Gulliher v. People of State

Citation82 Ill. 145,1876 WL 10156
PartiesJASON GULLIHER et al.v.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
Decision Date30 June 1876
CourtSupreme Court of Illinois

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. ARTHUR A. SMITH, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. WILLIAMS, MCKENZIE & CALKINS, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. J. J. TUNNICLIFF, State's Attorney, for the People. Mr. JUSTICE WALKER delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an indictment against plaintiffs in error, for robbery, upon which they were convicted.

On the trial, Foote was sworn as a witness, and testified to matters which, if true, tended to rebut the proofs of the prosecution in material matters relating to himself and to his co-defendant. He was, however, in this contradicted by other witnesses.

The court gave to the jury the following instruction:

“The court instructs the jury that while, under the statute, the defendants are permitted to testify, their credibility is left to the jury; and if the jury believe that the defendant, Alfred F. Foote, has sworn wilfully false, or been contradicted on a material point, then the jury have a right to disregard his whole testimony, unless corroborated by other testimony.”

Exception was taken by each of the plaintiffs in error to this ruling of the court.

The instruction was clearly erroneous. When analyzed, it plainly tells the jury that, “if they believe, from the evidence, that Alfred F. Foote has been contradicted on a material point, then the jury have a right to disregard his whole testimony, unless corroborated by other testimony.” This is not the law. The defendant in a criminal prosecution, in this respect, when he testifies, must be tried, as a witness, by the same rules which prevail as to other witnesses.

If the witness, whether defendant or otherwise, is shown, by proofs, to have sworn wilfully and knowingly false on any material matter, his evidence may be rejected, so far as it is not corroborated. Of course his interest in the result goes to his credibility, which the jury are to weigh. The mere fact, however, that he is contradicted as to some material matter, is not enough to warrant the rejection of his evidence altogether, unless the jury believe that, as to the matter in which he has been thus contradicted, he has sworn falsely, and knew his evidence was false. There is no force in the other objections urged by plaintiffs in error.

For this error, the judgment and verdict must be set aside, and the cause remanded...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Godair v. Ham Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1907
    ...41 Ill. 251;City of Chicago v. Smith, 48 Ill. 107;United States Express Co. v. Hutchins, 58 Ill. 44; Pope v. Dodson, Id. 360; Gulliher v. People, 82 Ill. 145;Swan v. People, 98 Ill. 610;Hoge v. People, 117 Ill. 35, 6 N. E. 796;Freeman v. Easly, 117 Ill. 317, 7 N. E. 656;Overtoom v. Chicago ......
  • Dilley v. the People.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 31, 1879
    ... ... Williamson, 35 Ill. 529; Huddle v. Martin, 54 Ill. 258; C. & A. R. R. Co. v. Buttolf, 66 Ill. 347; Peak v. The People, 76 Ill. 289; Gulliher v. The People, 82 Ill. 145; Angle v. Faul, 85 Ill. 106.Mr. C. DUNHAM and Mr. T. E. MILCHRIST, for defendant in error; as to the instructions, cited ... ...
  • Beedle v. People
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • October 26, 1903
    ... ... 197]J. M. Newman and W. C. Johns, for plaintiff in error.H. J. Hamlin, Atty. Gen., Geo. B. Gillespie, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John H. Chadwick, State's Atty., for the People.RICKS, J.At the October term, 1902, of the Douglas circuit court, plaintiff in error was indicted for the crime of forgery ... people, lays down a rule in conflict with the rule here expressed, it must be held to have been departed from in the more recent cases of Gulliher v. People, 82 Ill. 145; Healy v. People, 163 Ill. 372, 45 N. E. 230; and Matthews v. Granger, 196 Ill. 164, 63 N. E. 658.By the instruction the jury ... ...
  • Chicago City Ry. Co. v. Ryan
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1907
    ... ... 30 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, p. 1063; Powell v. State, 101 Ga. 9, 29 S. E. 309,65 Am. St. Rep. 277;Smith v. State, 109 Ga. 479, 35 S. E. 59;Commonwealth v. Welch, 111 Ky. 530, 63 S. W. 984;Beedle v. People, 204 Ill. 197, 68 N. E. 434. The word impeached, however, is frequently used as synonymous in ... Gulliher v. People, 82 Ill. 145;Swan v. People, 98 Ill. 610;Hoge v. People, 117 Ill. 35, 6 N. E. 796;Perkins ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT