Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.

Decision Date26 August 2020
Docket NumberNo. 19-1952,19-1952
CitationGrimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020)
Parties Gavin GRIMM, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant – Appellant. NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.; interACT: Advocates for Intersex Youth; Fairfax County School Board; Alexandria City School Board ; Arlington School Board; Falls Church City School Board ; Trevor Project ; National Parent Teacher Association; GLSEN; American School Counselor Association ; National Association of School Psychologists; PFLAG, Inc. ; Trans Youth Equality Foundation ; Gender Spectrum; Gender Diversity ; Campaign for Southern Equality; He She Ze and We; Side by Side; Gender Benders; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry ; American Academy of Physician Assistants; American College of Physicians; American Medical Association; American Medical Students Association; American Medical Women's Association; American Nurses Association; American Psychiatric Association; American Public Health Association; Association of Medical School Pediatric Department Chairs ; GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBT Equality; LBGT PA Caucus; Pediatric Endocrine Society ; Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine; Society for Physician Assistants in Pediatrics ; World Professional Association for Transgender Health; Leah Fregulia; Adelita Grijalva; David Vannasdall, Ed.d.; Los Angeles Unified School District; Judy Chiasson, Ph. D.; Monica Garcia; Wendy Ranck-Buhr, Ph. D.; San Diego Unified School District; Eldridge Greer, Ph. D.; Gregory R. Meece; Franklin Newton, Ed.d.; Diana K. Bruce; Daniel F. Gohl; Denise Palazzo; Jeremy Majeski; Karen Carney; Sarah Shirk; Beth Bazer, Ed.d.; Paula Insley Miller, Ed.d.; Thomas Weber ; Thomas A. Aberli, Ed.d.; Howard Colter; Matthew Haney ; Ken Kunin; Robert A. Motley; Catherine From; Roger Bourgeois ; Cyndy Taymore; Lizbeth DeSelm; Dylan Pauly; DeLois Cooke Spryszak; Craig McCalla; Mary Doran; Washoe County School District; James C. Morse, Sr., Ed.d.; The School District of South Orange and Maplewood ; Thomas Smith, Ed.d.; Craig Vaughn ; Arthur DiBenedetto; Las Cruces Public Schools; Wendi Miller-Tomlinson, M.d., Ph.d.; John O'Reilly ; Heidi Carter; Anthony Gatto ; Eric Doss ; Peyton Chapman ; Ziad W. Munson, Ph. D.; Rachel Santa, Ed.d.; Kellie M. Hargis, Ed.d.; Lindsey Pollock, Ed.d.; Brian Schaffer ; The Washington Central Unified Union School District; Will Baker; Lisa Love; Sherie Hohs; Sherri Cyra; Laura H. Love, Ed.d.; Jill Gurtner; Monica Schommer; Bryan Davis, Ph. D.; Paru Shah, Ph. D.; Tim Kenney ; State of New York; State of Washington; State of California; State of Colorado; State of Connecticut; State of Delaware; State of Hawaii; State of Illinois; State of Maine; State of Maryland; State of Massachusetts; State of Michigan; State of Minnesota; State of Nevada; State of New Jersey; State of New Mexico; State of North Carolina; State of Oregon; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; State of Rhode Island; State of Vermont; Commonwealth of Virginia; District of Columbia, Amici Supporting Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

ARGUED: David Patrick Corrigan, HARMAN CLAYTON CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Joshua A. Block, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Jeremy D. Capps, M. Scott Fisher, Jr., George A. Somerville, HARMAN CLAYTOR CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Eden B. Heilman, Jennifer Safstrom, Nicole Tortoriello, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION, INC., Richmond, Virginia; Leslie Cooper, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York, for Appellee. Sherrilyn A. Ifill, President and Director-Counsel, Janai S. Nelson, Samual Spital, Jin Hee Lee, Kevin E. Jason, New York, New York, Christopher Kemmitt, NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., Washington, D.C.; Suzanne B. Goldberg, COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL SEXUALITY AND GENDER LAW CLINIC, New York, New York, for Amicus NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. Aron Fischer, Jonah M. Knobler, PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP, New York, New York, for Amicus interACT: Advocates for Intersex Youth. Stuart A. Raphael, Sona Rewari, Washington, D.C., Trevor S. Cox, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Amici Fairfax County School Board and Other Virginia School Boards. Howard S. Hogan, Washington, D.C., Abbey Hudson, Corey G. Singer, Keshia Afia Bonner, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Amicus The Trevor Project. Wesley R. Powell, Mary Eaton, WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP, New York, New York, for Amici The National PTA, GLSEN, American School Counselor Association, and National Association of School Psychologists. Asaf Orr, Shannon Minter, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, San Francisco, California; Lynly Egyes, TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER, Oakland, California; Maureen P. Alger, John C. Dwyer, Palo Alto, California, Kyle Wong, Audrey J. Mott-Smith, COOLEY LLP, San Francisco, California, for Amici PFLAG, Inc, Trans Youth Equality Foundation, Gender Spectrum, Gender Diversity, Campaign for Southern Equality, He She Ze and We, Side by Side, and Gender Benders. Aaron M. Panner, KELLOGG, HANSEN, TODD, FIGEL & FREDERICK, PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Devi M. Rao, Washington, D.C., Ethan C. Wong, JENNER & BLOCK LLP, New York, New York, for Amici Medical, Public Health, and Mental Health Organizations. Richard M. Segal, San Diego, California, Cynthia Cook Robertson, Robert C.K. Boyd, William C. Miller, PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP, Washington, D.C.; Tara L. Borelli, LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC., Atlanta, Georgia, for Amici School Administrators from Twenty-Nine States and the District of Columbia. Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General, Noah G. Purcell, Solicitor General, Alan D. Copsey, Deputy Solicitor General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, Olympia, Washington, for Amicus State of Washington. Letitia James, Attorney General, Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Anisha S. Dasgupta, Deputy Solicitor General, Linda Fang, Assistant Solicitor General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, New York, New York, for Amicus State of New York. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Sacramento, California, for Amicus State of California. Phil Weiser, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COLORADO, Denver, Colorado, for Amicus State of California. William Tong, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CONNECTICUT, Hartford, Connecticut, for Amicus State of Connecticut. Kathy Jennings, Attorney General, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Wilmington, Delaware, for Amicus State of Delaware. Clare E. Connors, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF HAWAII, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Amicus State of Hawaii. Kwame Raoul, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ILLINOIS, Chicago, Illinois, for Amicus State of Illinois. Aaron M. Frey, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MAINE, Augusta, Maine, for Amicus State of Maine. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Amicus State of Maryland. Maura Healey, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS, Boston, Massachusetts, for Amicus Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Dana Nessel, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Amicus State of Michigan. Keith Ellison, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MINNESOTA, St. Paul, Minnesota, for Amicus State of Minnesota. Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEVADA, Carson City, Nevada, for Amicus State of Nevada. Gubrir S. Grewal, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, Trenton, New Jersey, for Amicus State of New Jersey. Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, Santa Fe, New Mexico, for Amicus State of New Mexico. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Amicus State of North Carolina. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OREGON, Salem, Oregon, for Amicus State of Oregon. Josh Shapiro, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, for Amicus Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Peter F. Neronha, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF RHODE ISLAND, Providence, Rhode Island, for Amicus State of Rhode Island. Thomas J. Donovan, Jr., Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VERMONT, Montpelier, Vermont, for Amicus State of Vermont. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Amicus Commonwealth of Virginia. Karl A. Racine, Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Washington, D.C., for Amicus District of Columbia.

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Floyd wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge Wynn joined. Judge Wynn wrote a concurring opinion. Judge Niemeyer wrote a dissenting opinion.

FLOYD, Circuit Judge:

At the heart of this appeal is whether equal protection and Title IX can protect transgender students from school bathroom policies that prohibit them from affirming their gender. We join a growing consensus of courts in holding that the answer is resoundingly yes.

Now a twenty-year-old college student, Plaintiff-Appellee Gavin Grimm has spent the past five years litigating against the Gloucester County School Board's refusal to allow him as a transgender male to use the boys restrooms at Gloucester County High School. Grimm's birth-assigned sex, or so-called "biological sex," is female, but his gender identity is male. Beginning at the end of his freshman year, Grimm changed his first name to Gavin...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
121 cases
  • Hammons v. Univ. of Md. Med. Sys. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • July 28, 2021
    ...a claim under Title IX, a plaintiff must also allege that he was harmed by a defendant's improper conduct. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 972 F.3d 586, 616 (4th Cir. 2020). Here, Mr. Hammons alleges that Defendants are responsible for a health program or activity that receives federal ......
  • In re K.L.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 2021
    ...granting the Department that authority over K.L.BACKGROUND AND TERMINOLOGY RELEVANT TO TRANSGENDER STATUSIn Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board , 972 F. 3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020), rehearing en banc denied , 976 F. 3d 399 (2020), cert. denied , ––– U.S.––––, 141 S.Ct. 2878, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––......
  • Hinton v. Dist. of Columbia
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • September 30, 2021
    ...parties have a concrete interest, however small, in the outcome of the litigation, the case is not moot.’ " Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586, 604 (4th Cir. 2020) (quoting Chafin v. Chafin, 568 U.S. 165, 172, 133 S.Ct. 1017, 185 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013) ), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––......
  • Williams v. Kincaid
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • August 16, 2022
    ...of "gender identity disorder ... indicat[ed] that the clinical problem was the discordant gender identity." Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 972 F.3d 586, 611 (4th Cir. 2020) (internal citation omitted), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 2878, 210 L.Ed.2d 977 (2021). In other wor......
  • Get Started for Free
32 books & journal articles
  • FAIRNESS FOR ALL? THE IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING A THIRDGENDER CATEGORY IN ELITE SPORTS.
    • United States
    • November 1, 2023
    ...an equal protection challenge to franchising requirements under an FCC order. See 508 U.S. 307 (1993). (84.) Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586, 607-08 (4th Cir. 2020) (emphasis in original) (footnote omitted) (citation omitted) (quoting United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515......
  • Transgender Rights and Issues
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXII-2, January 2021
    • January 1, 2021
    ...accommodations laws.474 468. See Adams v. Sch. Bd. of St. Johns Cty., 968 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2020); Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586, 607 (4th Cir. 2020); Whitaker v. Kenosha Unif‌ied Sch. Dist. No. 1 Bd. of Educ., 858 F.3d 1034 (7th Cir. 2017); A.H. v. Minersville Area Sch......
  • I. Issues of Importance to Lgbtq+ People and People Living with Hiv/aids
    • United States
    • The Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook (CCR) Chapter Three
    • Invalid date
    ...people are also a quasi-suspect class that receive heightened scrutiny. Some of these cases are: Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020); Adams v. Sch. Bd. of St. Johns Cty., 968 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2020); Karnoski v. Trump, 926 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2019); and Whitak......
  • Athletics and title IX of the 1972 education amendments
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIV-2, January 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ...Reg. 32637-01 (effective June 22, 2021) (to be codif‌ied in 34 C.F.R Chapter I). 113. See generally Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020) (holding that the school violated the Equal Protection Clause and discriminated on the basis of sex under Title IX when it ref......
  • Get Started for Free