Gunther v. US EMPLOYEES'COMPENSATION COMMISSION, 5973.
Decision Date | 19 May 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 5973.,5973. |
Citation | 41 F.2d 151 |
Parties | GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION COMMISSION et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
H. W. Hutton, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Edwin T. Cooper and Charles T. White, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee California Stevedore & Ballast Co.
Before DIETRICH and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
This is an action in equity to review an order of the deputy commissioner for the Thirteenth district under the Act of Congress of March 4, 1927, known as "Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act." USCA Title 33, c. 18, §§ 901-950. From a decree dismissing the cause plaintiff appeals.
Appellant is the widow of Richard W. Gunther, who was accidentally killed on August 16, 1927, while working in the capacity of a longshoreman or stevedore for the defendant California Stevedore & Ballast Company at the port of San Francisco. Hearings were had before the deputy commissioner upon appellant's application for widow's compensation, and following such hearings an order was made allowing her compensation in the sum of $6.01 per week, and denying her petition for a lump sum settlement. This proceeding was instituted and appeal taken under the provisions of section 921 of the act, supra, authorizing the review of such orders when made "not in accordance with law." It is appellant's contention that the compensation order is not in accordance with law.
The basis upon which the deputy commissioner is required to make determination of the compensation to be allowed is governed by the provisions of section 910 of Title 33, the material portion of which reads:
The deputy commissioner, called as a witness in the court below, testified concerning the making of the compensation order as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. Bonner
...earning capacity under section 910(c), the actual wages earned by the employee are not controlling. Gunther v. United States Employees' Compensation Commission, 41 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1930). And in reviewing rulings of the BRB, which affirmed the ALJ here, this court generally must defer to ......
-
Forrest v. Theo. H. Davies & Co., Ltd.
...Ins. Co. v. Van Steene, 120 F.2d 548; Flores v. Bay Ridge Operating Co., 131 F.2d 310; Gunther v. U.S. Employees' Compensation Commission, 41 F.2d 151; Harbor Marine Contracting Co. v. Lowe, 152 F.2d 845; Luchenbach S. S. Co. v. Norton, 96 F.2d 764; Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co., 56 F.2d......
- Mitchell Woodbury Corp. v. Albert Pick Barth Co.
-
O'Hearne v. Maryland Casualty Co.
...of any other interpretation, but is in accord with the decisions elsewhere construing it. See Gunther v. United States Employees Compensation Commission, 9 Cir., 41 F.2d 151; Andrew F. Mahoney Co. v. Marshall, D.C., 46 F.2d 539, and cases there cited; affirmed 9 Cir., 56 F.2d 74; Continenta......