Gruntz, In re
| Decision Date | 19 May 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-55379,97-55379 |
| Citation | 177 F.3d 728 |
| Parties | 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3669, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4722, 3 Cal. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 53 In re Robert GRUNTZ, Debtor. Robert Gruntz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Los Angeles District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles
...determining whether the conviction was void because the criminal proceedings violated the automatic stay. See Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles, 177 F.3d 728 (9th Cir. 1999). We vacated the panel's decision and agreed to rehear the appeal en Because Rooker-Feldman arises from federal jurisdic......
-
In re Glass
...panel opinion in Gruntz was withdrawn and the case was ordered to be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. See 177 F.3d 728. The Court agrees with the holdings in the Second and Sixth Circuits that "the court in which the litigation claimed to be stayed is pending has ......
-
In re Siskin
...decision on February 3, 2000 by the Ninth Circuit in In re Gruntz, 166 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir.1999), opinion amended and superseded by 177 F.3d 728 (9th Cir. 1999), reh'g en banc granted, opinion withdrawn by 177 F.3d 729 (9th Cir.1999), opinion after reh'g 202 F.3d 1074 (9th DISCUSSION 1. The ......
-
In re Lenke
...F.3d 729 (9th Cir.1999). The amended panel opinion no longer appears in West's Federal Reporter Third Series, but can still be found at 177 F.3d 728 as it appears in West's Bankruptcy Reporter vol. 4 The opinion does not explain why it uses the arcane term "plenary," which it uses at least ......
Request a trial to view additional results