Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co.
Decision Date | 23 December 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 11661-11664,11668-11670.,11661-11664 |
Citation | 114 F.2d 53 |
Parties | GREENSFELDER et al. v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Bernard Greensfelder, Forrest M. Hemker, George T. Priest, Robert E. Moloney, Thomas S. McPheeters, Robert H. McRoberts, W. Frank Carter, Harold R. Small, Samuel W. Fordyce, Joseph R. Long, Greensfelder & Hemker, Boyle & Priest, Bryan, Williams, Cave & McPheeters, Carter & Small, and Fordyce, White, Mayne, Williams & Hartman, all of St. Louis, Mo., on general brief of appellants.
Robert H. McRoberts, of St. Louis, Mo., presented general argument for appellants.
Forrest M. Hemker, of St. Louis, Mo., (Bernard Greensfelder and Greensfelder & Hemker, all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant Edward Greensfelder.
George T. Priest, of St. Louis, Mo. (Boyle & Priest, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant Robert E. Moloney.
Robert H. McRoberts, of St. Louis, Mo. (Thomas S. McPheeters and Bryan, Williams, Cave & McPheeters, all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant Rhodes E. Cave.
Robert B. Caldwell, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant Samuel A. Mitchell.
Harold R. Small, of St. Louis, Mo. (W. Frank Carter, William T. Jones, and Emmet T. Carter, all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellants W. Frank Carter and others.
Hyman G. Stein, of St. Louis, Mo., pro se.
S. W. Fordyce, of St. Louis, Mo. (G. T. Priest, Frank E. Williams, Joseph R. Long, Boyle & Priest, and Fordyce, White, Mayne, Williams & Hartman, all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant Frank O. Watts.
T. E. Francis, of St. Louis, Mo. (O. P. Owen, B. G. Carpenter, and T. E. Francis, Jr., all of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellees St. Louis Public Service Co. and Henry W. Kiel, Trustee, St. Louis Public Service Company, debtor.
Edgar H. Wayman and Harold C. Hanke, both of St. Louis Mo., on the general brief for appellee City of St. Louis.
Before WOODROUGH and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and BELL, District Judge.
Writ of Certiorari Denied December 23, 1940. See 61 S.Ct. 396, 85 L.Ed. ___.
Edward Greensfelder, and other attorneys and individuals who filed claims for compensation for services rendered in the reorganization in bankruptcy of the St. Louis Public Service Company, appeal from the final decree rendered on the claims. Appeals have been taken severally but they present some issues of law which are common to several appeals and which have been presented in one brief for appellants and an answer brief for appellees. We consider them first.
The St. Louis Public Service Company is a utility corporation engaged in the business of furnishing transportation facilities in and about the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Its assets used and useful in this service were valued at $66,000,000 in January, 1927, by the Missouri Public Service Commission; its other assets not so used or useful were then valued at $1,200,000. The Company went into federal court receivership on April 15, 1933, at which time the book value of its property and assets was $73,000,000. The Company serves an area of some 110 square miles and a population of some 1,000,000 persons. At the time of the receivership it owned about 1,330 street cars, 176 trailers and 212 work cars, and operated over about 457.19 miles of tracks. In addition, it operated 93 motor buses and was under contract to purchase corporate stock which would give it control of other buses and bus lines and a monopoly of transportation by street car and bus in St. Louis. The capitalization, funded and other indebtedness of the Company on April 15, 1933, is given in the following table:
The Public Service Company acquired its properties in 1927, when mortgages on the predecessor company, United Railways Company of St. Louis, were foreclosed. This foreclosure left outstanding certain first mortgage bonds, United Railways 4's, which had been formerly issued from time to time under an indenture executed in 1899 to the St. Louis Union Trust Company as trustee. The Reorganization Plan of 1927 contemplated issuance of a Supplemental Indenture extending this first lien to 84% of the property to be acquired through reorganization. Other street railway property was acquired at that time from another company, the City and Suburban Public Service Company, and taken subject to the liens upon it, particularly the mortgage securing the Suburban 5's, an issue of that company which was preserved by issue of a Supplemental Indenture preserving and assuming existing obligations. Some 96 miles of single track street railway lines, 57 miles of which were in St. Louis County, the balance in the City of St. Louis, and certain franchises, were covered by this indenture. Interest on the Suburban 5's had been paid up to the date of the commencement of the receivership. Interest on the United Railways 4's had likewise been paid up to the date of the receivership, and these bonds also matured on July 1, 1934.
