Griggs v. Houston

Decision Date01 October 1881
CitationGriggs v. Houston, 104 U.S. 553, 26 L.Ed. 840 (1881)
PartiesGRIGGS v. HOUSTON
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee.

The defendants, contractors engaged in building a railroad in Tennessee, were sued by the widow of Griggs, for herself and his minor children, for damages caused by his death. He was improperly riding on the pilot or bumper of a locomotive, forming part of a construction train of the defendants, at the time it collided with loaded cars standing on the track. The injuries he then received resulted in his death. Persons on the cars attached to the train were not hurt.

Her claim to recover was based upon sect. 1166 and sect. 1167 of the Code of Tennessee, prescribing certain precautions which a railroad company must observe in running its train. They provide that 'when any person, animal, or other obstruction appears upon the road, the alarm-whistle shall be sounded, the breaks put down, and every possible means employed to stop the train and prevent an accident; and every railroad company that fails to observe these precautions, or cause them to be observed by its agents or servants, shall be responsible for all damage to persons or property occasioned by or resulting from any accident or collision that may occur.' The court charged the jury that these provisions did not apply to the case, and that she was not entitled to recover. The jury found for the defendants, and she sued out this writ.

Submitted on printed...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
54 cases
  • Ketterman v. Dry Fork R. Co
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1900
    ...the defendant, "— citing Herbert v. Butler, 97 U. S. 319, 24 L. Ed. 958; Bowditch v. Boston, 101 U. S. 16. 25 L. Ed. 980: Griggs v. Huston, 104 U. S. 553, 26 L. Ed. 840; Randall v. Railroad Co., 109 U. S. 478, 3 Sup. Ct. 322, 27 L. Ed. 1003; Commissioners v. Beal, 113 U. S. 227, 5 Sup. Ct. ......
  • Severtson v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1915
    ...27 L. J. C. P. N. S. 39, 6 Week. Rep. 44; Hyatt v. Johnson, 91 Pa. 200; Pleasants v. Fant, 22 Wall. 120, 22 L. ed. 782; Griggs v. Houston, 104 U.S. 553, 26 L. ed. 840; Marion County v. Clark, 94 U.S. 284, 24 L. ed. Bagley v. Bowe, 105 N.Y. 179, 59 Am. Rep. 488, 11 N.E. 386; Bulger v. Rosa, ......
  • Dernberger v. Baltimore & O.R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 31, 1916
    ... ... verdict returned in opposition to it. Phoenix Ins. Co ... v. Doster, 106 U.S. 30, 32 (1 Sup.Ct. 18, 27 L.Ed ... 65); Griggs v. Houston, 104 U.S. 553 (26 L.Ed ... 840); Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 109 ... U.S. 478, 482 (3 Sup.Ct. 322, 27 L.Ed. 1003); ... ...
  • Baltimore Co v. Groeger
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1925
    ...22 L. Ed. 780; Herbert v. Butler, 97 U. S. 319, 320, 24 L. Ed. 958; Bowditch v. Boston, 101 U. S. 16, 18, 25 L. Ed. 980; Griggs v. Houston, 104 U. S. 553, 26 L. Ed. 840; Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Doster, 106 U. S. 30, 32, 1 S. Ct. 18, 27 L. Ed. 65; Russell v. Allen, 107 U. S. 163, 2 S. Ct. 327, 2......
  • Get Started for Free