Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 89 Civ. 3185 (RO).

CourtUnited States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
Writing for the CourtMaloney & Anker (Kevin D. Moloney, of counsel), White Plains, N.Y., for plaintiffs
Citation755 F. Supp. 89
Decision Date22 January 1991
Docket Number89 Civ. 3185 (RO).
PartiesHarry M. GROSS and Elizabeth Gross, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant.

755 F. Supp. 89

Harry M. GROSS and Elizabeth Gross, Plaintiffs,
v.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant.

89 Civ. 3185 (RO).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 22, 1991.


Maloney & Anker (Kevin D. Moloney, of counsel), White Plains, N.Y., for plaintiffs.

755 F. Supp. 90

Quirk and Bakalor (Michael Hecht, of counsel), New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Harry Gross alleges that while on line to check-in for an American Airlines flight departing from Phoenix, a woman on line next to him began to fall backwards and when Gross stuck out his arm to grab her, she fell on top of him, causing Gross to fall and injure himself. Gross claims that American was negligent in failing to properly maintain and monitor its curb-side check-in area and should be held liable for the personal injuries he sustained. American now moves for summary judgment.

On the day of the alleged injury, Harry Gross and his wife Elizabeth arrived at the American sidewalk check-in at Phoenix airport. In his deposition, Gross states that he was on line for between five and fifteen minutes when,

Suddenly — I don't know how it happened, but there was a lot of luggage around and the woman on my left, I sort of saw her fall backwards and I stuck my arm out to grab her.
. . . . .
The left arm. I stuck out the left arm and she fell backwards. There were small pieces of luggage all around by her and by others, and she pulled me down and fell on top of me. I fell on the street below the curb.

When asked if he knew what caused the woman to his left to fall backwards, Gross responded that he "would assume" that she was falling over a piece of hand luggage left on the ground, but that he did not actually see her trip over anything. "All I saw, I was looking ahead to the left side and saw someone falling and instinctively I put out my arm to catch her."1 No reasonable inference can be drawn from the evidence presented as to what caused the woman to fall.

Gross further testified that he did not know how many people were in front of or behind him in line, in front of his wife in line,2 or in front of the woman who fell onto him. Although Gross's attorney in his affidavit claims that Gross's injury was due to "overcrowding," the complaint does not actually allege that a crowd existed3 and Gross has failed to introduce any evidence showing that a crowd or a large number of people were in the check-in line at the time the alleged injury occurred.

Gross further alleges that American failed to adequately monitor or control the area, however, he testified that he did not know how many American...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Stagl v. Delta Airlines, Inc., No. 423
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 17, 1995
    ...injuries to passengers that resulted from other passengers' careless placement of luggage, see Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Gray v. America West Airlines, Inc., 209 Cal.App.3d 76, 256 Cal.Rptr. 877 (4th Dist.1989), the district court concluded that Delta ......
  • Farash v. Continental Airlines, Inc., No. 07 Civ. 590(RJS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • May 23, 2008
    ...legal basis for such an assertion. Accordingly, plaintiffs negligence claim fails as a matter of law. See, e.g., Gross v. Am. Airlines, 755 F.Supp. 89, 90 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (declining to impose unreasonable or "silly" duties on American Airlines). As part of his negligence claim, pla......
  • Branche v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., No. CIV.A. 97-40232.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan)
    • November 13, 1997
    ...or posted a warning in the baggage claim area. However, a similar claim was rejected as insufficient in Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1991). In Gross, the court rejected an assertion that the defendant could have placed more attendants on duty. The plaintiff did ......
  • Stagl v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 93-CV-2544 (JRB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • February 22, 1994
    ...was injured by the act of a third party at a time when she no longer was defendant's passenger. In Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1991), the court held that defendant airline owed no duty to plaintiff passenger who was injured at defendant's sidewalk check-in. In ......
4 cases
  • Stagl v. Delta Airlines, Inc., No. 423
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 17, 1995
    ...injuries to passengers that resulted from other passengers' careless placement of luggage, see Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Gray v. America West Airlines, Inc., 209 Cal.App.3d 76, 256 Cal.Rptr. 877 (4th Dist.1989), the district court concluded that Delta ......
  • Farash v. Continental Airlines, Inc., No. 07 Civ. 590(RJS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • May 23, 2008
    ...legal basis for such an assertion. Accordingly, plaintiffs negligence claim fails as a matter of law. See, e.g., Gross v. Am. Airlines, 755 F.Supp. 89, 90 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (declining to impose unreasonable or "silly" duties on American Airlines). As part of his negligence claim, pla......
  • Branche v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., No. CIV.A. 97-40232.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan)
    • November 13, 1997
    ...or posted a warning in the baggage claim area. However, a similar claim was rejected as insufficient in Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1991). In Gross, the court rejected an assertion that the defendant could have placed more attendants on duty. The plaintiff did ......
  • Stagl v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 93-CV-2544 (JRB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • February 22, 1994
    ...was injured by the act of a third party at a time when she no longer was defendant's passenger. In Gross v. American Airlines, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1991), the court held that defendant airline owed no duty to plaintiff passenger who was injured at defendant's sidewalk check-in. In ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT