Grimes v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue , Docket No. 744–83.
| Citation | 82 T.C. 235,82 T.C. No. 22 |
| Decision Date | 06 February 1984 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. 744–83. |
| Parties | JOHN A. GRIMES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent |
| Court | United States Tax Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Petitioner filed a petition in this Court claiming that his wages are not taxable income. He had previously filed a similar petition and was informed by this Court that his contentions were without merit. Held, respondent's determination of deficiencies and additions to tax under secs. 6651(a), 6653(a), and 6654(a), I.R.C. 1954, are sustained. Held further, damages under sec. 6673, I.R.C. 1954, are awarded to the United States because petitioner instituted these proceedings primarily for delay and his position is frivolous. John A. Grimes, pro se.
John B. Franklin, for the respondent.
Respondent determined deficiencies in and additions to petitioner's Federal income tax as follows:
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦ ¦Sec. 6651(a) ¦Sec. 6653(a) ¦Sec. 6654(a) ¦
+------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------¦
¦ ¦ ¦1 addition ¦addition to ¦addition to ¦
+------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------¦
¦Year ¦Deficiency ¦to tax ¦tax ¦tax ¦
+------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------¦
¦1977 ¦$7,102.00 ¦$1,775.50 ¦$355.10 ¦$227.26 ¦
+------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------¦
¦1979 ¦6,969.12 ¦1,742.28 ¦348.46 ¦292.70 ¦
+------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------¦
¦1980 ¦4,949.48 ¦1,237.37 ¦247.47 ¦316.76 ¦
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
The issues are (1) whether wages received by petitioner constitute gross income under section 61(a),2 (2) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax under section 6651(a), (3) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax under section 6653(a), (4) whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax under section 6654(a), and (5) whether the statute of limitations bars the assessment of the deficiency and addition to tax for 1977.
The facts have been fully stipulated and are so found.
Petitioner, John A. Grimes, resided in El Cajon, Calif., when the petition was filed herein.
During the years in issue, petitioner worked for the following electric companies from whom he received wages as shown:
+------------------------------------------------+
¦ ¦1977 ¦1979 ¦1980 ¦
+------------------------+-------+-------+-------¦
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
+------------------------+-------+-------+-------¦
¦El Cajon Electric Co. ¦$21,450¦$28,597¦$19,730¦
+------------------------+-------+-------+-------¦
¦Owl Electric, Inc. ¦370 ¦--- ¦--- ¦
+------------------------+-------+-------+-------¦
¦Southland Electric, Inc.¦--- ¦--- ¦3,504 ¦
+------------------------+-------+-------+-------¦
¦Total wages ¦21,820 ¦28,597 ¦23,234 ¦
+------------------------------------------------+
He also received interest totaling $18 and $11 in 1977 and 1979, respectively, and dividends totaling $38 in 1980. Petitioner did not have any Federal income tax withheld from his wages nor did he pay any estimated tax during the years in issue.
Petitioner did not file a return for any of the years in issue. In his notices of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner had taxable income of $27,430, $27,608, and $22,272 for 1977, 1979, and 1980, respectively. Respondent also asserted additions to tax under sections 6651(a), 6653(a), and 6654(a).
The first issue is whether wages received by petitioner constitute gross income under section 61(a). Petitioner bears the burden of proving that respondent's determinations with respect to his wages are erroneous. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933). Petitioner has failed to provide any evidence to disprove respondent's determinations. He simply presented this Court with frivolous contentions that merit no discussion. See Rowlee v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111 (1983), on appeal (2d Cir., Sept. 13, 1983); Hallock v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983–684. Thus, we sustain respondent's deficiency determinations that petitioner's wages constitute gross income under section 61(a).
