Gulf and South American Steamship Co., Inc. v. Simmons

Decision Date24 July 1968
Docket NumberNo. 24912.,24912.
Citation394 F.2d 504
PartiesGULF AND SOUTH AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO., Inc., Appellant, v. Edward Cabon SIMMONS, Appellee. T. SMITH & SON, INC., Appellant, v. GULF AND SOUTH AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO., Inc., et al., Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Charles Kohlmeyer, Jr., New Orleans, La., Thomas W. Thorne, Jr., Robert C. Leininger, New Orleans, La., for T. Smith & Son, Inc.; Lemle & Kelleher, New Orleans, La., of counsel.

M. D. Yager, William E. Wright, New Orleans, La., Benjamin W. Yancey, New Orleans, La., for appellant-appellee, Gulf & South American Steamship Co., Inc.; Terriberry, Rault, Carroll, Yancey & Farrell, New Orleans, La., of counsel.

Edgar N. Quillin, Arabi, La., Ray Clement, New Orleans, La., for Edward Cabon Simmons.

Before TUTTLE and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The two judgments appealed from, one in favor of longshoreman Simmons against Gulf and American, and the other by the Steamship Company against T. Smith, the stevedoring company, posed only issues of fact for determination by the trial court. The appeals likewise present similar questions to us. There was ample evidence to warrant the judgments both on the main claim of Simmons (including the determination that Simmons was not guilty of contributory negligence) and on the cross claim by the Steamship Company against T. Smith, the stevedoring contractor, Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp., 350 U.S. 124, 76 S.Ct. 232, 100 L. Ed. 133.

The judgments are affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Manning v. M/V" SEA ROAD"
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 16, 1969
    ...judge) opinion in Simmons v. Gulf and South American S. S. Co., E.D.La., 1966, 260 F.Supp. 525, 1967 A.M.C. 29, aff'd 5 Cir., 1968, 394 F.2d 504, 1968 A.M.C. 1978. "There is no doubt that the owner of a vessel is liable to a longshoreman who is injured because of unseaworthiness resulting f......
  • Scott v. SS Ciudad De Ibague
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 20, 1970
    ...E.D.Pa.1968, 286 F.Supp. 691; Simmons v. Gulf and South American S. S. Co., E.D.La.1966, 260 F.Supp. 525, aff'd per curiam, 5 Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 504; Ray v. Compania Naviera Continental, S.A., D.Md.1962, 203 F.Supp. ...
  • Reyes v. Vantage S. S. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 26, 1977
    ...Lines, Inc., 4 Cir. 1963, 324 F.2d 660; Simmons v. Gulf and South American S.S. Co., (E.D.La.1966), 260 F.Supp. 525, aff'd, 5 Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 504, 1968 AMC 1978. In the application of these requirements to Reyes, the shipowners have made no attempt to dispute the testimony of the Captai......
  • Arthur v. Flota Mercante Gran Centro Americana, SA
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • January 2, 1974
    ...Lines, Inc., 324 F.2d 660 (4th Cir., 1963); Simmons v. Gulf and South American S.S. Co., 260 F. Supp. 525 (E.D.La., 1966), aff'd, 394 F. 2d 504 (5th Cir., 1968); Bue, Admiralty Law in the Fifth Circuit—A Compendium for Practitioners I, 4 Houston L. Rev. 347, 404 (1966). The litigants cite u......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT