Gulf Oil Co. v. Bevis, s. 45152
Decision Date | 17 October 1975 |
Docket Number | Nos. 45152,s. 45152 |
Citation | 322 So.2d 30 |
Parties | GULF OIL COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. William H. BEVIS et al., Respondents, and McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc., et al., and Motor Fuel Carriers, Inc., Intervening Respondents. to 45154, 45169, 45156. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Edward C. Adkins and William D. Keettel, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for Gulf Oil Co., Shell Oil Co. and Exxon Co.
James E. Wharton and David J. Fuller, Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson & Wharton, Orlando, for Fleet Transport Co., Inc.
George L. Varnadoe, Holland & Knight, Tallahassee, for Union Oil Co. of California.
William L. Weeks and Donald R. Alexander, Tallahassee, for the Florida Public Service Commission.
W. Guy McKenzie, Jr. and Thomas F. Panebianco, Carswell, McKenzie, Dean & Owen, Tallahassee, for McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc.
Edwin L. Mason, David B. Erwin and Philip S. Parsons, Mason & Erwin, Tallahassee, for Motor Fuel Carriers, Inc.
Richard H. Wilson, Tampa, for Redwing Carriers, Inc. and Petroleum Carrier Corp. of Florida, Inc., amicus curiae.
These causes are before us on petitions for writ of certiorari to the Public Service Commission. 1
In these consolidated cases we are primarily reviewing Order No. 11045 of the Public Service Commission, dated November 6, 1973, which order changed the incentive rate 2 of shippers from fifteen percent to five percent. Also before us is Order No. 11221 which denied petitioners' request for reconsideration of Order No. 11045. Supersedeas was posted pending this review.
The crucial question is whether the Public Service Commission acted according to law in changing the incentive rate from fifteen percent to five percent in Order No. 11045. Objections to the prior fifteen percent discount came from trucking companies which were, generally, too small to enter into such agreements. They complained that discrimination against them arose by unfair competition because shippers would use the big transportation companies which were able to provide service at cut-rates. After taking testimony and relying upon its own knowledge of conditions, the incentive rate change was made by the Respondent Commission.
Petitioners argue that the Commission acted without competent and substantial evidence before it. It was argued that the effect of Order No. 11045 was to substantially eliminate incentive rates, since shippers propably would not agree to use a vehicle one hundred hours per week for a mere five percent reduction in rates.
Petitioners rely upon this Court's definitions of competent and substantial evidence in Public Service Commission proceedings, which definitions still control. In 1931 in a major case, Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. State Railroad Commission, 3 this Court said:
'. . . If there is substantial competent evidence that is legally sufficient to support the findings and conclusions, and no rule of law was violated in the proceedings, and the whole record does not show an abuse of authority or arbitrary action, the findings and conclusions of the commission will not be set aside . . . even though the reviewing court might have reached different conclusions on the evidence. . . .'
In the much-cited case of De Groot v. Sheffield, 4 this Court defined what it meant by 'competent substantial evidence' when used in the context of judicial review of agency action:
. . .'
We have applied the above standards to the evidence in the record and feel the Commission had competent and substantial evidence along with its own knowledge and expertise to arrive at a legally sufficient conclusion in the matter. It is our opinion that reasonable men could have reached this or a different result, but in the absence of a showing of insufficient evidence or of a departure from the essential requirements of law, we are compelled to sustain the orders of the Commission.
Section 350.12(2)(m), Florida Statutes, provides:
'. . . Every . . . order heretofore or hereafter made by the commissioners shall be deemed and held to be within their jurisdiction and their powers, and to be reasonable and just . . ..'
Thus, the order on review carries a presumption of correctness. Further, the scope of this Court's review and the petitioners' burden has been enunciated on a number of occasions by this Court. It was succinctly summarized in the case of Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Carter 5 as follows:
The Public Service Commission is a creature of the Florida Legislature and its duties are primarily administrative, although it performs many quasi-judicial functions. If it is not doing the will of the Legislature as to public policy or if it is not otherwise serving the public as intended, it becomes a legislative function to modify its course of conduct. It is only in those limited instances in which violations of the legal standards mentioned above occur that this Court may modify or reverse its actions. We find no basis in the record to quash or change Public Service Commission Order No. 11045 or any other matters presently before us.
Accordingly, the petitions for writ of certiorari are denied.
It is so...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Tascano v. State, KK-22
-
Chicken 'N' Things v. Murray
... ... Gulf Oil Co. v. Bevis, 322 So.2d 30 (Fla.1975); DeGroot v. Sheffield, supra at 916; Tamiami Trail Tours, ... ...
-
GULF COAST ELEC. CO-OP., INC. v. Johnson, 92,479.
... ... See Gulf Oil Co. v. Bevis, 322 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla.1975), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in General Dev. Utils., Inc. v. Hawkins, 357 So.2d 408, 409 n. 4 ... ...
-
United Telephone Co. of Fla. v. Mayo
... ... Shevin v. Yarborough, 274 So.2d 505 (Fla.1973); Gulf Oil Co. v. Bevis, 322 So.2d 30 (Fla.1975); American Sightseeing Tours, Inc. v. Bevis, 326 So.2d 437 ... ...