Guirlando v. Roberts
Decision Date | 24 August 2021 |
Docket Number | Civil 1:20-cv-01007 |
Parties | MARCO GUIRLANDO PLAINTIFF v. SHERIFF RICKY ROBERTS; CAPTAIN RICHARD MITCHAM; LT. KEVIN PENDLETON; LT. PAUL KUGLER; LT. BILLY PERRY; SGT JOHN WARD; SGT. JEDIDIAH COTTON; DR. DEANNA HOPSON; and NURSE SHERIE RICE DEFENDANTS |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas |
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Roberts, Mitcham, Pendleton, Kugler, Cotton and Rice. (ECF No. 73).[1] Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1) and (3)(2011), the Honorable Susan O Hickey, Chief United States District Judge, referred this case to the undersigned for the purpose of making a Report and Recommendation.
Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in the Federal Detention Center in Miami, Florida. His claims in this lawsuit arise from his incarceration in the Union County Detention Center (“UCDC”) in 2019 and 2020. Plaintiff filed his initial Complaint on March 12, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The following day, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint to state his claims against each Defendant with factual specificity on the Court's approved § 1983 form. (ECF No. 5). On April 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20). On May 13, 2020, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. (ECF No. 25). On May 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 27).
On July 21, 2020, attorney Richard E. Worsham entered his appearance on behalf of Plaintiff. (ECF No. 40). On November 20, 2020, counsel for Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint naming the following individuals as Defendants: Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Captain Richard Mitcham, Lieutenant Kevin Pendleton, Lieutenant Paul Kugler, Lieutenant Billy Perry, Sergeant John Ward, Sergeant Jedidiah Cotton, Dr. Deanna Hopson, and Nurse Sherie Rice.[2] (ECF No. 60).[3] Plaintiff is suing Defendants in their individual and official capacities and is seeking compensatory and punitive damages. Id. at p. 12.
In Count I, Plaintiff claims Defendants were aware of Plaintiff's serious medical condition “but deliberately disregarded it”. (ECF No. 60, p. 7-9). In Count II, Plaintiff alleges Defendants “subjected Plaintiff to physical, mental, and sexual abuse in violation of Plaintiff's constitutional rights.” Id. at p. 9. In Count III, Plaintiff alleges Defendants “refused to follow the directive of the Arkansas Department of Health”, issued on April 15, 2020, to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in correctional facilities”. Id. at p. 10.
Plaintiff also asserts a breach of contract claim under state law in Count IV against Defendant Rice. (ECF No. 60, pp. 11-12). He claims she has a contract of employment with Union County to provide medical care and treatment for inmates in the UCDC and Plaintiff was a third-party beneficiary to that contract. Plaintiff alleges Defendant Rice breached her duty to provide medical care and treatment to him. Id. at p. 12.
On March 18, 2021, Defendants Cotton, Kugler, Mitcham, Pendleton, Rice and Roberts filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 73). They argue the motion should be granted because: 1) Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity; 2) Defendants were not deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's medical needs; 3) there is no evidence Plaintiff suffered any physical, mental, or sexual abuse as a result of the actions, or inactions, of Defendants; 4) none of the Defendants were deliberately indifferent to any “excessive or substantial” risk of Covid-19 with respect to Plaintiff; 5) Defendant Rice did not breach any contract to provide medical care to Plaintiff; and 6) there is no proof of any unconstitutional county policy or custom of Union County which was the “moving force” behind any alleged violation of Plaintiff's rights. (ECF No. 75). In support of the motion, Defendants submitted a Statement of Facts (ECF No. 74), a Brief (ECF No. 75), Plaintiff's Deposition Transcript (ECF No. 74-1), and affidavits from Defendants Cotton (ECF No. 74-2), Roberts (ECF No. 74-3), Rice (ECF No. 74-4), Mitcham (ECF No. 74-5), and Kugler (ECF No. 74-6).
On April 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Response to the motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 83). He also filed disputed Statements of Fact (ECF No. 85), and a Brief in Support of his Response. (ECF No. 87). Plaintiff argues Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment because he filed numerous grievances against Defendants which should be viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff regarding his claims and Plaintiff testified in his deposition concerning the various incidents supporting his claims. Id. at pp. 4-7. Plaintiff argues there are material issues of fact in dispute...
To continue reading
Request your trial