Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Muniz, 95-4827

Decision Date06 August 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-4827,95-4827
Citation101 F.3d 93
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 575 GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Estevan M. MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellee. Non-Argument Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Karen Curtis, Gallwey, Gillman, Curtis, Vento & Horn, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Diego C. Ascencio, W. Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before ANDERSON, EDMONDSON and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America ("Guardian") filed this action in the district court, seeking cancellation of a life insurance policy issued to Estevan M. Muniz on the basis of alleged misrepresentations in the insurance application. The complaint alleges diversity of citizenship, and that more than $50,000 is involved. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The face value of the life insurance policy is $100,000.

Muniz filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to meet the minimum amount in controversy requirement. The district court granted the motion. In its order dismissing the case, the district court rejected Guardian's argument that the amount in controversy is $100,000, the face value of the policy. The court stated:

[T]he condition precedent to liability under the policy at issue has not even arguably occurred--[Muniz] is still alive. Thus, under no circumstances could [Guardian] be held liable for the full face amount of the policy. It is therefore legally certain that the amount in controversy in this case is below the requisite amount and this Court has no jurisdiction.

The district court failed to address New York Life Ins. Co. v. Swift, 38 F.2d 175 (5th Cir.1930), which is binding authority on the same subject. 1 In that case, an insurance company filed suit to cancel two life insurance policies, each with a face value of $10,000, on the basis of false representations in the applications. See id. at 176. The district court dismissed the case for failure to meet the amount in controversy requirement (which, at the time, was $3,000). "Apparently the district court reached the conclusion that the amount involved was to be measured by the loan value, cash surrender value, or paid-up value of the policies, none of which had accrued in any amount at the time the suit was filed." Id. The former Fifth Circuit reversed, holding that the face value of the policies constituted the jurisdictional amount. The court explained:

The policies in suit are contracts by which the insured agrees to pay the premiums and the insurer agrees to pay the full face value of the policies on the death of the insured, an event bound to happen. With the uncertainty of life, it may occur at any time, and is an ever-present liability,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • In re the Prudential Ins. Co. of America
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • March 17, 1997
    ...feature, was amount in controversy in suit seeking declaratory relief restoring policy to force); Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Muniz, 101 F.3d 93, 94 (11th Cir.1996) (face value of policy, not loan value, cash surrender value, or paid-up value of polices, was amount in controversy i......
  • Koester v. State Farm Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • October 22, 2012
    ...controls where the parties' dispute involves either the validity of the policy itself, see Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Amer. v. Muniz, 101 F.3d 93, 94-95 (11th Cir. 1996) (per curiam), or coverage for claims that appear to put the face amount of the policy at issue, e.g., C.E. Carnes & Co. v.......
  • Hawkins v. Aid Ass'n for Lutherans
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • August 5, 2003
    ...841 (7th Cir.1966). See also Budget Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Higashiguchi, 109 F.3d 1471, 1473 (9th Cir.1997); Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Muniz, 101 F.3d 93, 94 (11th Cir. 1996); Mass. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Harmon, 88 F.3d 415, 416 (6th Cir.1996). Accordingly, we find that the court had subject......
  • Slover v. Equitable Variable Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Oklahoma
    • August 9, 2006
    ...of insurance policies, the face value of the policy is the measure of the amount in controversy."), and Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. v. Muniz, 101 F.3d 93, 94 (11th Cir. 1996) (noting that the face value of life insurance policies constitutes the amount in controversy)); see also Mass. Cas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT