Guzman v. Jones
| Docket Number | 15-40007 |
| Decision Date | 22 October 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
141 cases
-
SCF Waxler Marine LLC v. M/V Aris T
...law, "[s]poliation of evidence ‘is the destruction or the significant and meaningful alteration of evidence.’ " Guzman v. Jones , 804 F.3d 707, 713 (5th Cir. 2015) (quoting Rimkus Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Cammarata , 688 F. Supp. 2d 598, 612 (S.D. Tex. 2010) ). "[A] party seeking the sancti......
-
Mont. State Univ.-Bozeman v. Mont. First Judicial Dist. Court
...alteration, destruction, or failure to preserve evidence for use by an adversary in pending or future litigation. Guzman v. Jones , 804 F.3d 707, 713 (5th Cir. 2015) ; Silvestri v. Gen. Motors Corp. , 271 F.3d 583, 590 (4th Cir. 2001) ; West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 167 F.3d 776, 779 ......
-
Pandya v. Marriott Hotel Servs., Inc.
...faith "generally means destruction for the purpose of hiding adverse evidence." Tesoriero , 965 F.3d at 1184 (quoting Guzman v. Jones , 804 F.3d 707, 713 (5th Cir. 2015) ); see also Mann v. Taser Int'l, Inc. , 588 F.3d 1291, 1310 (11th Cir. 2009).Likewise, to obtain an adverse inference ins......
-
Flores v. Harris
...has notice that the evidence is relevant to the litigation or should have known that the evidence may be relevant." Guzman v. Jones, 804 F.3d 707, 713 (5th Cir. 2015) (citing Rimkus Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Cammarata, 688 F. Supp. 2d 598, 612 (S.D. Tex. 2010)). Spoliation is "the destructio......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Spoliation Of Evidence In Texas ' 2019 Update
...the innocent party. The finding required for an adverse inference jury instruction is "bad faith" or "bad conduct." Guzman v. Jones, 804 F.3d 707, 713 (5th Cir. 2015). Federal law applies the same standards in criminal cases. A notable difference from the Texas standard is that the jury may......