The next two issues are whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax for failure to file timely income tax returns and for negligence under sections 6651(a) and 6653(a), respectively. Petitioner also bears the burden of proof on these issues. Rule 142(a); Fischer v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 164 (1968); Enoch v. Commissioner, 57 T.C. 781 (1972). Since petitioner did not present any evidence with respect to these issues, we sustain the additions to tax under sections 6651(a) and 6653(a).
The fourth issue is whether petitioner is liable for additions to tax under section 6654(a) for failure to pay estimated tax. When there has been a failure to pay or an underpayment of estimated tax, this particular addition is mandatory and no inquiry is made as to possible reasonable cause or lack of willful neglect. Bagur v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 817, 824 (1976). Since petitioner failed to pay any estimated tax and no taxes were withheld from his wages during the years in issue, we sustain the additions to tax under section 6654(a).
The fifth issue is whether the statute of limitations bars the assessment of the deficiency and addition to tax for 1977. Since petitioner did not file a return for 1977, the statute of limitations had not expired when respondent sent to petitioner a notice of deficiency for 1977. Sec. 6501(c)(3). Thus, respondent is not barred from assessing the deficiency and addition to tax for 1977.
Finally, we must determine whether damages should be awarded to the United States under section 6673.3 For cases commenced in this Court before January 1, 1983, section 6673 allowed this Court to award the United States up to $500 in damages whenever it appeared to the Court that the proceedings before it had been “instituted by the taxpayer merely for delay.” On several occasions, we took the opportunity to warn taxpayers that if they continued to bring frivolous cases serious consideration would be given to imposing damages under section 6673. See Hatfield v. Commissioner, 68 T.C. 895, 899–900 (1977).4 When taxpayers continued to present frivolous arguments, we began awarding damages under section 6673 thus making it clear that the time to act had arrived. See Greenberg v. Commissioner, 73 T,C. 806, 813–816 (1980); Wilkinson v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 633, 639–643 (1979). Nevertheless, this Court continued to be inundated with an ever increasing number of “tax protester” cases.
In an effort to strengthen this Court's ability to “stem the tide” of frivolous cases, Congress recently amended section 6673 to allow this Court to award damages of up to $5,000 in cases commenced after December 31, 1982. Sec. 292(b), Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, Pub. L. 97–248, 96 Stat. 574. The section, as amended,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
May v. C.I.R.
...the warnings and the imposition of section 6673 damages, the number of tax protest petitions continued to increase, see Grimes v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 235, 238 (1984), and the Tax Court issued further warnings that it would begin to dispose of these cases summarily. McCoy v. Commissioner, ......
-
Hendrickson v. Commissioner, Docket No. 8115-84.
...Coulter v. Commissioner Dec. 41,115, 82 T. C. 580 (1984); Abrams v. Commissioner Dec. 41,031, 82 T. C. 403 (1984); Grimes v. Commissioner Dec. 40,979, 82 T. C. 235 (1984). To reflect the An appropriate order and decision will be entered. 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references ......
-
Caton v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...1509, 1510 (11th Cir. 1986) (describing the taxpayer's argument that his wages were not income as "patently frivolous"); Grimes v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 235, 237 (1984); Reiff v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1169, 1173 (1981). Consequently, we uphold respondent'sdeterminations of deficiencies in p......
-
Grimes v. C.I.R.
...not income or that they are not subject to taxation. Grimes has made, and lost, those arguments on two previous occasions. Grimes v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 235 (1984); John A. Grimes, 48 T.C.M. (P-H) p 79,514 (1980).2 26 U.S.C. Sec. 6673 provides: "Whenever it appears to the Tax Court that p......
-
Tax Court In Brief | Ashford V. Comm'r | Unreported Income, Additions To Tax, Frivolous Arguments, Taxable Income
...Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955); McNair v. Eggers, 788 F.2d 1509, 1510 (11th Cir. 1986) (per curiam); Grimes v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 235, 237 (1984); Reiff v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1169, 1173 n.7 Stipulations with the IRS. Per Rule 91(e), "A stipulation shall be treated, to th......