Gulfport Shipbuilding Corporation v. Vallot

Decision Date24 September 1964
Docket NumberNo. 20764.,20764.
Citation334 F.2d 358
PartiesGULFPORT SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION and Texas Employers' Insurance Association, Appellants, v. Maxime VALLOT et al., Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Carl O. Bue, Jr., Ben L. Reynolds, Houston, Tex., Royston, Rayzor & Cook, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellants.

David J. McCarthy, Jr., Alan S. Rosenthal, Richard S. Salzman, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Alto V. Watson, Beaumont, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, PRETTYMAN* and JONES, Circuit Judges.

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The appellee, Maxime Vallot, had been a longshoreman in the employ of the appellant, Gulfport Shipbuilding Corporation. During such employment, on September 6, 1957, Vallot sustained an injury while working as an apprentice welder on the SS KERMAC. As a result of the injury, Vallot was paid compensation for five weeks, the last payment being on December 4, 1957. On June 17, 1958, the Deputy Commissioner of the Labor Department's Bureau of Employees Compensation sent Vallot a notice which stated, among other things the date of injury, the period for which compensation had been paid, and that Vallot had returned to work. The notice concluded with the following:

"If the facts in your case are as indicated above, you have received the amount of compensation payment to which you are entitled under the law, and the case will be closed in the files of this office.
"If the facts are not as indicated above, kindly advise this office by personal call or letter WITHIN TEN DAYS as to the actual facts, and your case will have further investigation.
"The right to compensation for disability is barred unless claim therefor is filed within one year after the injury or within one year after the date of the last payment of compensation, and any application for review of a compensation case must be filed with the Deputy Commissioner within one year after the date of the last payment of compensation or within one year after rejection of a claim."

The one-year limitation to which reference is made in the notice is prescribed by Section 13(a) of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act.1 The Deputy Commissioner received from Vallot a response dated June 20, 1958, in these words:

"In your last letter that I received from you stated that I was paid from Sept. 9-57 to Dec. 3-57. I would like to correct this error because I received only four checks. The first one was for two weeks which was $106, and the other three were for $53 a week. This is the only money that I have received from the insurance.
"I would also like to correct the error that said that I had returned to work on full earning power. I have worked in that period for only a few days, and I have been laid off from that company since the accident.
"I am still having trouble with the injured nerve in my neck that I received from the accident."

A formal claim was filed on March 13, 1962. The Deputy Commissioner held a hearing on Vallot's request for additional compensation and took testimony with respect to whether he was injured. Without passing on the merits of the claim, the Deputy Commissioner, by an order dated September 25, 1962, rejected it because it was not timely filed. In so...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Bohms v. Gardner
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • August 8, 1967
    ...the Third Circuit cases and this one. Those cases are precedent here and, furthermore, we agree with them. Gulfport Shipbuilding Corp. v. Vallot, 334 F.2d 358, 360 (5 Cir. 1964), cert. den. 380 U.S. 974, 85 S.Ct. 1333, 14 L.Ed.2d 269, affords further The appeal is not saved by any theory th......
  • Cooper Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • September 8, 1987
    ...Inc. v. Estate of Verderane, 729 F.2d 726, 727 (11th Cir.1984); see United Fruit, 546 F.2d at 1225; Gulfport Shipbuilding Corp. v. Vallot, 334 F.2d 358, 360 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 974, 85 S.Ct. 1333, 14 L.Ed.2d 269 (1965). Accordingly, employer's petition for review is * Hon......
  • Todd Shipyards, Inc. v. Fraley
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 2, 1979
    ...it. A remand is in order, See, e. g., Perkins v. Coal Operators Casualty Company, 5 Cir. 1965, 353 F.2d 784; Gulfport Ship Building Corporation v. Vallot, 5 Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 358, Cert. denied, 380 U.S. 974, 85 S.Ct. 1333, 14 L.Ed.2d 269; Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Director, 3 Cir. 1977, 5......
  • Andras v. Donovan, 26910.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 16, 1969
    ...Deputy Commissioner. Accordingly, we think it is appropriate to remand this case to the Deputy Commissioner. See Gulfport Shipbuilding Corp. v. Vallot, 5 Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 358; LeBlanc v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1959, 264 F.2d 946; Standard Dredging Corp. v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1945, 150 F.2d 78,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT