Greenough v. Sch. Comm. of Pawtucket
| Citation | 62 A. 978,27 R.I. 427 |
| Parties | GREENOUGH, Atty. Gen., v. SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF PAWTUCKET. |
| Decision Date | 05 January 1906 |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Application by William B. Greenough, Attorney General, for writ of certiorari to the school committee of Pawtucket. Denied.
Argued before DOUGLAS, C. J., and DUBOIS, BLODGETT, JOHNSON, and PARKHURST, JJ.
Hugh J. Carroll, for petitioner. Barney & Lee, for respondents.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the school committee of Pawtucket in voting "to change certain of the text-books heretofore for a long time used in the public schools of said city," and "to purchase certain new text-books to take the place of those so as aforesaid heretofore used." We are of the opinion that certiorari does not lie in such a case. The selection of text-books by the school committee is an administrative or legislative duty, not in any sense a judicial one. While, like most administrative duties, it involves the use of judgment and discretion, it is not a judicial determination of rights or contested issues such as constitutes a judgment of court.
The exact question before us was decided in People v. Oakland Board of Education, 54 Cal. 375, where the court held that the action of the board in adopting a series of readers for the public schools in lieu of a series previously in use was an exercise of legislative, not of judicial, power, and could not be reviewed by certiorari. The court quote with approval the language of Mr. Justice Field in the Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U. S. 761, 25 L. Ed. 496, as follows: This, in our opinion, is a clear and just statement of the rule which applies to the case at bar, and the deductions of the California court are logical and convincing. The votes of the committee determined no contested rights, but directed future action on the principle of policy or expediency. This action was legislative, not judicial.
It is well settled that in this state the common-law limitations of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thayer Amusement Corp. v. Moulton
...in the absence of such questions being raised, we repeat what has been formerly said by this court in Greenough v. School Committee of Pawtucket, 27 R.I. 427 at page 428, 62 A. 978: "It is well settled that in this state the common-law limitations of certiorari prevail which confine it to t......
-
Diruzzo v. Spagnoli
...Code of Ordinances of Town of Narragansett, Rhode Island § 74-35(a); Godena, 88 R.I. at 126-27, 143 A.2d at 293 (citing Greenhough, 27 R.I. at 428, 62 A. at 978). Thus, fact that procedural due process requirements do not apply with equal force to legislative actions undermines Plaintiffs' ......
-
R. I. Home Builders Inc. v. Hunt
...in character. We are in accord with that law and this court has so held in Sisson v. Peloquin, R. I., 133 A. 621; Greenough v. School Committee, 27 R.I. 427, 62 A. 978; Donahue v. Town Council, 25 R.I. 79, 54 A. 933. The next question for consideration is whether under the act the petitione......
-
Phillips v. McLaughlin, 1072
...R.I. 502, 67 A.2d 369; R. I. Home Builders v. Hunt, 74 R.I. 255, 60 A.2d 496; Sisson v. Peloquin, R.I., 133 A. 621; Greenough v. School Committee, 27 R.I. 427, 62 A. 978; Donahue v. Town Council, 25 R.I. 79, 54 A. 933. Unless otherwise provided by statute the power delegated to boards and c......