Gross v. Ward

Decision Date29 January 1965
Citation386 S.W.2d 456
PartiesDortha Nan GROSS, Petitioner, v. Don A. WARD, Judge, Perry Circuit Court, Respondent.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

William H. McCann, Brown, Sledd & McCann, Lexington, for petitioner.

S. M. Ward, Duff Arnett, Hazard, for respondent.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

In this original proceeding Dortha Nan Gross seeks to prohibit the respondent, Honorable Don A. Ward as Judge of the Perry Circuit Court, from proceeding further in an action for divorce filed by her husband, Charles Gross.

The dispositive question is whether Dortha was a nonresident of Kentucty on November 16, 1964, when the action was filed, as that term is used in KRS 452.470. This statute provides:

'An action for alimony or divorce must be brought in the county where the wife usually resides, if she have an actual residence in this state; if not, in the county of the husband's residence.'

The Grosses were married in January, 1964. Charles was attending the University of Kentucty in Fayette County and Dortha had resided in Fayette County for approximately three years. In May, when the spring semester at the University ended, they went to Perry County where Charles' mother lived. In September they returned to Fayette County where a child was born during the following month. Soon thereafter disagreements arose and on November 6, 1964, Dortha took the child for a visit to her mother in Missouri, taking only necessary clothing. Charles filed a divorce action in Perry County while she was gone. On November 26, 1964, Dortha returned to Fayette County and on the following day filed an action for divorce in Fayette Circuit Court. She then moved the respondent to dismiss the action brought against her in Perry Circuit Court for lack of venue.

Respondent found that Dortha was a nonresident of Kentucky on November 16, 1964, and overruled her motion. She then filed the instant proceeding and this Court entered a temporary order, in effect, prohibiting further action in these cases in either the Perry or the Fayette Circuit Courts.

The above-quoted statute requires actual, not merely legal, residence to establish venue. Lanham v. Lanham, 300 Ky. 237, 188 S.W.2d 439, and Luvall v. Luvall, 228 Ky. 577, 15 S.W.2d 433. Upon the record before us it is apparent that Dortha and Charles actually resided in Fayette County. Moreover, the proof does not establish that Dortha intended to change her usual residence when she went to Missouri. Sebastian v. Turner, Ky., 320...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Hummeldorf v. Hummeldorf, 80-CA-1296-MR
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 1 Mayo 1981
    ...foster a race to the courthouse. Nevertheless, because it is the wife's actual and not legal residence which is involved, Gross v. Ward, Ky., 386 S.W.2d 456, 457 (1965), the simple inquiry may be complicated by the need to ascertain her intent to establish an actual residence. With the requ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT