Griffin v. CitiMortgage Inc., NO. 2019-CP-00304-COA

CourtCourt of Appeals of Mississippi
Writing for the CourtJ. WILSON, P.J., FOR THE COURT
Citation296 So.3d 767
Decision Date12 May 2020
Docket NumberNO. 2019-CP-00304-COA
Parties Annie Y. GRIFFIN and Frederick Griffin, Appellants v. CITIMORTGAGE INC., as Successor in Interest to ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc., Jauregui & Lindsey LLC, as Trustee, and ABC Companies, Appellees

296 So.3d 767

Annie Y. GRIFFIN and Frederick Griffin, Appellants
v.
CITIMORTGAGE INC., as Successor in Interest to ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc., Jauregui & Lindsey LLC, as Trustee, and ABC Companies, Appellees

NO. 2019-CP-00304-COA

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

May 12, 2020


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ANNIE Y. GRIFFIN (PRO SE) FREDERICK GRIFFIN (PRO SE)

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: RICHARD CARLTON KELLER, JASON BRYON TINGLE, BRADLEY BARRON VANCE, Jackson

BEFORE J. WILSON, P.J., WESTBROOKS AND McDONALD, JJ.

J. WILSON, P.J., FOR THE COURT:

296 So.3d 769

¶1. This is the third lawsuit that Annie and Frederick Griffin have filed in an effort to prevent foreclosure on their home. Their first two lawsuits were dismissed with prejudice, and the dismissals were affirmed on appeal. In their third lawsuit, the Griffins allege that CitiMortgage Inc., the beneficiary of their deed of trust, and Jauregui & Lindsey LLC, the substitute trustee, breached the deed of trust and committed torts or violated other laws by noticing a foreclosure sale while the Griffins were attempting to settle an unrelated dispute with their homeowners’ association. The chancery court dismissed the Griffins’ amended complaint with prejudice, holding that it failed to state any claim upon which relief could be granted and was also barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We agree with the chancery court that the Griffins’ amended complaint failed to state a claim.1 Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the chancery court dismissing the case with prejudice.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2. In 2001, the Griffins obtained a mortgage loan from CitiMortgage and granted CitiMortgage a deed of trust on their home.2 In September 2006, the Griffins requested a loan modification, which CitiMortgage granted. After the loan modification agreement was signed, CitiMortgage discovered a mistake in the document and asked the Griffins to initial a corrected version of the document. The Griffins refused and then stopped making mortgage payments. In response, CitiMortgage hired an attorney to begin foreclosure proceedings pursuant to the deed of trust.

I. Griffin I

¶3. In November 2007, the Griffins filed suit in the DeSoto County Chancery Court against CitiMortgage and the trustee under the deed of trust. The Griffins alleged breach of contract and fraud in connection with their loan modification. The defendants removed the case to federal court. In 2012, the federal district court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal on appeal, and the United States Supreme Court denied the Griffins’ request for a stay and petition for a writ of certiorari. Griffin v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. , 517 F. App'x 240 (5th Cir. 2013), stay denied , 570 U.S. 935, 134 S.Ct. 23 (2013), cert. denied , 571 U.S. 1094, 134 S.Ct. 789, 187 L.Ed.2d 594 (2013).

II. Griffin II

¶4. In January 2014, the Griffins filed a new complaint against CitiMortgage and the trustee in the DeSoto County Chancery Court. The Griffins’ new complaint made the same factual allegations and asserted the same basic claims against the same defendants as their complaint in Griffin I. The chancery court dismissed the complaint based on the doctrine of res judicata, this Court affirmed on appeal, and the Mississippi Supreme Court denied the Griffins’ petition for writ of certiorari.

296 So.3d 770

Griffin v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. , 232 So. 3d 189 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017), cert. denied , 229 So. 3d 713 (Miss. 2017).

