Guardianship of Grant, Matter of

Decision Date15 July 1988
Docket NumberNo. 52609-5
CitationGuardianship of Grant, Matter of, 757 P.2d 534 (Wash. 1988)
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesIn the Matter of the GUARDIANSHIP of Barbara GRANT, Judith Grant, Appellant, Hugh M. Robinson, Respondent.

It is hereby ordered that in the above case, as the same appears at 109 Wash.2d 545, the name of Durham, J., is removed from the end of the opinion authored by Callow, J.

It is further ordered that, in such case, the name of Durham, J., is appended at the end of the opinion...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • In re AMB
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan
    • January 25, 2002
    ... 640 N.W.2d 262 248 Mich. App. 144 In the Matter of AMB, Minor ... Family Independence Agency, Petitioner-Appellee, Family Independence Agency, ... 132 Rosebush, by approving the reasoning in In re Guardianship of Barry, 133 also rejected the proposition that parents must qualify as guardians before being ... 386, 389, 461 N.W.2d 671 (1990) ("The Legislature has given a broad grant" of authority to the probate court to protect children who come within its jurisdiction.\") ...  \xC2" ... ...
  • McNabb v. Department of Corrections
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • April 10, 2008
    ... ... IV. ANALYSIS ...         ¶ 8 As a preliminary matter, we will define the terms used to describe the constitutional right at issue here. The dissent ... as the right to refuse "artificial means of nutrition and hydration." In re Guardianship of Grant, 109 Wash.2d 545, 565, 747 P.2d 445, 757 P.2d 534 (1988). This right is subject to the ... ...
  • State v. Rivers
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • October 24, 1996
    ... ... who had talked with Defendant Rivers and his girlfriend earlier that day about a different matter. The officers stated that at the time of the earlier contact Defendant Rivers had been wearing a ... Compare In re Grant, 18 Cal.3d 1, 553 P.2d 590, 132 Cal.Rptr. 430 (1976) (California statute which precludes parole ... to provide support for their minor children is a principle of natural law); In re Guardianship Grant, 109 Wash.2d 545, 580, 747 P.2d 445 (1987) (Goodloe, J., dissenting) (sanctity of human life ... ...
  • Rosebush, In re
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan
    • September 8, 1992
    ... ... 439, 321 S.E.2d 716 (1984); In re Lawrance, 579 N.E.2d 32, 37 (Ind.1991); In re Guardianship of Hamlin, 102 Wash.2d 810, 689 P.2d 1372 (1984) ...         Joelle Rosebush was born on ...         Although judicial intervention need not be solicited as a matter of course, still the courts must always be open to hear these matters on request of the family, ...         The best interests standard was summarized in In re Guardianship of Grant, supra, as follows: ...         There will be many situations where it cannot be ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • The best interests standards: a comparison of the state's parens patriae authority and judicial oversight in best interests determinations for children and incompetent patients.
    • United States
    • Issues in Law & Medicine Vol. 7 No. 3, December 1991
    • December 22, 1991
    ...Med. Ctr., 129 A.D.2d 1, 516 N.Y.S.2d 677 (1987); In re Guardianship of Grant, 109 Wash. 2d 545, 747 P.2d 445 (1987) (en banc), modified, 757 P.2d 534 (Wash. 1988). See also infra notes 355-57 and accompanying (16) See, e.g., In re Conservatorship of Torres, 357 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. 1984) (con......
  • §19.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 19 Rule 19.Joinder of Persons Needed for Just Adjudication
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Snohomish Cnty., 96 Wn.2d 201, 634 P.2d 853 (1981); see also In re Guardianship of Grant, 109 Wn.2d 545, 569, 747 P.2d 445, amended, 757 P.2d 534 (1988)(state waived right to joinder by agreeing to be bound in case in which state's interest was litigated by others). Parties who have no c......
  • §6.3 Planning for Health Care Decisions
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Estate Planning, Probate, and Trust Administration in Washington (WSBA) Chapter 6
    • Invalid date
    ...dignity resulting from the medical condition and treatment. In re Guardianship of Grant, 109 Wn.2d 545, 568, 747 P.2d 445 (1987), amended, 757 P.2d 534 (1988). Any of the incapacitated person's family members, guardian, physicians, or hospital may petition for court intervention to challeng......