Grip Nut Co. v. MacLean-Fogg Lock Nut Co.
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
| Writing for the Court | EVANS, PAGE, and SPARKS, Circuit |
| Citation | Grip Nut Co. v. MacLean-Fogg Lock Nut Co., 41 F.2d 721 (7th Cir. 1930) |
| Decision Date | 19 August 1930 |
| Docket Number | No. 4285.,4285. |
| Parties | GRIP NUT CO. v. MacLEAN-FOGG LOCK NUT CO. |
Frank Parker Davis and George I. Haight, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Albert G. McCaleb, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before EVANS, PAGE, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois dismissing the bill of appellant for want of equity. The controversy is the usual one arising where infringement of patent is charged. The patent alleged to have been infringed, invented by William E. Sharp for "Improvement in Lock-Nuts and Processes of Making the Same," is No. 1,271,782, and was granted to appellant July 9, 1918. The defenses presented were invalidity of the so-called Sharp patent and noninfringement. The lower court held there was anticipation of the invention by the disclosure of one Howarth's patent, No. 321,500, issued July 7, 1885; and, alternatively, that if Howarth did not strictly anticipate Sharp, appellee, in following the teachings of Howarth, did not infringe Sharp.
There were six claims under appellant's patent, and infringement is charged on the part of appellee as to each. Typical claims of appellant are No. 1 for the process and No. 6 for the device. They are as follows:
The claims under Howarth's patent, No. 321,500, are as follows:
In describing the means by which his invention may be carried into effect, Howarth, among other things, says:
"One only of the projections d, or more, may be employed as desired, or a projection may be formed around the entire circumference of the edge of the hole through the nut at the outer face thereof when forming the nut-blank, and this projection be hammered or pressed down, so as to press down or indent the convolution or convolutions of the thread next to the outer face of the nut."
On September 8, 1887, British letters patent for "Improvements in Means for Preventing Nuts and Bolts from Working Loose," No. 12,174, were granted to one Bayliss, an associate of Howarth. We quote from the specifications of that patent:
It is observable from Bayliss's Fig. 1 that the lumps referred to are...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Detroit Gasket & Mfg. Co. v. Victor Mfg. & Gasket Co.
...throughout the gasket thickness." 2 Detroit Gasket & Mfg. Co. v. Fitzgerald Mfg. Co., 89 F.2d 178. 3 7 Cir., 101 F.2d 380, 382. 4 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 721, 724. ...