Gulf Oil Corporation v. Mobile Drilling Barge or Vessel, 76-1085
Decision Date | 09 January 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 76-1085,76-1085 |
Citation | 565 F.2d 958 |
Parties | GULF OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The MOBILE DRILLING BARGE OR VESSEL known as MARGARET, her engines, etc., et al., Defendants. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al., Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Robert B. Acomb, Jr., Glenn G. Goodier, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff.
Francis Emmett, R. A. Redwine, New Orleans, La., for defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
Finding no error of fact or law in the opinion of the District Court, 441 F.Supp. 1 (E.D.La.1975), the judgment is AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial18 cases
-
Oaks v. City of Fairhope, Ala.
...constitute a breach of the agreement. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Mobile Drilling Barge or Vessel, 441 F.Supp. 1, 4 (E.D. La.1975), aff'd, 565 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1978). 8. Generally, the substantive law of Alabama governs the interpretation and effect of the Settlement Agreement. See generally, 15A A......
-
OFFSHORE LOGISTICS, ETC. v. ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON MFR'S
...by the policy is without probable cause." Gulf Oil Corp. v. Mobile Drilling Barge or Vessel, 441 F.Supp. 1, 13 (E.D.La.1975), aff'd. 565 F.2d 958 (1978) (citations omitted) (emphasis See also Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Louisiana Nat'l Bank, 399 F.Supp. 54, 57 (M.D.La. 1975); Reichert v. Conti......
-
Everhart v. Drake Management, Inc., 78-1428
...the parties' intention as revealed by the policy's language. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Mobile Drilling Barge, 441 F.Supp. 1, 11, aff'd 565 F.2d 958, 959 (5th Cir. 1975); General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 260 So.2d 249, 263 (Fla. App. 1972). Nevertheless, ......
-
INA of Texas v. Richard, 85-2693
...604-05 (5th Cir.1961); Gulf Oil Corp. v. Mobile Drilling Barge or Vessel, 441 F.Supp. 1, 12-13 (E.D.La.1975), aff'd per curiam, 565 F.2d 958 (5th Cir.1978); see Crispin Co. v. M/V Korea, 251 F.Supp. 878, 879 (S.D.Tex.1965). 2 Similarly, we have held that state law governs the propriety of t......
Request a trial to view additional results