At the time of the reorganization in 1927 Convertible Gold Notes were issued in the amount of $2,448,875; these obligations were unsecured and were originally due January 1, 1933. All but some $35,000 of the notes had been extended to July 1, 1934, and the interest had been paid thereon to January 1, 1933. There were also outstanding at the time of the receivership certain real estate notes secured by mortgage on property not used or useful in the operation of street railway business. These notes, obligations of the Florissant Construction, Real Estate and Investment Company, called the Florissant notes, were paid off from time to time and eventually retired.
A $10,000,000 bank loan was outstanding at the time of the receivership, and this also was made in furtherance of the 1927 reorganization. Bank loans were then outstanding in the amount of $4,100,000 secured by $6,000,000 principal amount of United Railways 4's. This loan and adjusted interest thereon was paid off in the $10,000,000 bank loan transaction, and $5,400,000 of the loan was used by the reorganized company to take up $9,000,000 principal amount of United Railways 4% bonds from holders who were willing to accept an offer to take $600 cash and $275 Convertible Gold Notes for each $1,000 bond. The balance of some $400,000 was paid in cash to the reorganized company. At the time of the 1927 reorganization there was a plan to refund the $10,000,000 loan by issuing securities which would not only take up this loan but also provide for the obligations falling due in 1933 and 1934. But due to delay in confirmation of a petition to secure an advance in fares, and due to the depression of October, 1929, no new issues were floated, and the $10,000,000 loan was renewed from year to year. The banks did not secure possession of the $9,000,000 bonds repurchased, but they were given an additional $1,626,000 of United Railways 4's as additional collateral for the loan when market value of the 4's fell from 85¢ to 15¢ on the dollar. The Mercantile-Commerce Bank and Trust Company desired its share of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cooke v. Bowersock
...duty to vacate or modify any such order which it finds to be contrary to law or unsupported by the evidence. Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 8 Cir., 114 F.2d 53; Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Herring, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 320; In re Porto Rican Tobacco Co., 2 Cir., 117 F.2d 599;......
-
In re Hydrocarbon Chemicals, Inc.
...Prudence Co., 2d Cir. 1938, 96 F.2d 157; Vermilion Bay Land Co. v. Fitzgerald, 6th Cir. 1946, 157 F.2d 640; Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 8th Cir. 1940, 114 F.2d 53, cert. denied sub nom. Stein v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 311 U.S. 714, 61 S.Ct. 396, 85 L.Ed. 464; In re ......
-
In re 32-36 North State St. Bldg. Corporation
...discretion of the court. This is in line with various decisions. In re A. Herz, Inc., 7 Cir., 81 F. 2d 511; Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 8 Cir., 114 F.2d 53; Teasdale v. Sefton National Fibre Can Co., 8 Cir., 85 F.2d 379, 107 A.L.R. 531; London v. Snyder, 8 Cir., 163 F.2d 6......
-
London v. Snyder
...v. Scullin Steel Co., 8 Cir., 98 F.2d 503, 505; Stark v. Woods Bros. Corp., 8 Cir., 109 F.2d 969, 972; Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 8 Cir., 114 F.2d 53, 60, 62; Cooke v. Bowersock, 8 Cir., 122 F.2d 977; Stein v. Hemker, 8 Cir., 157 F.2d 740; Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Johnston, 10......
-
Fee-Shifting in Bankruptcy.
...trustee and his counsel, the complexity of the issues, and the commendable results achieved); Greensfelder v. St. Louis Public Serv. Co., 114 F.2d 53, 61 (8th Cir. 1940); Milbank, Tweed & Hope v. McCue, 111 F.2d 100, 101 (4th Cir. 1940); In re Mt. Forest Fur Farms of Am., 157 F-2d 640, ......