III. Griffin III

¶5. In April 2018, CitiMortgage appointed a substitute trustee under the deed of trust (Jauregui & Lindsey), who then published notice that a foreclosure sale would be held pursuant to the deed of trust. Eight days before the scheduled foreclosure sale, the Griffins filed a new complaint in the DeSoto County Chancery Court against CitiMortgage and Jauregui & Lindsey. The foreclosure sale was then cancelled.

¶6. The defendants removed the case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. But just before the case was removed and before any responsive pleading was filed, the Griffins filed an amended complaint that named their homeowners’ association, Grandview Lakes Homeowners’ Association Inc., as an additional defendant. The federal district court remanded the case to the chancery court because it concluded that Grandview's presence in the case defeated diversity jurisdiction. Griffin v. CitiMortgage Inc. , No. 3:18-CV-00146-NBB-JMV, 2018 WL 4261074, at *3 (N.D. Miss. Sept. 5, 2018).

¶7. The Griffins’ amended complaint begins with a series of allegations about separate litigation between them and Grandview. That case, which was filed in 2006 and was also pending in the DeSoto County Chancery Court, apparently started as an action to collect unpaid homeowners’ assessments, but it also involves claims by the Griffins and other homeowners that Grandview improperly amended their subdivision's restrictive covenants. That case was scheduled for mediation on June 13, 2018. The Griffins allege that the trustee's publication of a notice of a foreclosure sale interfered with their ability to settle their dispute with Grandview. They also claim that CitiMortgage breached the deed of trust, violated unspecified "laws," and caused them emotional distress by pursuing foreclosure prior to the scheduled mediation and by communicating with Grandview.

¶8. CitiMortgage filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and based on the doctrine of res judicata. Jauregui & Lindsey joined CitiMortgage's motion, and Grandview filed an answer to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Spiers v. Oak Grove Credit, LLC, 2020-CA-00827-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • November 18, 2021
    ...still render the claim futile, the chancellor is well within [her] discretion to deny such request.’ " Griffin v. CitiMortgage, Inc. , 296 So. 3d 767, 772 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (alteration in original) (quoting Littlefield v. Littlefield , 282 So. 3d 820, 829-30 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019) (citin......
  • Spiers v. Oak Grove Credit, LLC, 2020-CA-00827-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • November 18, 2021
    ...still render the claim futile, the chancellor is well within [her] discretion to deny such request.'" Griffin v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 296 So.3d 767, 772 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (alteration in original) (quoting Littlefield v. Littlefield, 282 So.3d 820, 829-30 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019) (citing Har......
  • Monk v. Fountain, NO. 2017-CA-01679-COA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • May 12, 2020
    ...that the chancellor should have granted her visitation under the doctrine of in loco parentis. However, Monk did not make this argument 296 So.3d 767 in the trial court, so the issue is waived. Moreover, the evidence did not show that Monk was "in loco parentis" to K.F.5 Rather, the evidenc......
3 cases
  • Spiers v. Oak Grove Credit, LLC, 2020-CA-00827-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • November 18, 2021
    ...render the claim futile, the chancellor is well within [her] discretion to deny such request.’ " Griffin v. CitiMortgage, Inc. , 296 So. 3d 767, 772 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (alteration in original) (quoting Littlefield v. Littlefield , 282 So. 3d 820, 829-30 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019) (citing......
  • Spiers v. Oak Grove Credit, LLC, 2020-CA-00827-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • November 18, 2021
    ...still render the claim futile, the chancellor is well within [her] discretion to deny such request.'" Griffin v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 296 So.3d 767, 772 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (alteration in original) (quoting Littlefield v. Littlefield, 282 So.3d 820, 829-30 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019) (citin......
  • Monk v. Fountain, NO. 2017-CA-01679-COA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • May 12, 2020
    ...that the chancellor should have granted her visitation under the doctrine of in loco parentis. However, Monk did not make this argument 296 So.3d 767 in the trial court, so the issue is waived. Moreover, the evidence did not show that Monk was "in loco parentis" to K.F.5 Rather, t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT