GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER ET AL.

Decision Date23 June 2003
Citation539 U.S. 306
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Syllabus

GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER ET AL.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

No.02-241. Argued April 1, 2003-Decided June 23, 2003

The University of Michigan Law School (Law School), one of the Nation's top law schools, follows an official admissions policy that seeks to achieve student body diversity through compliance with Regents of Univ. of Gal. v. Bakke, 438 U. S. 265. Focusing on students' academic ability coupled with a flexible assessment of their talents, experiences, and potential, the policy requires admissions officials to evaluate each applicant based on all the information available in the file, including a personal statement, letters of recommendation, an essay describing how the applicant will contribute to Law School life and diversity, and the applicant's undergraduate grade point average (GPA) and Law School Admission Test (LSAT) score. Additionally, officials must look beyond grades and scores to so-called "soft variables," such as recommenders' enthusiasm, the quality of the undergraduate institution and the applicant's essay, and the areas and difficulty of undergraduate course selection. The policy does not define diversity solely in terms of racial and ethnic status and does not restrict the types of diversity contributions eligible for "substantial weight," but it does reaffirm the Law School's commitment to diversity with special reference to the inclusion of African-American, Hispanic, and Native-American students, who otherwise might not be represented in the student body in meaningful numbers. By enrolling a "critical mass" of underrepresented minority students, the policy seeks to ensure their ability to contribute to the Law School's character and to the legal profession.

When the Law School denied admission to petitioner Grutter, a white Michigan resident with a 3.8 GPA and 161 LSAT score, she filed this suit, alleging that respondents had discriminated against her on the basis of race in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U. S. C. § 1981; that she was rejected because the Law School uses race as a "predominant" factor, giving applicants belonging to certain minority groups a significantly greater chance of admission than students with similar credentials from disfavored racial groups; and that respondents had no compelling interest to justify that use of race. The District Court found the Law School's use of race as an admissions factor unlawful. The Sixth Circuit reversed, holding that Justice Powell's opinion in Bakke was binding precedent establishing

307

diversity as a compelling state interest, and that the Law School's use of race was narrowly tailored because race was merely a "potential 'plus' factor" and because the Law School's program was virtually identical to the Harvard admissions program described approvingly by Justice Powell and appended to his Bakke opinion.

Held: The Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body is not prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause, Title VI, or § 1981. Pp. 322-344.

(a) In the landmark Bakke case, this Court reviewed a medical school's racial set-aside program that reserved 16 out of 100 seats for members of certain minority groups. The decision produced six separate opinions, none of which commanded a majority. Four Justices would have upheld the program on the ground that the government can use race to remedy disadvantages cast on minorities by past racial prejudice. 438 U. S., at 325. Four other Justices would have struck the program down on statutory grounds. Id., at 408. Justice Powell, announcing the Court's judgment, provided a fifth vote not only for invalidating the program, but also for reversing the state court's injunction against any use of race whatsoever. In a part of his opinion that was joined by no other Justice, Justice Powell expressed his view that attaining a diverse student body was the only interest asserted by the university that survived scrutiny. Id., at 311. Grounding his analysis in the academic freedom that "long has been viewed as a special concern of the First Amendment," id., at 312, 314, Justice Powell emphasized that the "'nation's future depends upon leaders trained through wide exposure' to the ideas and mores of students as diverse as this Nation." Id., at 313. However, he also emphasized that "[i]t is not an interest in simple ethnic diversity, in which a specified percentage of the student body is in effect guaranteed to be members of selected ethnic groups," that can justify using race. Id., at 315. Rather, "[t]he diversity that furthers a compelling state interest encompasses a far broader array of qualifications and characteristics of which racial or ethnic origin is but a single though important element." Ibid. Since Bakke, Justice Powell's opinion has been the touchstone for constitutional analysis of raceconscious admissions policies. Public and private universities across the Nation have modeled their own admissions programs on Justice Powell's views. Courts, however, have struggled to discern whether Justice Powell's diversity rationale is binding precedent. The Court finds it unnecessary to decide this issue because the Court endorses Justice Powell's view that student body diversity is a compelling state interest in the context of university admissions. Pp. 322-325.

308

Syllabus

(b) All government racial classifications must be analyzed by a reviewing court under strict scrutiny. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U. S. 200, 227. But not all such uses are invalidated by strict scrutiny. Race-based action necessary to further a compelling governmental interest does not violate the Equal Protection Clause so long as it is narrowly tailored to further that interest. E. g., Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U. S. 899, 908. Context matters when reviewing such action. See Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U. S. 339, 343-344. Not every decision influenced by race is equally objectionable, and strict scrutiny is designed to provide a framework for carefully examining the importance and the sincerity of the government's reasons for using race in a particular context. Pp. 326-327.

