Grove v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
Decision Date | 08 December 1939 |
Docket Number | 213 |
Citation | 336 Pa. 519,9 A.2d 723 |
Parties | Grove v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, Appellant |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued October 4, 1939
Appeal, No. 213, March T., 1939, from orders of C.P Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1938, No. 416, in case of Laura M Grove v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. Judgment affirmed.
Assumpsit. Before T. M. MARSHALL, J.
The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.
Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.
Error assigned, among others, was refusal of judgment n.o.v.
The judgment is affirmed.
Henry Eastman Hackney, with him Seward H. French, Jr., Reed, Smith Shaw & McClay and Karl W. Warmcastle, for appellant.
Elverton Hazlett Wicks, for appellee.
Before KEPHART, C.J., SCHAFFER, MAXEY, LINN, STERN and BARNES, JJ.
Laura M. Grove sued the defendant for $2,000 insurance on the life of her husband, John W. Grove. The jury returned a verdict for the amount of the claim plus interest, to wit: $2,860.00. Defendant's motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial were denied and this appeal followed.
On June 30, 1926, Grove, who was a clerk employed by the Carnegie Steel Company, purchased a participating certificate in the amount of $2,000.00 in Group Policy No. 2181, issued by the defendant to the Homestead Steel Works Employees Insurance and Safety Association of Carnegie Steel Company. In the spring of 1931, Grove became ill but he continued working until June 9, 1931. He was unable to work thereafter. The superintendent took the insured's employment card and wrote thereon: "Terminated June 15, 1931, and paid to June 30th, inclusive." Later he cancelled this termination by drawing a line through what he had written and then wrote: "Leave of absence for two months with the understanding he will not be back to this department." The card shows a further notation: "Leave of absence extended 2 months 8-31-31." This meant that the leave of absence was extended to October 31, 1931. Below this appears the notation: "Died 11-27-1931," i.e., November 27, 1931. No termination or notice of discharge appears upon the employment card which constitutes the official employment record of Grove with the Carnegie Steel Company.
William M. Menk, the Assistant Superintendent of the Plate Department of the steel company, testified that when an employee's connection with the company is finally terminated, he is given "a written termination notice through the employment office." He was asked: "Did you give him [Grove] such a notice?" He answered: He gave as a reason for the leave of absence the following: He said that the leave of absence was extended and that he signed the extension. There was no other leave of absence. He also admitted that he "scratched out" the notation on the employment card: "Terminated June 15, 1931." The reason he did this was because of Grove's request for a leave of absence. After the re-instatement of the employee by striking out the termination phrase on the employment card, there is no evidence in the record of either a written or oral termination or discharge notice having been given to this employee. The insurance company claims that the insured's employment was terminated prior to his death and that therefore the following provision of the policy becomes operative: "Termination and Conversion: The insurance upon the life of any member shall automatically cease upon his discontinuance of participation as evidenced in writing signed by him and filed with the Society, or upon termination of his membership in said Association or upon his ceasing to follow the occupation above specified."
The court below in its opinion correctly said:
In view of the fact that the words: "Terminated June 15, 1931, and paid to June 30th, inclusive," on the employment card were later cancelled, the only significant thing remaining on the card is the following: "Leave of absence extended 2 months 8-31-31," and beneath that: "Died 11-27-1931." The court below in its opinion said. Though it was testified by the Assistant Superintendent that when an employee's employment ceases, he gets a termination notice, it is a fact that Grove never received such a notice.
In the case of Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 119 Pa.Super. 52, the beneficiary of a group insurance policy brought an action to recover an amount specified in the policy which had been issued to her late husband, an employee of the Pressed Steel Car Company. The policy provided that $1,000 would be paid the beneficiary "if death occurs while the employee is in the employ of the employer and while said group policy is in force." The question was whether or not his death occurred during his employment. President Judge KELLER says in that case: The Superior Court held in that case that "there was ample evidence to support a finding by the jury that Ozanich was an employee of the Pressed Steel Car Company, within the meaning of the policy, on the day of his death."
The Secretary of the Employees' Association Union testified in the case at bar that he terminated the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nick v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...Life Ins. Co., supra; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Wells, supra; McDonald v. Penn. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 186 A. 234; Grove v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 9 A.2d 723; Cipa v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 38 A.2d Perkins v. Eagle Lock Co., 118 Conn. 658, 174 A. 77; Liner v. Travelers Ins. Co., ......
-
Hisak v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.
...509, 105 A. 821, 823; Commonwealth v. Ross, 266 Pa. 580, 584, 110 A. 327, 328, 329; Grove v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States, 336 Pa. 519, 524, 9 A.2d 723, 725, 726. Because we are of opinion that a new trial must therefore be granted, it is not necessary to discuss two other co......
-
Hisak v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.
... ... one which correctly states the law on the point involved, for ... the jury, ... 580, 584, 110 A. 327, 328, 329; Grove v. Equitable Life ... Assurance Society of the ... ...
-
Peyton v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Of The United States.
...issue was whether the insured was totally disabled within the terms of the policy. Grove v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States, 336 Pa. 519, 9 A.2d 723, and Poch v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States, 343 Pa. 119, 22 A.2d 590, 142 A.L.R. 1279, to which reference is made by......