Guthrie v. Civil Service Bd. of City of Jasper
Decision Date | 09 February 1977 |
Citation | 342 So.2d 372 |
Parties | Richard Lynn GUTHRIE v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF the CITY OF JASPER, Alabama. Civ. 956. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Joel P. Robinson, Elliott, O'Rear & Robinson, Jasper, for appellant.
Morris W. Savage, Bankhead, Savage & Stephens, Jasper, for appellee.
Richard Lynn Guthrie, a permanent employee of the Police Department of the City of Jasper, Alabama, was discharged on March 22, 1974 by the Jasper Chief of Police for 'conduct unbecoming to his official position or job.' Section 17 of the rules and regulations promulgated by the Jasper Civil Service Board provides that a city employee can be discharged, Inter alia, for 'conduct unbecoming to his or her official position or job.'
On March 26, 1974 Guthrie appealed his discharge to the Civil Service Board. After several continuances a hearing was had before the Board on December 5, 1974. The Board sustained Guthrie's discharge and ruled that the discharge was to be effective retroactively to March 22, 1974.
Guthrie appealed the Board's ruling to the Walker County Circuit Court. In its decree that court stated that it was bound by the Board's finding of fact and that after a careful search of the record it found no error of law. Guthrie then filed a motion for new trial, alleging that the charge made against him, i.e. that his conduct was unbecoming to his official position or job, is unconstitutionally vague and therefore unenforceable, and that the procedure which permits a city department head to discharge an employee without first informing the employee of the charges and affording the employee an opportunity to be heard is violative of due process. The new trial request was denied.
Guthrie appeals to this court from the trial court's affirmance of the Board's decision and the denial of his request for a new trial.
Appellant-Guthrie appears first to be asking us to decide that an off-duty policeman's appearance in public while drinking or intoxicated is not 'unbecoming conduct' as a matter of law, for in his brief he refers us to Barney v. City of Ashland, 220 Ky. 657, 295 S.W. 998 (1927), which held that the taking of a drink of intoxicating liquor by a policeman does not, of itself, justify his removal where such conduct is not made a ground for removal by the statute or by the rules and regulations of the police department. In effect Guthrie's argument is that we decide afresh whether his conduct in public by openly drinking beer and being noticeably intoxicated was unbecoming, although the Civil Service Board previously decided that very same question against him.
As we view it, we are precluded from such an examination. Rather the first issue for our consideration is whether there was sufficient evidence presented to the Civil Service Board to support its finding that Guthrie's public drinking and intoxication while off duty in a dry county amounted to conduct unbecoming to his job as a policeman and warranted his discharge.
The City of Jasper operates under a civil service system established by Act No. 113, Acts of Alabama 1965, 1st Sp. Sess., p. 162, which governs the appointment, removal, tenure and official conduct of employees of the city. Section 14 of the act provides:
Subsection (b) provides that the findings of fact made by the Civil Service Board are final and conclusive. On appeal the circuit court is limited to a review of the record made before the Board and questions of law presented. Under such circumstances this court's review is also based on a review of the record made before the Board and we look only to see if its findings are supported by substantial evidence. See City of Mobile v. Personnel Board for Mobile County, 57 Ala.App. 516, 329 So.2d 570 (1976); Edmondson v. Tuscaloosa County, 48 Ala.App. 372, 377, 265 So.2d 154 (1972).
Furthermore, after a careful reading of subsection (a), we conclude that the legislature intended to give broad quasi-judicial powers to the Jasper Civil Service Board. In Edmondson v. Tuscaloosa County, supra, we reviewed a similar statute and held that where there is substantial evidence to support the discretionary authority of the discharging board, no authority is reposed in the reviewing circuit court to supplant the board's judgment with its own.
In the situation presented by the case at bar, the review by the circuit court is in effect that of certiorari. Grant v. City of Mobile, 50 Ala.App. 684, 282 So.2d 285, cert. den. 291 Ala. 458, 282 So.2d 291 (1973). On such review the court is restricted to examining only the external validity of the proceeding. Alabama Electric Cooperative v. Alabama Power Co., 278 Ala. 123, 176 So.2d 483 (1964); Phelps v. Public Service Commission, 46 Ala.App. 13, 237 So.2d 499 (1970). We do not believe that we can violate these restrictions any more than could the circuit court in deciding the question presented by appellant. We are, therefore, precluded from deciding whether Guthrie's public conduct was unbecoming. The Board found as a fact that Guthrie's public drinking and intoxication, even though he was off duty and out of uniform at the time, was conduct unbecoming a policeman and tended to foster disrespect for the city police department and law enforcement.
The testimony elicited at the hearing before the Board showed that Guthrie was observed drinking beer and being intoxicated in a public place, in a dry county and in the presence of young people. Not only was Guthrie openly violating a law he was sworn...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dockery v. City of Jasper
...Act. "[T]he legislature intended to give broad quasi-judicial powers to the Jasper Civil Service Board." Guthrie v. Civil Serv. Bd. of Jasper, 342 So. 2d 372, 375 (Ala. Civ. App. 1977). Section 14(a) of the Act requires the Board to enter an order that "is warranted by the evidence and unde......
-
Bonner v. Kilgore
...and whether its findings are supported by evidence in the record. See, e.g., Fox v. City of Huntsville, 9 So. 3d 1229, 1232 (Ala. 2008); Civil Serv. Bd. of Appeals for Lauderdale Cty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Daniels, 642 So. 2d 426, 428 (Ala. 1994). Nevertheless, it is clear that an aggrieved em......
-
Carter v. Harris, Civ.A.98-A-1163-N.
...a termination decision can be appealed to the state circuit court in which the city is found. See Guthrie v. Civil Service Board of the City of Jasper, 342 So.2d 372, 374 (Ala.Civ.App.1977). The system itself provides for review of employment decisions by Alabama courts, independent of any ......
-
Minesaha, Inc. v. Town of Webb
...before the Board and we look only to see if its findings are supported by substantial evidence.’ Guthrie v. Civil Service Board of City of Jasper, 342 So.2d 372, 375 (Ala. Civ. App. 1977). An exception exists, however, where a party attempts to show that the Board's action denied him due pr......