(c) The Court endorses Justice Powell's view that student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify using race in university admissions. The Court defers to the Law School's educational judgment that diversity is essential to its educational mission. The Court's scrutiny of that interest is no less strict for taking into account complex educational judgments in an area that lies primarily within the university's expertise. See, e. g., Bakke, 438 U. S., at 319, n. 53 (opinion of Powell, J.). Attaining a diverse student body is at the heart of the Law School's proper institutional mission, and its "good faith" is "presumed" absent "a showing to the contrary." Id., at 318-319. Enrolling a "critical mass" of minority students simply to assure some specified percentage of a particular group merely because of its race or ethnic origin would be patently unconstitutional. E. g., id., at 307. But the Law School defines its critical mass concept by reference to the substantial, important, and laudable educational benefits that diversity is designed to produce, including cross-racial understanding and the breaking down of racial stereotypes. The Law School's claim is further bolstered by numerous expert studies and reports showing that such diversity promotes learning outcomes and better prepares students for an increasingly diverse work force, for society, and for the legal profession. Major American businesses have made clear that the skills needed in today's increasingly global marketplace can only be developed through exposure to widely diverse people, cultures, ideas, and viewpoints. High-ranking retired officers and civilian military leaders assert that a highly qualified, racially diverse officer corps is essential to national security. Moreover, because universities, and in particular, law schools, represent the training ground for a large number of the Nation's leaders, Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U. S. 629, 634, the path to leadership must be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity. Thus, the Law School has a compelling interest in attaining a diverse student body. Pp. 327-333.

309

(d) The Law School's admissions program bears the hallmarks of a narrowly tailored plan. To be narrowly tailored, a race-conscious admissions program cannot "insulat[e] each category of applicants with certain desired qualifications from competition with all other applicants." Bakke, 438 U. S., at 315 (opinion of Powell, J.). Instead, it may consider race or ethnicity only as a "'plus' in a particular applicant's file"; i. e., it must be "flexible enough to consider all pertinent elements of diversity in light of the particular qualifications of each applicant, and to place them on the same footing for consideration, although not necessarily according them the same weight," id., at 317. It follows that universities cannot establish quotas for members of certain racial or ethnic groups or put them on separate admissions tracks. See id., at 315-316. The Law School's admissions program, like the Harvard plan approved by Justice Powell, satisfies these requirements. Moreover, the program is flexible enough to ensure that each applicant is evaluated as an individual and not in a way that makes race or ethnicity the defining feature of the application. See id., at 317. The Law School engages in a highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file, giving serious consideration to all the ways an applicant might contribute to a diverse educational environment. There is no policy, either de jure or de facto, of automatic acceptance or rejection based on any single "soft" var...

To continue reading

Request your trial
521 cases
  • Stennett v. Miller
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 12 d5 Abril d5 2019
  • Mohamed v. Holder, Civil Action No. 1:11cv0050 (AJT/MSN)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 20 d4 Julho d4 2017
  • Vitolo v. Guzman
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • 19 d3 Maio d3 2021
  • Mathis v. Brazoria Cnty. Sheriff's Office
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 17 d3 Agosto d3 2011
    ... ... at 723, 125 S.Ct. 2113 (quoting Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 327, 123 S. Ct. 2325, 156 L. Ed.2d 304 (2003)). Courts should apply the "compelling governmental interest" standard with ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
51 firm's commentaries
  • Chapter 3 Discrimination
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 10 d5 Fevereiro d5 2012
    ...citations and a more detailed analysis will find them in the footnotes. 2.Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S.Ct. 2658 (2009); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 3.We use the terms "company" and "employer" synonymously as terms for entities that have employees, whether private, not for profit, govern......
  • What Does Affirmative Action's Death Knell Mean For Employers?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 14 d5 Julho d5 2023
    ...in employee hiring, the initial wave of which may already be felt. Chief Justice Roberts' opinion relied heavily on Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 123 S. Ct. 2325, 156 L. Ed. 2d 304 (2003). Grutter held that the Equal Protection Clause did not prohibit the University of Michigan Law Sc......
  • Implications Of U.S. Supreme Court Decision Overturning Affirmative Action Precedent In Higher Education
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 8 d5 Setembro d5 2023
    ...higher education, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Regents of the Univ. of California v. Bakke,438 U.S. 265 (1978) and Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 334 (2003), and affirmed in the June 2023 decision,that "outright racial balancing" and "quota system[s]" are "patently unconstitutional" ......
  • Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 And Affirmative Action
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 10 d3 Maio d3 2023
    ...such as race and sex. See, e.g., Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 305 (1978) (Powell, J.); Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 328 (2003) (explaining that there are other permissible uses of race besides "remedying past discrimination"); see also Johnson v. Transp. Age......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
238 books & journal articles
  • Frederick Mark Gedicks, the United States
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory International Law Reviews No. 19-2, March 2005
    • Invalid date
    ...that benign racial preferences that satisfy intermediate scrutiny should satisfy strict scrutiny as well). 199 Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 329 (2003) (holding that state-sponsored law school's consideration of an applicant's race as one competitive factor among many others in the ad......
  • Reevaluating Suspect Classifications
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 35-01, September 2011
    • Invalid date
    ...Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432 (1985), and USDA v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973), and "strict scrutiny minus" in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), and Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). Under any of these approaches, however, the Court attempts to justify the level o......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • 1 d1 Janeiro d1 2007
    ...Grupo Mexicana de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308, 119 S.Ct. 1961, 144 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999), 401 Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304 (2003), 255, 375, 448, 547, 1140, 1142, Guiles ex rel. Lucas v. Marineau, 461 F.3d 320 (2nd Cir. 2006), 142......
  • RACE-BASED REMEDIES IN CRIMINAL LAW.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 63 No. 1, October 2021
    • 1 d5 Outubro d5 2021
    ...O'Connor was so intent on "second-guessing Richmond's judgment" as to the existence of past discrimination), with Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 315, 318. 328 (2003) (upholding admissions policy's "flexible assessment" that considered undergraduate GPA and test scores, but also "'soft'......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT