Gulf, C. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. Miami S.S. Co.

Decision Date29 March 1898
Docket Number689.
Citation86 F. 407
PartiesGULF, C. & S.F. RY. CO. et al. v. MIAMI S.S. CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

James Hagerman, T. S. Miller, N. A. Stedman, and J. W. Terry, for appellants.

M. C McLemore, John Neethe, and F. Chas. Hume, for appellee.

Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and SWAYNE, District judge.

McCORMICK Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case alleges that:

'The Miami Steamship Company, a corporation duly incorporated under and by virtue of the laws of the state of New York complaining of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, the International & Great Northern Railroad Company, and the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas, in this behalf says: That the Gulf, Colorado &amp Santa Fe Railway Company is a corporation duly incorporated under and by virtue of the general and special laws of the state of Texas, having its general offices at Galveston, Texas, in said state, and of which L. J. Polk is general manager; that it is a component part of, and subsidiary to, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, and what is commonly known as the Santa Fe System; that it has and maintains traffic relations with connecting lines, and is engaged in the traffic of state and interstate commerce. That the International & Great Northern Railroad Company is a corporation duly incorporated under and by virtue of general and special laws of the state of Texas, and has its general office at Palestine, in the state of Texas, and of which Leroy Trice is general superintendent; that it is a component part of, and subsidiary to, what is known commonly as the Missouri Pacific, or Gould, System, and is engaged in traffic of state and interstate commerce. That the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas is a corporation duly incorporated under and by virtue of general and special laws of the state of Texas, and has its general offices at Dallas, Texas, and of which A. A. Allen is general manager; that it is a component part of, and subsidiary to, what is commonly known as the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway System; that it has and maintains traffic relations with connecting lines, and is engaged in the traffic of state and interstate commerce. That said three railway companies are the only trunk lines of road running through the state of Texas, and connected by close traffic relations with the systems of railway reaching points beyond the state of Texas and in states and territories north and west of Texas, a market and field from which and to which large quantities of freight are consigned and shipped, and having termini at Galveston, Texas, connecting with the Mallory Line and your orator. That your orator is engaged as a common carrier for hire in the traffic of state and interstate commerce, owning and operating a line of steamships between the ports of New York, in the state of New York, and Galveston, in the state of Texas; and at Galveston, Texas, it connects with the lines of the railway companies hereinbefore named. That its steamships are commodious, safe, and seaworthy, and amply fitted or the purpose of transporting freight between the points named. That in the city of New York it connects with all the lines of railway running into said city, and has in the said port and at the port of Galveston wharves and sheds sufficient to accommodate and protect all freights delivered to it, and has in every respect facilities sufficient to serve the public with dispatch, comfort, and safety. That it has been operating its said line of steamships between said ports since the 15th day of July, 1897, and has done a large business in every respect satisfactory to its patrons. That since said day your orator has received from and delivered to said railroad companies large quantities of freight on its wharf in the city of Galveston, destined to or shipped from points on the several lines of said railroads and their connecting lines, and it has received from and granted to said railroad companies the same rights, privileges, conditions, and exactions as to or by any other line of steamships in similar service as your orator granted or demanded in the interchange of freight. That there is one, and only one, other line of steamships which plies between Galveston and New York, which is owned and operated by the New York & Texas Steamship Company, commonly known and called the Mallory Line, and which hereinafter will be referred to as the Mallory Line. That said line of steamships is engaged in exactly similar service as those of your orator, and said line has at New York and at Galveston wharves and sheds which connect with the several lines of railway running into said cities. That said Mallory Line has been in operation between said ports for a number of years, and for several years prior to the time your orator's line of steamships was put in operation had no competitor for the business between said ports. That the accommodations of said Mallory Line and of your orator for the reception and delivery of freight, in unloading and loading vessels, in receiving and delivering freight, are in every respect similar and equal. Their respective wharves connect with the several lines of the respondents in the same and similar manner, and the same and similar accommodations prevail for the reception and delivery of freight, for the loading and unloading of cars. That the cost of loading and unloading cars at the respective wharves is the same, and the respondents have contracts for loading and unloading cars at the respective wharves for the same price. That it has been, and is now, the established custom and usage by and between said railroad companies and the Mallory Line and your orator, in the interchange of freight, for the line over which freight might be routed to advance to the line over which the freight originated the charges attached to such freight up to the time of delivery to the steamship company or railroad company over which it was to be forwarded to destination.

That it is, and has been, an established custom and usage between the respondents and the Mallory Line and your orator since it has been in business, with reference to freight originating at New York or beyond, and destined to points in Texas on the lines of railway operated by respondents, for the Mallory Line and your orator to bill such freight through from its point of origin to the point of destination at a through rate previously agreed upon, but on equal, exact, and similar conditions with reference to both steamship lines, and for said railroads to pay to the steamship company delivering the freight from point of origin to Galveston under such agreement, and to receive the freight tendered by such steamship company, and forward same to its destination under such agreement. And it is, and has been, an established custom and usage between the respondents and the Mallory Line and your orator, with reference to freight originating at points on the lines of the several railway companies in Texas destined for New York or to points beyond on lines of railway connected with the Mallory Line and your orator at that point, to bill freight from point of origin to point of destination at a through rate previously agreed upon, and at the same and similar rates and under the same exact and similar conditions, and for the steamship company receiving such freight to pay to the railroad company delivering the freight at Galveston the charges for freights earned by said railroad company in transporting the freight from point of origin to Galveston, Texas, under said agreement, and to receive the freight tendered by the railroad company, and forward the same to New York, if that be the point of destination, or, if beyond, to deliver same to connecting lines reaching said point, under said agreement. This custom and usage is established in all cases, except in the case of perishable goods, when the custom does not apply.

'That there is a combination of railway companies and steamship companies known and designated by the name of the Southwestern Freight Bureau, composed of and by the principal railway systems in the southwestern portion of the United States, of which the respondents the Southern Pacific Company, the Morgan Steamship Company, and the Cromwell Steamship Company, which latter steamship companies operate lines of steamship between the ports of New Orleans, in the state of Louisiana, and New York, and the Mallory Line, are members, organized for the purpose of controlling freight of interstate commerce in that portion of the United States reached by the said railroads and their connections by rail and water. That heretofore, to wit, on or about the 31st day of January, 1898, at a meeting of said freight bureau, called for that purpose in the city of New York, state of New York at which representatives of the lines herein complained of,-- the Mallory, the Morgan, and the Cromwell Steamship Lines, thereunto duly authorized,-- were present, said railroads entered into a conspiracy with said steamship companies against your orator, wherein and whereby it was and is attempted to prevent your orator from carrying on its business as a common carrier in interstate commerce. That said railroad companies entered into an agreement with said Mallory Line, the Cromwell Line, and the Morgan Line in substance and in effect as follows: 'That all through rates and divisions via Gulf ports be discontinued from and to domestic ports with steamer lines not members of this association, and all interchange of traffic with such lines be discontinued as far as possible. That in consideration of assistance given the Mallory Line by the adoption of this agreement the Mallory Line is to cancel all existing contracts or special...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 10 Mayo 1922
    ... ... Co. v ... Atchison, T. & S.F. Co. (C.C.) 73 F. 438; Gulf, C. & ... S.F. Ry. Co. v. Miami S.S. Co., 86 F. 407, 30 C.C.A ... 142; ... ...
  • Gratiot Street Warehouse Company v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 30 Abril 1907
    ...freight charges, or an agreement waiving the same, and the court therefore erred in refusing defendant's second instruction. Railroad v. Steamship Co., 86 F. 407. (2) The bill of lading provided that the amount of any or damage should be computed at the value or cost at the place of shipmen......
  • Lusk v. Atkinson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 15 Mayo 1916
    ... ... Comm. v. Railroad, 167 U.S. 633; Railroad v. Miami ... S. S. Co., 86 F. 407; Bacon v. Illinois, 227 ... U.S. 504; Coal ... State from having an independent and intrastate character ... [ Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Texas, 204 ... U.S. 403, 51 L.Ed. 540, ... ...
  • Gray v. Building Trades Council
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 24 Diciembre 1903
    ... ... Harrington, 64 F. 821; Greer v ... Stoller, 77 F. 1; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miami ... S.S. Co., 86 F. 407; Southern I. Exp ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT