Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Greene v. Greene, 70--1197

Document Cited in 11 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date04 January 1972
Docket NumberNo. 70--1197,70--1197
Citation256 So.2d 258
PartiesJean Barbara GREENE, Appellant, v. Donald Leonard GREENE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Page 258

256 So.2d 258

Jean Barbara GREENE, Appellant, v. Donald Leonard GREENE, Appellee.

No. 70--1197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 4, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1972.

Mamber, Gopman, Epstein, Miles and Foosaner, North Miami Beach, and Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Miami, for appellant.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson & Stewart and Jon I. Gordon, Miami, for appellee.

Before SWANN, C.J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff wife from a judgment which granted her a divorce, seeking reversal with regard to the provisions therein relating to alimony and support. The cause was uncontested as to the ground of divorce. Lump sum alimony was awarded, payable in a certain amount at the time of the judgment and in installments over a period of years. The wife was awarded custody of two children of the parties, 10 and 13 years of age at the time of the judgment. Certain child support was allowed, and the wife was given permission to reside, with the children, in the residence previously occupied by the parties. The residence was owned one third by the husband, and two thirds by the children under a trust. It was provided that the privilege of occupancy thereof by the wife would end when the children attained majority, or sooner if the wife should remarry or remove therefrom. The judgment required the husband to pay the taxes and insurance on the residence premises, but imposed upon the wife the burden of its upkeep and repair, with permission to the husband to have repairs made to the premises and deduct the cost thereof from unmatured payments of alimony.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Poe v. Poe
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 20, 1972
    ...Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 40; Reed v. Reed, Fla.App.1971, 244 So.2d 449; Melton v. Melton, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 705; Greene v. Greene, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 258; but see: Pendleton v. Pendleton, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 499; Steinhau v. Steinhauer, Fla.App.1971, 252 So.2d 825. It is noted......
  • Price v. Price, s. 79-1158
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 21, 1980
    ...is not required. Elkins v. Elkins, 287 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Poe v. Poe, 263 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Cf. Greene v. Greene, 256 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (where alimony provisions would probably terminate at a time when the wife had no other We do find error, however, in the......
  • Hyatt v. Hyatt, 74--922
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 10, 1975
    ...from changes in circumstances of the parties, to have become necessary or reasonably required for her support. See Greene v. Greene, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 258 and Cf. Melin v. Melin, Fla.App.1972, 265 So.2d 414; Reback v. Reback, Fla.App.1974, 296 So.2d 541; Schwartz v. Schwartz, Fla.App.......
  • Weinman v. Weinman, 74--1069
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 8, 1975
    ...204 So.2d 734; Barfield v. Barfield, Fla.App.1969, 1969, 226 So.2d 132; Arthur v. Arthur, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 8; Greene v. Greene, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 258. The court did not abuse discretion in limiting the time of possession of the residence by the appellant, but we hold it was err......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT