Guidry v. Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc.
Decision Date | 01 June 2022 |
Docket Number | 21-507 |
Citation | 341 So.3d 779 |
Parties | Sheila Broussard GUIDRY v. AVE MARIA ROSARY & CENACLE, INC., et al |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
John W. Milton, Karnina Dargin King, Ryan El. King, King Milton Law Group, LLC, 210 East Willow Street, P.O. Box 91362, Lafayette, Louisiana 70509, (337) 548-3030, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: Sheila Broussard Guidry
Bruce Gaudin, Attorney at Law, 100 West Bellevue, Opelousas, Louisiana 70570, (337) 948-3818, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc., et al
Court composed of Elizabeth A. Pickett, Billy Howard Ezell, and Jonathan W. Perry, Judges.
This case involves an action of Sheila Broussard Guidry ("Sheila") to recover a one-acre parcel of immovable property from Ave Maria Rosary & Cenacle, Inc. ("Ave Maria") as well as her petition for declaratory judgment as owner of the one-acre parcel.1 Sheila appeals2 the dismissal of her claims on peremptory exceptions of no cause of action, no right of action, and prescription, as well as the granting of an adverse motion for partial summary judgment.3 After conducting a de novo review, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
This case focuses on the ownership of property. Thus, we will begin our factual discussion with a brief description of the property in question to aid our later examination of the issues presented in this appeal.
On January 15, 1953, Jeffrey L. David, Sr., ("Jeffrey") and his wife Viola Perrodin ("Viola") sold the following property to René Broussard ("René"), a married man whose wife was Mable Felix ("Mable"). The property is described as follows:
Subsequently, on September 7, 1968, René and Mable donated the following property to their son, Joseph R. Broussard ("Joseph"),4 to-wit:
A plat of survey dated August 18, 1968, by Morgan Goudeau is attached to the donation.
Thereafter, on May 27, 1969, René and Mable executed a cash sale deed to Joseph and his wife Rose Kilchrist ("Rose") for the sum of $557.00. The cash sale deed identifies the same property described in the donation to Joseph dated September 7, 1968, and the same plat of survey attached to that earlier donation.5
Subsequently, on August 29, 1988, Mable, widow of René, executed a remunerative and onerous donation to Joseph of her one-half interest in the remaining twenty-four (24) acres she and her husband had acquired from Jeffrey and Viola on January 15, 1953. In making this donation, Mable specifically noted that she and René had earlier transferred a one-acre parcel to Joseph and Rose on May 27, 1969.
On March 24, 1995, a judgment of possession in the Successions of Mable and René ("the decedents") was entered recognizing Joseph and Joseph Cormier ("Cormier") as the sole heirs of René and Mable, entitling them to three-fourths and one-fourth interests, respectively, in the 25 acres6 the decedents had acquired from Jeffrey and Viola.
Shortly thereafter, on April 12, 1995, Cormier sold his one-fourth interest in the inherited property to Joseph. In that cash deed, it is stated that Joseph was acquiring Cormier's interest as his separate property. Joseph's wife, Rose, did not sign this cash deed.
The following month, on May 8, 1995, Joseph executed a donation inter vivos to his two daughters, Vanessa Ann Broussard Walker ("Vanessa") and Sheila, of 18 acres acquired by him and more fully described as the property earlier acquired by René and Mable from Jeffrey and Viola on January 15, 1953, as more fully described as Lot 1 of the plat of survey made by F. S. Roberts, C.E., dated August 22, 1949. Although the donation references an 18-acre tract, the plat of survey referenced in the donation states the tract encompasses 25 acres.7 Vanessa and Sheila appeared accepting the donation inter vivos as their separate property. Ultimately, through a series of notarial acts described below between January 31, 2002, and June 25, 2008, Vanessa divested herself of all ownership in the donated tract.
On November 1, 2000, approximately five and one-half years after their donation inter vivos to Vanessa and Sheila, Joseph and Rose donated a one-acre parcel of land to Ave Maria, a non-profit Louisiana corporation. The parcel is described as:
Further stipulated in the donation is a provision stating that if the property is "no longer used for religious purposes and this corporation is dissolved, the land shall revert to donors, JOSEPH BROUSSARD and ROSE KILCHRIST BROUSSARD, and/or their descendants in full ownership." Fay Perry Smithey and Joseph, respectively, the president and vice-president of Ave Maria, accepted this donation.
On January 31, 2002, Sheila and Vanessa executed an act in which they granted Joseph and Rose a usufruct over the tract donated to them on May 8, 1995. Joseph and Rose appeared in the document to accept the usufruct granted to them. On that same date, Vanessa donated her one-half interest in the home located on this same tract.
On May 10, 2004, Joseph and Rose filed an authentic act in which they revoked the donation8 they earlier made to Vanessa and Sheila on May 9, 1995. The next day, Joseph and Rose donated the same tract, but now described as containing twenty-four acres, to Vanessa and Sheila who appeared accepting the donation. The donation specified that the north twelve acres were Vanessa's, and the south twelve acres were Sheila's.
Later, on June 7, 2006, an act of correction was confected, stating that Vanessa was mistakenly included in the donation of May 10, 2004. Nevertheless, on July 10, 2006, Sheila donated a one-half interest, consisting of the north twelve acres, to Vanessa. Subsequently, on June 25, 2008, Sheila revoked the donation, and Vanessa specifically stated that she did "hereby transfer, assign, and donate unto [Sheila] all of her interest in and to the subject property, with full subrogation to all rights and actions against all previous owners."
On May 8, 2009, Joseph and Rose entered into an act of exchange with Ave Maria. It is alleged that this exchange was necessitated because Ave Maria erected constructions beyond the eastern boundary of the one-acre parcel donated to it in 2000. In the exchange, Joseph and Rose conveyed a strip of property of 0.114 acres which abutted the eastern side of the 1-acre tract they had earlier donated to Ave Maria. And, in return, Ave Maria conveyed to Joseph and Rose a strip of property of 0.114 acres which was within and along the southern side of the one-acre tract earlier donated to it. These properties were more fully described in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McKay v. Fontenot
...opposition to the exception, however, a trial court's findings of fact are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review." Id. at 797 (quoting Rain CII Carbon, LLC Turner Indus. Grp., LLC, 19-403 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/18/20), 297 So.3d 797, writ denied, 20-774 (La. 10/20/20), 3......