Guardian Builders, LLC v. Randy United Stateselton & Melissa United Stateselton
Decision Date | 31 May 2013 |
Docket Number | 1111375. |
Citation | 130 So.3d 179 |
Parties | GUARDIAN BUILDERS, LLC, and Wayne Tackett v. Randy USELTON and Melissa Uselton. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Gary K. Grace and Bree Taylor Wilbourn of Grace, Matthews & Debro, LLC, Huntsville, for appellants.
Melissa D. Endsley and Thomas S. McGrath of McGrath Law Firm, Huntsville, for appellees.
Guardian Builders, LLC, and Wayne Tackett (collectively “Guardian”) appeal from an order purporting to deny Guardian's motion to vacate or modify an arbitration award entered in favor of Randy Uselton and Melissa Uselton. We vacate the order and dismiss the appeal.
In April 2010, the Useltons sued Guardian in the Madison Circuit Court, alleging several claims arising from Guardian's construction of a house for the Useltons. Guardian subsequently filed a motion to compel arbitration, and the circuit court granted that motion in October 2010. On December 21, 2011, the arbitrator entered a final award in favor of the Useltons in the amount of $452,275.20. On January 11, 2012, Guardian filed with the circuit court a motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award, to which it attached a copy of the arbitration award. On May 15, 2012, the Useltons filed a “motion to confirm” the arbitration award and a response to Guardian's motion to vacate or modify. On May 31, 2012, the circuit court entered an order purporting to deny Guardian's motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award, purporting to grant the Useltons' motion to confirm the arbitration award, and purporting to order Guardian to pay $1,421.75 in Better Business Bureau fees and facility costs related to the arbitration. Guardian appealed.
The Useltons move this Court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Guardian failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 71B, Ala. R. Civ. P., which establishes the procedure for appealing an arbitration award to the circuit court. Rule 71B provides:
Thus, Rule 71B establishes the following procedure for the appeal of an arbitration award: (1) A party must file a notice of appeal with the appropriate circuit court within 30 days after service of the notice of the arbitration award; (2) the clerk of the circuit court shall promptly enter the award as the final judgment of the circuit court; (3) the aggrieved party may file a Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P., motion to set aside or vacate the judgment, and such filing is a condition precedent to further review by any appellate court; (4) the circuit court grants or denies the Rule 59 motion; and (5) the aggrieved party may then appeal from the circuit court's judgment to the appropriate appellate court.
“Pursuant to this rule, the aggrieved party has no right to appellate review of an arbitration award unless that party has appealed to the circuit court from the arbitration award within 30 days of service of the notice of the award and has timely filed a Rule 59 motion to set aside or vacate the judgment on the arbitration award as described above.”
Committee Comments to Rule 71B Effective February 1, 2009.
In this case, Guardian never filed with the circuit court a document titled a “notice of appeal.” Rather, Guardian attempted to appeal from the arbitration award by filing with the circuit court a motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award, which Guardian filed within 30 days of the entry of the award. The Useltons argue that Guardian does not have a right to appellate review because Guardian did not file a notice of appeal; instead, it filed only a motion to vacate or modify. Conversely, Guardian argues that its motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award may be construed to be both a notice of appeal and a Rule 59 motion, filed pursuant to Rule 71B.
In J.L. Loper Construction Co. v. Findout Partnership, LLP, 55 So.3d 1152 (Ala.2010), this Court addressed a similar situation. In Loper, an arbitrator entered an award in favor of Findout and adverse to Loper. Loper filed with the circuit court a motion to set aside the award. Findout subsequently moved the circuit court to confirm the award, and Loper filed a motion to enjoin Findout from attempting to collect the award. Although Loper did not file a “notice of appeal,” the circuit court treated the motions filed by Loper—the motion to set aside the award and the motion to enjoin enforcement of the award—“ ‘as an appeal of th[e] award’ ” under Rule 71B. 55 So.3d at 1157 ( ). The circuit court ordered the clerk of the circuit court to enter the arbitration award as the judgment of that court in accordance with Rule 71B(f). The circuit court then considered Loper's motion to set aside, i.e., its Rule 59 motion, and granted that motion. Findout appealed to this Court.
In Loper, this Court did not conclude that Loper's failure to file a separate document titled a “notice of appeal,” in addition to the two motions filed by Loper, precluded further appellate review. Instead, it noted that the circuit court had considered Loper's motions challenging the arbitration award as a notice of appeal of the award. This Court then reviewed the merits of the circuit court's judgment setting aside the arbitration award and reversed that judgment. Thus, based on Loper, the circuit court in this case could have treated Guardian's motion to vacate or modify as a notice of appeal. Guardian attached to that motion a copy of the arbitration award and served a copy of the motion on the Useltons; that motion provided notice that Guardian was appealing the award. We construe Guardian's motion as a notice of appeal in this case; however, we emphasize that, to avoid potential confusion, a party desiring appellate review of an arbitration award should follow the explicit procedure for appealing established by Rule 71B.
Although we construe Guardian's motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award as a notice of appeal, we must address additional issues concerning the procedure for appealing an arbitration award used in this case. Most importantly, after Guardian appealed to the circuit court, i.e., after it filed its motion to vacate or modify the award, there is no indication that the clerk of the circuit court entered the arbitration award as the judgment of that court as required by Rule 71B(f). That rule provides that “[t]he clerk of the circuit court promptly shall enter the award as the final judgment of the court” after the filing of the notice of appeal in that court. Rule 71B, which became effective on February 1, 2009, superseded the procedure established by § 6–6–15, Ala.Code 1975. Committee Comments to Rule 71B Effective February 1, 2009 (“[Rule 71B] clarifies the method for taking an appeal from an arbitration award and supersedes the procedure provided by Ala.Code 1975, § 6–6–15.”); and Parham v. American Bankers Ins. Co. of Florida, 24 So.3d 1102, 1104 n. 2 (Ala.2009). Although Rule 71B superseded the procedure established by § 6–6–15, the two procedures are similar in some respects; that similarity informs our discussion on the effect of the noncompliance with Rule 71B(f) in this case.
Under § 6–6–15, a party initiated an appeal from an arbitration award by filing a notice of appeal in the circuit court. See generally Horton Homes, Inc. v. Shaner, 999 So.2d 462, 467 (Ala.2008) ( ). Like the current procedure under Rule 71B(f), under §...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.
...to vacate an arbitration award as a notice of appeal for purposes of Rule 71B, which superseded § 6–6–15. Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton, 130 So.3d 179, 182 (Ala. 2013). See also J.L. Loper Constr. Co. v. Findout Partnership, LLP, 55 So.3d 1152 (Ala. 2010).2 Thus, we conclude that, in su......
-
Ala. Psychiatric Servs., P.C. v. Lazenby
...(5) the aggrieved party may then appeal from the circuit court's judgment to the appropriate appellate court." Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton, 130 So. 3d 179, 181 (Ala. 2013). This case has various procedural irregularities that initially must be sorted out. First, APS and MHCA, in appea......
-
Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton
...We reverse and remand.I.This Court previously dismissed a premature appeal filed by Guardian in this action. Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton, 130 So.3d 179 (Ala.2013). At that time, we summarized the history of the parties' dispute as follows:“In April 2010, the Useltons sued Guardian in ......
-
Russell Constr. of Ala., Inc. v. Peat
...(5) the aggrieved party may then appeal from the circuit court's judgment to the appropriate appellate court." Guardian Builders, LLC v. Uselton, 130 So. 3d 179, 181 (Ala. 2013).To the extent that Peat argues that his March 13, 2019, answer to Russell's Rule 71C motion was, in substance, a ......