Gutta-Percha R. Mfg. Co. v. Kansas City F. D. Supply Co.
Decision Date | 28 March 1899 |
Citation | 50 S.W. 912,149 Mo. 538 |
Parties | GUTTA-PERCHA RUBBER MFG. CO. v. KANSAS CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT SUPPLY CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. A manufacturing company executed a deed of trust on its property for the protection of a creditor. Subsequently the trustee took possession, and with the consent of both the creditor and debtor continued the business as before, buying new goods and raw material, which was manufactured. It was so run to help the debtor, and the creditor expected to get his money out, and turn the property back to the debtor, and the intention was to run in that way until enough was realized to pay the creditor. Held, that such possession was fraudulent as to other creditors.
2. Where a debtor executes a deed of trust for the benefit of a creditor with an understanding that the trustee is to take possession and continue the business indefinitely to prevent other creditors attaching the property, such conveyance is fraudulent as to such creditors.
3. Where a trustee takes possession of property conveyed, and sells it, and uses the proceeds, not to pay the notes for which the deed of trust was given to secure, but to buy other goods with which to continue the business, with the consent of the debtor and a creditor, such deed of trust is void as to other creditors.
4. Where appellant submitted no declaration on a question in the circuit court, and saved no exception, the point cannot be reviewed.
5. A creditor cannot still claim his preference to attached property after the court finds that he has been a party to a fraudulent scheme to delay other creditors.
6. Where a debtor conveys his property to a trustee, who is to continue the business indefinitely until the creditor for whose benefit it is made is paid, when it is to be reconveyed to the debtor, the conveyance is void as to other creditors, whether or not the property is of less value than the creditor's claim.
7. Facts which would render a conveyance void if expressed on its face will also render it void if found by the court aliunde to have constituted a part of the transaction.
Appeal from circuit court, Jackson county; C. L. Dobson, Judge.
Action by the Gutta-Percha Rubber Manufacturing Company against the Kansas City Fire Department Supply Company, principal defendant, and James C. Rieger, garnishee. From a judgment against the garnishee, he appeals. Affirmed.
J. W. Garner and Wm. H. Wallace, for appellant. Gage, Ladd & Small, for respondent.
Plaintiff began an action against defendant by attachment on April 6, 1894, and on the same day garnishment was served on James C. Rieger, the appellant herein. The attachment was sustained, and judgment rendered against defendant for $3,628.02. Subsequently the issue between plaintiff and the garnishee was tried, and judgment rendered against the garnishee on April 11, 1896, for $3,892.86. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
The issue arises upon the usual interrogatories propounded to the garnishee, to which he answered at great length "that on the 12th day of December, 1891, James H. Casey, doing business under the name and style of the Kansas City Fire Department Supply Company, delivered to garnishee, as trustee, a deed of trust of that date, which was duly recorded on that day, to secure the payment of notes amounting to $10,000; that afterwards said Casey and others incorporated said business under the name of the Kansas City Fire Department Supply Company, and afterwards, on December 13, 1892, said incorporation made and delivered to garnishee, as trustee, its certain other deed of trust to secure $4,000, which was duly recorded; that both of said deeds covered and conveyed all the stock, furniture, fixtures, and machinery at the place of business of said corporation, No. 2932 Fairmount avenue." The answer then proceeds: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hasbrouck v. LaFebre
... ... D. 547; Greenebaum v ... Wheeler, 90 Ill. 296.) Kansas; ( Standard Imp. Co. v ... Schultz, 45 Kan. 52, 25 P ... Roney, 152 Mo.App. 257, 133 S.W. 83; ... Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Supply Co., 140 Mo. 538, 50 S.W ... 912; ... 213, 28 N.W. 511; ... Westcott v. Sioux City, 141 Ia. 453, 119 N.W. 749; ... Cone v. Belcher (Tex.), ... ...
-
Munford v. Sheldon
...and the trial court should have so decreed instead of dismissing plaintiff's bill. McDonald & Co. v. Hoover, 142 Mo. 484; Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Supply Co., 149 Mo. 538; Barton v. Sitlington, 128 Mo. 164. (2) indebtedness of Sheldon to Lynn E. Bowman only figured $ 3460, and he took an absolute......
-
Johansen Bros. Shoe Co. v. Alles
...state of facts, it is immaterial that the mortgage contains stipulations which render it void, except as between the parties.' In Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Supply Co., the court says that the by the mortgagee of possession before a creditor's seizure of goods 'would have cured the invalidity with ......
-
Kurtz v. Troll
... ... well-considered case in this State. [Rubber Mfg. Co. v ... Supply Co., 149 Mo. loc. cit. 538, 50 S.W ... 514] them ... may be found in what is said by the Kansas City Court of ... Appeals in Sammons v. O'Neill, 60 ... ...