi officers,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Crank
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 23 Octubre 1943
    ... ... ours. People v. Campos , 10 Cal.App.2d 310, ... 52 P.2d 251; People v. Crowley , 13 Cal.App ... 322, 109 P. 493. See also State v. Cano , 64 ... Utah 87, 228 P. 563; State v. Mewhinney , 43 ... Utah 135, 134 P. 632, L.R.A. 1916D, 590, Am. Cas. 1916C, 537; ... State v. Green , 78 Utah 580, 6 P.2d 177 ... [105 ... Utah 343] It is argued that the information should have been ... quashed because hearsay evidence was received and acted upon ... by the justice at the preliminary hearing. At that hearing, ... one Hawkins testified that he was present when ... ...
  • Garrett v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 14 Abril 1948
    ... ... court to hold, as a matter of law, that it was not made ... voluntarily, and to take it from the jury's ... consideration ...          In ... support of his contention, counsel for the plaintiff in ... error, cites and relies upon the cases of Green v ... State, 88 Ga. 516, 15 S.E. 10, 30 Am.St.Rep.; King ... v. State, 155 Ga. 707, 118 S.E. 368; Lee v ... State, 168 Ga. 554, 148 S.E. 400; McLemore v. State, ... supra; and Coker v. State, 199 Ga. 20, 33 S.E.2d ... 171. The trial court in each of these cases was reversed for ... ...
  • The State v. Condit
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Marzo 1925
    ... ... Constitution, art. 2, sec. 22; R. S. 1919, secs. 3200, 3681; ... State v. Young, 119 Mo. 520; State v ... Blackburn, 273 Mo. 482; State v. Thomas, 250 ... Mo. 211; Tucker v. Davis, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1083, ... note; Purpura v. United States, 262 F. 473; ... Green v. State, 88 Ga. 516. (3) The written ... statements given at the police station, having been ... involuntary and illegally obtained, subsequent oral ... statements following in their wake will be presumed to have ... been the product of the same influence, and should also have ... been ... ...
  • Bryant v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 15 Enero 1941
    ... ... cit.; Reid v. State, 49 Ga.App. 429, 176 S.E. 100, ... and cit.), and 'a witness may not be impeached by simply ... showing that he had made a statement not material to the ... issue,' such evidence was inadmissible to controvert the ... witness. Green v. State, 43 Ga. 368(2); Mitchum ... v. State, 11 Ga. 615(8); Clarke v. State, 41 ... Ga.App. 556, 153 S.E. 616; Poland v. Osborne Lumber ... Co., 37 Ga.App. 212, 139 S.E. 734 ...          3. The ... court did not err in excluding testimony of two witnesses, as ... to whether ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT